, Successive Wave Planning, and Sprint Planning.webp)
Planning is one of the key pillars for the success of any project, regardless of its size or complexity. Over the years, various methodologies have been developed to organize and execute projects efficiently while minimizing risks. Among these, the Last Planner System (LPS), Successive Wave Planning, and Sprint Planning stand out. Each of these methods has its own characteristics and is more suitable for specific contexts. In this article, we will explore the details of these three planning methods, their advantages, disadvantages, and the types of projects for which they are most appropriate.
1. Last Planner System (LPS)
The Last Planner System (LPS) was originally developed in the construction industry and is an approach focused on collaborative and detailed short-term planning. The core idea of LPS is to involve all stakeholders in the planning process, from leadership to operational teams. The method is centered on executing weekly tasks, with the team committing to delivering certain activities within a week.
LPS Principles:
- Collaborative Planning: Everyone involved in the project execution process participates in the planning, focusing on realistic commitments and the ability to deliver.
- Short-Term Focus: Planning is done based on weekly cycles, making it possible to adapt to unforeseen events quickly.
- Commitment to Execution: Each team member takes responsibility for completing their activities on time, ensuring greater predictability in deliveries.
Advantages:
- High transparency and progress control.
- Reduces waste by aligning team expectations.
- Allows for continuous identification and resolution of problems.
Disadvantages:
- Requires a high level of collaboration and constant communication, which can be a challenge in large projects or dispersed teams.
- Demands detailed management of short-term activities.
Example of use: Construction projects, where high levels of coordination and execution control are necessary.
2. Successive Wave Planning
Successive Wave Planning is a strategic approach that divides the project into large phases or waves of work. For each wave, detailed planning is performed for the activities to be delivered during that cycle. Once one wave is completed, the planning for the next wave is reviewed, allowing for adjustments as the project progresses.
Principles of Successive Wave Planning:
- Execution Phases: Work is divided into large time blocks, with incremental deliveries organized in waves.
- Periodic Reviews: After each delivery wave, progress is reviewed, and adjustments are made as needed.
- Long-Term Vision: Planning for each wave is generally done in advance, aligning with the overall goals of the project.
Advantages:
- Suitable for large-scale projects or those with a broad scope.
- Allows for strategic adjustments between waves.
- Facilitates coordination in complex projects, such as large infrastructure works or product launches.
Disadvantages:
- Less detailed in the short term, which can lead to uncertainties if not executed well.
- Requires accurate forecasting of resources and timelines for each phase.
Example of use: Infrastructure projects or new product launches, where work is done in large blocks with sequential deliveries.
3. Sprint Planning (Scrum)
Sprint Planning is a central technique in agile methodologies, particularly in Scrum. In this model, the work is divided into small work cycles called "sprints," which typically last 2 to 4 weeks. Each sprint results in an incremental delivery, and at the end of each cycle, the team reviews the progress, makes adjustments, and plans the next cycle.
Principles of Sprint Planning:
- Short and Iterative Cycles: The project is divided into short cycles with continuous reviews.
- Incremental Deliveries: At the end of each sprint, the team delivers a feature or improvement that can be evaluated.
- Continuous Collaboration: Scrum promotes constant communication between all parties involved, with the team, Product Owner, and Scrum Master working closely together.
Advantages:
- High flexibility, allowing for continuous adjustments throughout the project's lifecycle.
- Continuous feedback from stakeholders, helping to iteratively improve the product.
- Ideal for dynamic and fast-evolving environments, such as software development.
Disadvantages:
- Can be difficult to scale in very large projects without adapting additional frameworks (like SAFe).
- Requires constant commitment and communication between all involved parties.
Example of use: Software development, innovative products, and other agile projects requiring quick deliveries and frequent adjustments.
Comparative Table of the Three Planning Methods
Conclusion
The choice of planning method depends on the type and complexity of the project. The Last Planner System (LPS) is ideal for projects that require a high level of coordination and daily commitment, such as in the construction sector. Successive Wave Planning is more suitable for large projects with sequential phases, such as infrastructure or product launches. Meanwhile, Sprint Planning (Scrum) is the best option for agile and dynamic projects, especially in software development, where continuous feedback and rapid adaptation are essential. Understanding the characteristics and needs of your project will help select the most effective planning method to ensure the successful delivery of the project.
