Project Management

Support to Develop

by
This blog addresses management-related topics and has three areas of focus: 1. Technical skills; 2. Competencies in the field of interpersonal relations and communication (including personal organization and delegation, leadership, teamwork, conflict resolution, conducting meetings, and negotiation); and 3. Strategy (including diagnosis, strategic guidelines, and implementation).4.Technology
Career Development | Interpersonal Skills | Leadership | Strategy | Talent Management | show all posts

About this Blog

RSS

Recent Posts

The Emerging Tensions of Adaptive Governance

From Statistical Patterns to Operational Judgment

ORGANIZATIONAL MEMORY & DECISION CONTINUITY

RESPONSIBLE DECISION ARCHITECTURE™

Decision Architecture Under Pressure

Categories

Agile, Career Development, Career Development, Career Development, Career Development, Career Development, Career Development, Career Development, Career Development, Career Development, Career Development, Career Development, Career Development, Career Development, Career Development, Career Development, Career Development, Career Development, Career Development, Career Development, Career Development, Career Development, Career Development, Career Development, Career Development, Career Development, Career Development, Career Development, Career Development, Career Development, Career Development, Career Development, Career Development, Career Development, Career Development, Career Development, Career Development, Career Development, Career Development, Career Development, Career Development, Career Development, Career Development, Career Development, Career Development, Career Development, Career Development, Career Development, Career Development, Career Development, Career Development, Career Development, Career Development, Career Development, Career Development, Career Development, Career Development, Career Development, Career Development, Career Development, Career Development, Career Development, Career Development, Career Development, Career Development, Career Development, Career Development, Career Development, Career Development, Career Development, Career Development, Career Development, Career Development, Career Development, Career Development, Career Development, Career Development, Interpersonal Skills, Interpersonal Skills, Interpersonal Skills, Interpersonal Skills, Interpersonal Skills, Interpersonal Skills, Interpersonal Skills, Interpersonal Skills, Interpersonal Skills, Interpersonal Skills, Interpersonal Skills, Interpersonal Skills, Interpersonal Skills, Interpersonal Skills, Interpersonal Skills, Interpersonal Skills, Interpersonal Skills, Interpersonal Skills, Interpersonal Skills, Interpersonal Skills, Interpersonal Skills, Interpersonal Skills, Interpersonal Skills, Interpersonal Skills, Interpersonal Skills, Interpersonal Skills, Interpersonal Skills, Interpersonal Skills, Interpersonal Skills, Interpersonal Skills, Interpersonal Skills, Interpersonal Skills, Interpersonal Skills, Interpersonal Skills, Interpersonal Skills, Interpersonal Skills, Interpersonal Skills, Interpersonal Skills, Interpersonal Skills, Interpersonal Skills, Interpersonal Skills, Interpersonal Skills, Interpersonal Skills, Interpersonal Skills, Interpersonal Skills, Interpersonal Skills, Interpersonal Skills, Interpersonal Skills, Interpersonal Skills, Interpersonal Skills, Interpersonal Skills, Interpersonal Skills, Interpersonal Skills, Interpersonal Skills, Interpersonal Skills, Interpersonal Skills, Interpersonal Skills, Interpersonal Skills, Interpersonal Skills, Interpersonal Skills, Interpersonal Skills, Interpersonal Skills, Interpersonal Skills, Interpersonal Skills, Interpersonal Skills, Interpersonal Skills, Interpersonal Skills, Interpersonal Skills, Interpersonal Skills, Interpersonal Skills, Interpersonal Skills, Interpersonal Skills, Interpersonal Skills, Interpersonal Skills, Interpersonal Skills, Interpersonal Skills, Leadership, Leadership, Leadership, Leadership, Leadership, Leadership, Leadership, Leadership, Leadership, Leadership, Leadership, Leadership, Leadership, Leadership, Leadership, Leadership, Leadership, Leadership, Leadership, Leadership, Leadership, Leadership, Leadership, Leadership, Leadership, Leadership, Leadership, Leadership, Leadership, Leadership, Leadership, Leadership, Leadership, Leadership, Leadership, Leadership, Leadership, Leadership, Leadership, Leadership, Leadership, Leadership, Leadership, Leadership, Leadership, Leadership, Leadership, Leadership, Leadership, Leadership, Leadership, Leadership, Leadership, Leadership, Leadership, Leadership, Leadership, Leadership, Leadership, Leadership, Leadership, Leadership, Leadership, Leadership, Leadership, Leadership, Leadership, Leadership, Leadership, Leadership, Leadership, Leadership, Leadership, Leadership, Leadership, Leadership, Leadership, Strategy, Strategy, Strategy, Strategy, Strategy, Strategy, Strategy, Strategy, Strategy, Strategy, Strategy, Strategy, Strategy, Strategy, Strategy, Strategy, Strategy, Strategy, Strategy, Strategy, Strategy, Strategy, Strategy, Strategy, Strategy, Strategy, Strategy, Strategy, Strategy, Strategy, Strategy, Strategy, Strategy, Strategy, Strategy, Strategy, Strategy, Strategy, Strategy, Strategy, Strategy, Strategy, Strategy, Strategy, Strategy, Strategy, Strategy, Strategy, Strategy, Strategy, Strategy, Strategy, Strategy, Strategy, Strategy, Strategy, Strategy, Strategy, Strategy, Strategy, Strategy, Strategy, Strategy, Strategy, Strategy, Strategy, Strategy, Strategy, Strategy, Strategy, Strategy, Strategy, Strategy, Strategy, Strategy, Strategy, Sustainability, Talent Management, Talent Management, Talent Management, Talent Management, Talent Management, Talent Management, Talent Management, Talent Management, Talent Management, Talent Management, Talent Management, Talent Management, Talent Management, Talent Management, Talent Management, Talent Management, Talent Management, Talent Management, Talent Management, Talent Management, Talent Management, Talent Management, Talent Management, Talent Management, Talent Management, Talent Management, Talent Management, Talent Management, Talent Management, Talent Management, Talent Management, Talent Management, Talent Management, Talent Management, Talent Management, Talent Management, Talent Management, Talent Management, Talent Management, Talent Management, Talent Management, Talent Management, Talent Management, Talent Management, Talent Management, Talent Management, Talent Management, Talent Management, Talent Management, Talent Management, Talent Management, Talent Management, Talent Management, Talent Management, Talent Management, Talent Management, Talent Management, Talent Management, Talent Management, Talent Management, Talent Management, Talent Management, Talent Management, Talent Management, Talent Management, Talent Management, Talent Management, Talent Management, Talent Management, Talent Management, Talent Management, Talent Management, Talent Management, Talent Management, Talent Management, Talent Management

Date

Happy Holidays and Best Wishes for a Strong Year Ahead

linkedin twitter facebook Request to reuse this  


As we come to the close of another year, I would like to extend my warmest wishes to all members of the ProjectManagement.com community.

This has been a year of significant change, reflection, and learning for our profession.
Across different regions, industries, and roles, project professionals have continued to navigate complexity, adapt to new realities, and deliver value in increasingly dynamic environments.

May the holiday season offer a moment to pause, reconnect, and reflect on the lessons learned throughout the year.
And may the year ahead bring clarity, resilience, and renewed purpose to the work we do together.

Thank you for being part of this global community and for contributing to the ongoing evolution of project management.

Wishing you happy holidays and a strong, meaningful year ahead.

Kind regards,

Luis Abreu Branco
Posted on: December 23, 2025 04:20 AM | Permalink | Comments (2)

Why Governance Keeps Growing While Leadership Keeps Shrinking

linkedin twitter facebook Request to reuse this  


How Organizations Replaced Decision with Structure and What It Cost Them


Introduction: A Silent Organizational Trade-Off

Across modern organizations, a paradox has become impossible to ignore.
We have never had:

  • So many governance frameworks,
  • So many policies, committees, and controls,
  • So many compliance mechanisms,
  • So many reporting and oversight structures.
And yet, at the same time:

  • Decisions take longer,
  • Responsibility is harder to locate,
  • Leaders hesitate,
  • Execution fragments,
  • And accountability dissolves into process.
This is not accidental.

Governance has grown precisely as leadership has retreated.

And in many organizations, structure has quietly replaced decision.

The Comfort of Structure, the Discomfort of Leadership

Leadership is uncomfortable by nature.
It requires:

  • Choosing under uncertainty,
  • Acting with incomplete information,
  • Accepting personal responsibility,
  • Risking error,
  • And standing visibly behind a decision.
Governance, by contrast, offers safety:

  • Shared responsibility,
  • Distributed accountability,
  • Documented alignment,
  • Procedural legitimacy,
  • Protection against blame.
Over time, organizations learned an unspoken lesson:

Structure feels safer than leadership.

So they invested heavily in governance, not to enable leadership, but to reduce exposure to it.

How Decision Was Replaced by Structure

The substitution did not happen overnight.
It happened through a series of subtle shifts:

The language changed too:

  • From deciding to aligning,
  • From leading to facilitating,
  • From owning outcomes to following process.
What was lost was not control.
What was lost was ownership.

Why Leadership Shrinks in Governed Systems

Leadership shrinks when systems send one clear signal:

“It is safer not to decide.”

This happens when:

  • Mistakes are punished more than indecision,
  • Incentives reward compliance over judgment,
  • Escalation is safer than resolution,
  • Consensus is valued over clarity,
  • Leaders are blamed but not empowered.
In such environments, governance does not support leadership.
It crowds it out.

Governance as a Defense Mechanism

In theory, governance exists to:

  • Define boundaries,
  • Protect stakeholders,
  • Ensure accountability,
  • Enable sustainable value creation.
In practice, when leadership weakens, governance takes on a different role:

It becomes a defense mechanism.

  • Against uncertainty
  • Against risk
  • Against visibility
  • Against responsibility
More rules appear where judgment disappears.
More process appears where trust erodes.

The organization becomes safe, but also slow, reactive, and inward-looking.

The Hidden Costs of Replacing Leadership

The costs are rarely immediate, but they are systemic:

  • Decision latency increases
  • Innovation slows
  • Execution fragments
  • Talented leaders disengage or leave
  • Risk moves outside the organization
  • Learning collapses into reporting
What remains is activity without direction, movement without leadership.
Governance keeps expanding, trying to compensate for the very capability it helped suppress.

Governance Is Not the Enemy, Confusion Is

This is not an argument against governance.

Strong governance is necessary:

  • To protect integrity,
  • To ensure fairness,
  • To prevent abuse,
  • To align strategy and execution.
But governance was never meant to replace leadership.

Governance defines the frame.
Leadership exercises judgment within it.

When that distinction collapses, organizations confuse control with competence, and process with purpose.

Reclaiming Leadership Without Abandoning Governance

The way forward is not less governance.

It is clearer leadership.

That requires:
  • Restoring decision ownership,
  • Making authority explicit,
  • Protecting leaders who decide in good faith,
  • Treating error as learning, not failure,
  • Reconnecting decision with reality.
Leadership is not domination.

It is responsibility for decisions that cannot be deferred.

Conclusion: What Is at Stake

Governance grows when leadership retreats.

But organizations do not thrive on structure alone.

They thrive when:
  • Ethics guide behavior,
  • Integration enables coherent action,
  • And leadership accepts the burden of decision.
Without leadership, governance becomes administration of decline.

With leadership, governance becomes what it was always meant to be:

An enabler of responsible, human judgment in complex systems.
Posted on: December 22, 2025 10:47 AM | Permalink | Comments (2)

Ethics by Design: Why New Forms of Work Demand New Ethical Architecture

linkedin twitter facebook Request to reuse this  


Work is no longer defined solely by human action.

Today, value is created inside hybrid systems where humans, cognitive agents (AI), and robots operate together, sensing, deciding, acting, and learning at different speeds and with different forms of autonomy.
This transformation is not theoretical.

It is already shaping how projects are planned, how decisions are made, and how responsibility is distributed.

And it raises a question most organizations are still avoiding:

If work is now designed as a hybrid system, why is ethics still treated as an afterthought?

1. New Forms of Work Create New Moral Surfaces
When AI and automation become active participants in workflows, ethics does not disappear, it multiplies.
Hybrid Human–Agent–Robot teams introduce:

  • Distributed decision-making
  • Algorithmic influence without explicit intent
  • Actions executed faster than human reflection
  • Responsibility spread across humans, agents, and systems
These conditions create what we can call new moral surfaces:

  • Points where decisions affect people, trust, safety, fairness, or outcomes, even when no single human consciously chose the result.
The absence of ethical design does not create neutrality.

It creates unmanaged ethical risk.

2. Why Traditional Ethics Approaches Are No Longer Enough
Most professional ethics frameworks were built for a different reality:

  • Human-led decisions
  • Clear chains of authority
  • Linear accountability
  • Post-action evaluation
But hybrid work environments are:

  • Continuous
  • Non-linear
  • Distributed
  • Accelerated by AI
In this context, ethics cannot remain:

  • A static document
  • A compliance checklist
  • A once-a-year training
  • A personal virtue disconnected from system design
Ethics must evolve from guidance to architecture.

3. Ethics as Work Design, Not Compliance
In modern work environments:

  • Autonomy without ethical boundaries becomes risk
  • Speed without reflection amplifies errors
  • Intelligence without accountability erodes trust
That is why ethics must be embedded by design:

  • In workflows
  • In decision loops
  • In AI autonomy boundaries
  • In escalation rules
  • In feedback and learning cycles
Just as we design for performance, safety, or quality, we must now design for ethical coherence.

Ethics is no longer something we “apply” after decisions.

It is something we build into how decisions happen.

4. Agentic AI Makes Ethical Design Non-Optional
Agentic AI introduces contextual autonomy:

  • Systems that interpret intent, anticipate risks, and act within predefined boundaries.
This makes three principles unavoidable:
  1. Transparency - decisions must be explainable
  2. Human accountability - responsibility cannot be delegated to algorithms
  3. Continuous verification - ethical impact must be reviewed, not assumed
Without these principles embedded into work design, organizations risk creating systems that are efficient, but ethically blind.

5. Ethical Operating Loops for Hybrid Teams
In hybrid environments, decisions occur at multiple speeds:

  • Human
  • Algorithmic
  • Automated
This requires ethical operating loops, not ethical slogans.

One example is the RCPCV™ decision cycle:

  • Recollect — data, signals, context
  • Consult — affected people and AI insights
  • Process (Think) — critical reasoning and bias awareness
  • Communicate — clarity, intent, responsibility
  • Verify — real-world impact and learning
Such loops align naturally with:

  • PMI’s 2025 Code of Ethics
  • Ethical Decision-Making Frameworks
  • NIST AI Risk Management principles
  • Emerging regulatory expectations (e.g., EU AI Act)
The key is not the label, it is the design intent:

  • Ethics operating at the same speed as work.
6. From Ethics Awareness to Ethics Capability
As project professionals, we certify:

  • Methodologies
  • Tools
  • Delivery competence
  • Governance structures
Yet in environments where:
  • AI influences decisions
  • Automation executes actions
  • Teams operate across human–machine boundaries
Ethical maturity becomes a core professional capability, not a personal preference.

Technique without ethics is risk.
Ethics without practice is fragile.

The evolution of work naturally leads to a new question:

  • Should ethical capability be treated with the same rigor as technical capability?
This is not a critique.
It is a consequence of structural change.

7. Conclusion — Ethics Is the Missing Infrastructure of Hybrid Work
AI does not eliminate the need for ethics.

It amplifies the consequences of its absence.

The future of work will not be decided by tools alone, but by:

  • How responsibility is designed
  • How decisions are governed
  • How trust is protected
  • How learning is embedded
Ethics is no longer a boundary condition.
It is core infrastructure.

AI scales capability.
Ethics scales trust.

And without trust, there is no team, only coordinated risk.

Final Reflection
As work becomes more intelligent, autonomous, and hybrid, one question remains unavoidable:

  • Is ethics in your organization a document, or is it designed into how work actually happens?
Note: This reflection is personal and independent, based on my study of PMI’s published materials, and does not represent an official PMI position.

References:
  • Project Management Institute. (2025). PMI Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct
  • National Institute of Standards and Technology. (2023). AI Risk Management Framework
  • European Union. (2025). Artificial Intelligence Act
  • Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The Knowledge-Creating Company
  • Senge, P. (2006). The Fifth Discipline
  • Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological Safety and Learning Behavior
  • Meadows, D. (2008). Thinking in Systems
  • Laloux, F. (2014). Reinventing Organizations
Posted on: December 19, 2025 09:08 AM | Permalink | Comments (1)

AI as a Team Member 3.0: Human–Agent–Robot and the New Forms of Work

linkedin twitter facebook Request to reuse this  


Work is changing faster than organizations can process, and often faster than leaders can adapt.

We are entering a new era:
Hybrid Human–Agent–Robot Teams™.

Technology is no longer a tool that sits outside the workflow.
It has become an active member of the team, with presence, agency, and autonomous influence in the flow of value.

So the core question is no longer:
“How do we use AI?”

The real question is:
“How do we work - and lead - when AI has voice, agency, and contextual autonomy inside the team?”

This is the new anatomy of work.

And it demands a new mindset, a new ethical foundation, and a new approach to Work Design.

1. Human–Agent–Robot: The New Anatomy of Work

Modern work blends three complementary forms of intelligence:

Humans -Consciousness, Ethics, Creativity

Intention • Purpose • Meaning • Context • Ethical judgment • Deep collaboration • Cultural sense-making • Relational learning

Cognitive Agents (AI) - Prediction, Analysis, Coordination

Language interpretation • Pattern recognition • Risk anticipation • Real-time decision support • Living documentation • Human–robot orchestration

Robots - Execution, Precision, Cadence

Physical/digital automation • High-frequency reliability • Safety • Repeatability • Elimination of dangerous or exhausting tasks

This is not science fiction.
It is the present becoming visible.

2. New Forms of Work = Intelligent Work Design

The integration of humans, agents, and robots is not a technology problem.

It is a Work Design problem.

New Forms of Work require:
• Flexible and reconfigurable teams
• Adaptive, living workflows
• Short learning cycles
• Dynamic roles (initiator, checker, explainer, arbiter, synthesizer)
• Clear autonomy boundaries for agents and robots
• Intentional alignment rituals
• Psychological safety
• Embedded ethical governance
• Transparency in algorithmic decisions
• Coherent organizational intent

New forms of work do not “happen.”
They are designed and redesigned continuously.

3. Agentic AI: The Nervous System of Modern Teams

AI no longer simply responds to commands.

It acts with contextual autonomy, across three levels:

Level 1 - Assistive
Zero autonomy. AI responds, summarizes, executes.

Level 2 - Collaborative
Partial autonomy. AI suggests, anticipates patterns, identifies tensions and risks.

Level 3 - Contextually Autonomous
AI interprets intent, reads variables, acts within ethical and operational boundaries — always with human fallback.

AI does not replace teams.
AI amplifies teams.

4. Copilots, Chatbots, and NLP - Language Is the New Operating System

With advanced NLP, language becomes the universal interface of collaboration:
• Copilots capture knowledge in real time
• Meetings turn into structured documentation
• Ideas become visual maps
• Misalignment becomes clarity
• Cognitive noise becomes shared understanding
• Humans, agents, and robots connect into one workflow

Language is now the operating system of intelligent collaboration.

5. SECI 2.0™ + AI - Knowledge That Breathes

The SECI 2.0™ model transforms knowledge into an organizational breathing cycle:
Socialization → AI captures signals, tensions, and context
Externalization → copilots turn conversations into structured knowledge
Combination → agents merge data, narratives, and scenarios
Internalization → real-time learning embedded into work itself

Knowledge stops being static documentation.
It becomes living, adaptive, continuous.

6. Cognitive Agility™ - The Essential Competence of Hybrid Work

Hybrid teams require a new mental fluency:
• Pattern recognition
• Clarity amid complexity
• Intentional action
• Rapid adaptation
• Integrating AI without losing humanity
• Balancing data with meaning
• Navigating paradoxes

Cognitive Agility™ is the core muscle of future-ready teams.

7. RCPCV™ — Ethical Decision-Making in Hybrid Environments

Decisions now occur at multiple speeds: human, robotic, and algorithmic.
RCPCV™ ensures moral coherence:
R — Recollect → data, weak signals, perceptions, context
C — Consult → affected people + AI-generated insights
P — Process (Think) → critical reasoning, foresight, bias awareness
C — Communicate → clarity, intent, responsibility
V — Verify → real-world impact, learning, regeneration

AI accelerates.
RCPCV™ protects.
Leadership integrates.

8. The Human Edge - The Competitive Advantage AI Cannot Replace

Even in an AI-augmented world, human capabilities define outcomes:
Purpose • Ethics • Trust • Deep Learning • Psychological Safety • Sensibility • Discernment • Culture • Intention • Impact •Technology amplifies.

Humans direct.

9. The Human–Agent–Robot Ethical Contract

Hybrid teams require a living ethical contract built on:
  1. Transparency
  2. Final Human Accountability
  3. Algorithmic Justification
  4. Data Protection & Intentional Use
  5. Continuous Verification
Without an ethical contract, there is no trust.
Without trust, there is no team.

10. Conclusion - Work Has Changed. Leadership Must Change Too.

AI does not replace teams.
It replaces outdated ways of working.

The future belongs to those who can:
Design intelligent work
Integrate humans, agents, and robots
Cultivate the human edge
Learn continuously
Make ethical decisions
Lead with consciousness
Create sustainable, regenerative value

So the central question becomes:
Is AI in your organization just a tool, or already a team member?

References:
Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The Knowledge-Creating Company. Oxford University Press.
Senge, P. (2006). The Fifth Discipline. Doubleday.
Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. IJITDL.
Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior. ASQ.
Jurafsky, D., & Martin, J. (2023). Speech and Language Processing (3rd ed.).
Vaswani, A., et al. (2017). Attention is all you need. NeurIPS.
Valentine, M., & Bernstein, M. (2025). Flash Teams 2.0. MIT Work Design Lab.
Appelo, J. (2025). Human–Robot–Agent.
Meadows, D. (2008). Thinking in Systems. Chelsea Green.
Laloux, F. (2014). Reinventing Organizations. Nelson Parker.
Covey, S. (2006). The Speed of Trust. Free Press.
Project Management Institute. (2025). PMI Code of Ethics.
National Institute of Standards and Technology. (2023). AI Risk Management Framework.
McKinsey & Company. (2024). Future of Work Report.
Boston Consulting Group. (2023). Adaptive Work Design.
European Union. (2025). Artificial Intelligence Act (Regulation (EU).
Posted on: December 17, 2025 10:42 AM | Permalink | Comments (0)

It’s Time: PMI Should Create an Official Ethics Certification, and Make It Mandatory.

linkedin twitter facebook Request to reuse this  


We now have the 2025 Code of Ethics, the EDMF, the Practitioner Ethics Toolkit, and the Chapter Board Ethics Toolkit.
This is, without question, the strongest ethical ecosystem PMI has ever published.
But one decisive step is still missing.
Ethics must stop being just a document, and become a certification.
And PMI should lead that change.

It makes little sense for our profession to have highly rigorous technical certifications (PMP®, PMI-ACP® PMI-PMOCP™) while the foundation that sustains everything - ethical conduct - has no formal certification at all.

The time has come for a structural shift:
1. PMI should create an Official Ethics Certification.
A certification based on the 2025 Code, the EDMF, real dilemmas, conflicts of interest, Chapter governance, AI ethics, and sustainability ethics.

2. This certification should be mandatory for ALL other PMI certifications.
Before becoming PMP, ACP, RMP, or PMO-CP, every professional should demonstrate:
- Ethical maturity
- Critical judgement
- Conscious decision-making
- Responsibility and integrity

Technique without ethics is risk.
Ethics without technique can be developed.
The hierarchy is obvious.

3. All Chapter Board members MUST be certified in Ethics.
Leading a Chapter is not only about delivering activities, it is about stewarding trust, fairness, ethical communication, conflicts of interest, and responsible governance.

Making ethics certification mandatory for Board Members would:
- Protect the community
- Increase transparency
- Reduce internal conflicts
- Professionalize volunteer leadership
- Build global institutional maturity
- Strengthen PMI’s reputation worldwide

4. This is the natural next step in the evolution of our profession.
If we want ethics to be more than words, we must treat it the same way we treat methodology:
- With learning, rigor, evaluation, and continuous practice.

The profession does not advance by updating guides alone.
It advances when we elevate conscience, conduct, and responsibility.

PMI now has a historic opportunity:
To make ethics its most important certification.

To explore PMI’s official ethics resources:
PMI members’ ethics commitments

Note: This reflection is personal and independent, based on my study of PMI’s published materials, and does not represent an official PMI position.
Posted on: December 15, 2025 09:03 AM | Permalink | Comments (8)
ADVERTISEMENTS

"He felt that his whole life was some kind of dream, and he sometimes wondered whose it was and whether they were enjoying it."

- Douglas Adams

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsors







Vendor Events

See all Vendor Events

Newsletters

Jun 3: The Career Problem Facing New PMs
May 20: Your PM Career as a Project Life Cycle
May 13: The Big Lie After Layoffs

See all newsletters