Project Management

Sell Your Teams on Why!

From the pmStudent Blog
by
Ranting and raving about project management and systems engineering.

About this Blog

RSS

Recent Posts

The Problem with Project Management

The Problem with Project Management

The Problem with Project Management

LinkedIn Recommendations Are Easy

The Catch-22 of Project Management Certification and Experience

Categories

Agile, Career Development, Certification, Change Management, Communications Management, Cost Management, Documentation, Earned Value Management, Education, Integration and Test, Kanban, Leadership, Lean, Lessons Learned, Methodology, Misc, Multitasking, New Project, Operations, Planning, PMP, Productivity, Professional Development, Project Estimation, Project Leadership, Quality, Requirements Management, Risk Management, Schedule Management, Scope Management, Software, Systems Thinking, Tools, Video, Work Breakdown Structures (WBS)

Date

linkedin twitter facebook Request to reuse this  

Categories: Leadership


I absolutely love this TED talk by Simon Sinek and had to share it with you.  I want to draw out some of these ideas and apply them to project leadership and project management.

And by the way, he gave the 'I have a dream' speech, not the 'I have a plan' speech. ~Sinek

A great example of this principle in action for projects are implementations of particular methodologies driven by calls for efficiency or because all of the hip kids are doing it.  Countless organizational change iniatives fall prey to this same failure of trying to sell what and how, not why.

How many of us have had process change around us because someone thought it would be a good idea, but we have no idea why the change is happening or why we should care?

"...we follow those who lead not because we have to, but because we want to." ~Sinek

If you adopt agile or kanban or whatever whiz-bang method of working, are your teams and organization following because they have to, or because they want to?  Have you sold them first on the why? 

I think this is an area I can improve on, as I'm sure almost all of us can.  I have implemented agile methods of working with teams without any more justification then "trust me, I think this will really help us work better."  I was luck in that my teams have usually had some knowledge of agile and were positive on the general approach.  So I was relying on their own internal reasons for why in those cases.

Below is my own representation of Sinek's "Golden Circle".  The normal method of selling stakeholders and project teams on a project vision is to start with the what, figure out the how, and probably barely touch on the why.  For many project team members, the best answer they have to "why?" is "because it's my job."

On the other hand, the inspiring arrow shows a project leader who sells their stakeholders and teams on the core "why?" question first, by answering it in a compelling way.  From then on, the details of what, how, when, etc. get worked out in light of the primary answer to "why?" - The Goal.

The Golden Circle

Please check out his TED talk below. I think you'll enjoy it.

People don't buy what you do. They buy why you do it. ~Sinek

 

Like this? Share it!

Posted on: March 26, 2011 07:12 PM | Permalink

Comments (8)

Please login or join to subscribe to this item
avatar
Wai Mun Koo PMO Director| Intergraph PP&M Singapore, Singapore
Couldn't agree more. As a matter of fact, those that started off with 'What' probably don't even know 'Why' in the first place.

avatar
Josh Nankivel Engineering Project Manager| Apple Sioux Falls, Sd, United States
Absolutely! Or at least, the perceived or assumed 'Why' doesn't match reality. And in projects, that means you end up producing something that doesn't really solve the core problem.

avatar
Edwin Mina Taguig, Philippines
"Those who starts with why that have the ability to inspire those around them or find others who inspires them" - great way to end such facilitation as to why its much more beneficial to start with the Why, then the How and lastly the What. Many tnx!

avatar
Wai Mun Koo PMO Director| Intergraph PP&M Singapore, Singapore
Josh, you are right that sometimes, the 'Why' is lost along the way and things starts to deviate wildly. It is important for us to constantly check back to see if the original purpose is still intact and if we are delivering it in an efficient and ethical way.

avatar
Leam Hall PM Apprentice| Smartronix/DoD Pulaski, Va, United States
Josh, very good! I don't see the TED talk though...

Leam

avatar
cristian rosu Global Business Manager| MAHLE GmbH Regensburg, Germany
Not starting with Why seems to be one of the most frequent reason for project failure. If you go to nowhere then any road takes you there. I have seen many organisational changes being wrongly started with what in Kotter’s 8 steps change model should be step number 5. Skipping the former steps ‘makes things much easier’ because nobody knows what the intention was. Visionary leadership is very powerful as attracts volunteers and volunteers are considered as having the bravest heart of all.

avatar
Elizabeth Harrin Director| RebelsGuideToPM.com London, England, United Kingdom
Leam, you can get all the TED talks through iTunes or through smartphone apps, if that helps.

avatar
Josh Nankivel Engineering Project Manager| Apple Sioux Falls, Sd, United States
Direct link to the TED Talk

@cristian - It seems we do jump to the "What" very often...customers like to start with what they need...features, functionality...it's up to us to ask "Why" when it's not there. I like to say "Help me understand what you will use this for." - sometimes the context is everything, and you can figure out a way to meet their needs better with less effort and/or in a more effective manner.

Thanks for the comments everyone!!

Please Login/Register to leave a comment.

ADVERTISEMENTS

"Anyone can become angry - that is easy, but to be angry with the right person, to the right degree, at the right time, for the right purpose and in the right way - that is not easy."

- Aristotle

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsors