Making sense of how YOUR character strengths can help
| Photo by Santi Vedrí on Unsplash
Jo works in education in the U.K. Her signature character strengths are Fairness, Humor, Judgment, Social Intelligence and Prudence. Her lesser strengths – on a typical day – are Gratitude, Hope, Spirituality, Appreciation and Self-Regulation. As schools close their doors during this crisis, and families face the challenge of being at home, reduced income and still giving their children an education, she and her colleagues are working tirelessly to create a consistent learning environment. When asked how things are going, she said, “I have never worked as hard in my life!” Between work commitments, juggling a family of six people stuck in the house, managing updates, checking in on family and friends, it is a whirlwind of calls, texts, emails … So, I asked her how strengths help:
Of the first three strengths Jo named, two were lesser strengths for her. We may believe that our lesser strengths are inaccessible or absent. Tips for coping:
Photo by Frank Busch on Unsplash
|
The future is digital, but not in the way we think
|
The future is digital, but not in the way we think The question I get asked most often in conferences around capability building is, “What skills should I focus on, to be successful in a digital future”. I’ve always suspected that’s a loaded question. After all, if you ask a Global IT executive that question, you’re not expecting a response of “circus trapeze artist”, but most likely some variation of “computer science”. However, as an aside, are you really sure you want to ask any type of expert a question about the future? You see, when experts are wrong, they can be horribly off the mark. When experts go horribly wrong Consider these opinions from very reputable people about the future. “Television won’t be able to hold on to any market it captures after the first six months. People will soon get tired of staring at a plywood box every night.” — Darryl Zanuck, executive at 20th Century Fox, 1946 “The horse is here to stay but the automobile is only a novelty – a fad.” — President of the Michigan Savings Bank advising Henry Ford’s lawyer, Horace Rackham, not to invest in the Ford Motor Company, 1903 “The Americans have need of the telephone, but we do not. We have plenty of messenger boys.” — Sir William Preece, Chief Engineer, British Post Office, 1876 "I think there is a world market for maybe five computers." Thomas Watson, president of IBM, 1943 "There is no reason anyone would want a computer in their home." Ken Olsen, founder of Digital Equipment Corporation, 1977 Oops! You might charitably call these “a swing and a miss”. More bluntly, you might wonder what these guys were smoking when they said this. After all, these were all experts in their field. So, should we be asking any type of expert about the future? The future is digital. Seriously, everyone knows that the future is digital. But, what the best visionaries and change leaders know is that this statement cannot be taken literally. The risk with being literal is that you go down rabbit holes of technology in an attempt to find digital versions of products (digital ice cream?), services (digital dry cleaning?) or work processes (digital financial analysis?). To be fair, some of these are important ingredients for the digital world and they are future-oriented. However, they are all means to a digital end. What most successful change leaders do, is to understand the context of the world around them, and then deliberately go about creating the future by marrying their own capabilities with future trends. Where’s the future headed? So, what key context should we examine regarding the digital future? Here’s a few examples I’d like to share to make a point about a digital future. This is what technology will bring to future life as we know it. - Driverless cars, which were just a dream a few years ago, have gotten to the stage where children being born today may never need to apply for a driver’s license. - Between 40-50% of jobs in the manufacturing, transportation and retail sectors could be done by hardware or software robots in the next 15 years. - Even robots in manufacturing will be disrupted in the next 10 years, as 3D printing takes over. If you can print your PC or smartphone at home, you eliminate robots in the factory. - Certain news agencies already generate 90% of their short, pro-forma real-time news updates on sports and financial markets using software robots. Artificial Intelligence (AI), with some human journalist help will generate 90% of all news in 15 years. - Voice recognition is already 3 times faster and more accurate than typing. In the future, Natural Language Processing bots will understand and execute most of the day-to-day tasks at home and at work. - Deep Learning can already read your lips with more than 90% accuracy, while the average lip reader usually delivers 50% accuracy. - In 20 to 30 years, the cost of producing energy at home will be a fraction of the cost of buying it off the grid. - More importantly, it’s the consequences of cheap electricity that are more exciting. Cheap electricity means cheap drinking water, as energy allows you to process all kinds of water including sea water. - In the next 5 years, there will be apps that can tell by your facial expression if you’re lying. Imagine what that could do to the judicial system!
Wait! Don’t all these examples simply illustrate the criticality of building technical capabilities? No. Not necessarily. Let me share one final statistic to explain why. - Over the next decade, modern manufacturing in the US will create 3.5 million new jobs. But, up to 2 million high-tech manufacturing jobs may go unfilled for lack of higher-skilled factory workers. You read that right. In this case the gap will not be in IT programmer availability but in factory workers who know just enough digital technology to operate high-tech machines. Follow your passion, but in a high-tech way The future world will need lawyers, and bankers, and CEOs, and businesspeople, and teachers, and nurses, and sanitation workers, and cooks, and accountants, and priests, and factory and farm workers, and yes, politicians. Recent studies on the workforce of the future have demonstrated that beyond a technical digital skills shortage, the bigger skills gap will be related to right brained work. The future of the ice cream business isn’t necessarily a dystopian one where bits and bytes replace a snow cone, but in reimagining how we might better meet the need of ice cream consumers using digital technology. Design thinking, imagination, visual and intuitive product and service design, change management, bringing your organization along – these are all on the critical path to a digital future. Obviously, this doesn’t take away from the need for a minimum level of digital literacy. We will all need a certain minimum amount of high-tech WITHIN OUR RESPECTIVE FIELD. That technical knowledge doesn’t have to be a one-size-fits-all skill like AI programming. It must be relevant to your field. So, if your field of passion is say, teaching, then keep building capabilities in that area. But ensure that you study enough digital teaching skills so that you can be the most relevant leader within the teaching field.
|
Playing to your strengths as a leader.
” To lead people, walk beside them…” Lao Tzu |
How to Inspire Employees to Drive Change
|
Some time ago, I had the opportunity to build a house. My builder told me that the typical house takes 160 days to complete – from groundbreaking to moving day. He then warned me that because the house was 700 feet off the main road, construction would take longer. Just how much longer, he would not commit. I determined to reduce construction time. My plan was to stay engaged with the general contractor and treat the subcontractors like royalty. During construction, I went out to the house nearly every day. Often it was after work to evaluate progress and report findings to the general contractor. Normally the reports were positive. Occasionally there were small issues for him to address. One time there were electrical outlets in the wrong place; he fixed it. Once I found a wall six feet from where it was planned. The general contractor made it right and thanked me for identifying the issue so quickly. At times, I would go to the site early in the morning before work, or during my lunch break. During these times, I took coffee, water, donuts, cookies, or pizza for the subcontractors. Later, I learned that these gestures created a sense of purpose and appreciation among the subcontractors. They wanted to help people build their dreams. They wanted to do good work and they wanted to feel like they were a part of something bigger than 8 – 10 hours of labor a day. I also discovered later that this worked to my advantage as many extras were added – at no cost. There are two major lessons here. First, the sponsor of the project must be actively engaged in monitoring and guiding progress. Can you imagine the costs and delays if I hadn’t found the misplaced wall as early as I did? The second lesson is to engage and inspire your employees during change. I used donuts and coffee to share my passion for building the house in the woods, and in turn, the subcontractors felt like they were part of something bigger. You might say, “Well, Steve, this is a nice story, but so what? You expended a lot of time and energy to supervise the construction, a job you delegated to the general contractor. But what were the real benefits?” We moved into the house in 140 days, the house met specifications, and the project came in under budget. How many of your projects achieve these kinds of results? Call to Action: When you consider your next change initiative, be sure your sponsor plans time in her calendar to stay engaged with the project. Be sure she does more than attend the regular status meetings to stay informed. Instead, she can make a difference. She can talk to the employees doing the work or ask the project manager informally about progress. She can schedule lunches or other events during the project and not just to celebrate the end of the project.
|
Agility Quotient
| There have been very few instances in humanity's existence where the global need for agility is higher than what it has been in the past six months. This is at both a personal and organizational level. In fact, for this article, let’s consider agility at a personal level. Could we say that “agility” is a quality or characteristic? If so, it seems to be something we should measure and value similar to other personal qualities and characteristics. For example, consider intelligence quotient (IQ) and emotional intelligence (EQ). Both of these are measured amounts of how much intelligence or emotional intelligence a person has, respectively. I believe that one’s agility is a quality and characteristic of great value. Thus, we should understand, value, and know-how to assess one’s agility quotient (AQ), or one’s ability to swiftly adapt to the changing needs of customers, employees, and the marketplace. Why is AQ Needed? The rate of change is faster than ever. Disruption of organizations and industries is increasingly occurring. In fact, there are three rapidly increasing phenomena that all organizations are facing:
Together, this means that if organizations want to stay viable in the long run, they need the ability to adapt and pivot. And, in order for that to happen, organizations need individual employees that have the ability to quickly adapt and pivot: a high agility quotient. Low versus High Agility Quotient What sets apart someone with a high agility quotient from someone with a low agility quotient? At a basic level, someone with low AQ is someone who values certainty, consistency, and comfort. Often, the reason why individuals might possess such values is because they are focused on what is best and comfortable for them: a sense of safety and security. Someone with high AQ is someone who values learning, alternative perspectives, and personal disruption. Often, the reason why individuals might possess these values is because they are more concerned about (1) providing what is best for the customer, and (2) doing what is best for the long-term success for the organization, over and above a concern of what is best for themselves. Microsoft Example I think a great example of an organization that has helped employees make a significant positive shift in their AQ is Microsoft. When Satya Nadella took over as CEO, he found that Microsoft employees needed to be the smartest people in the room, which meant a lot of jockeying for power and position and an inability to be wrong and see different perspectives. They were more focused on ensuring stability for themselves than adapting to ensure value for their customers. As Satya Nadella set out to work on cultural change within Microsoft to become more agile, he promoted the idea that instead of being “know-it-alls,” they needed to become “learn-it-alls.” And, to promote this shift, he encouraged employees to meet more and more with their customers at their customer’s locations. They were to identify what needs they had and ways in which their products were falling short of what they needed. A natural byproduct of this is that Microsoft employees were coming back from meeting with their employees having learned something new, seeing a new perspective, and a willingness to disrupt themselves and what they were doing in order to better meet the needs and demands of their customers. The result of this has been a four-fold increase in market capitalization and stock price since Satya Nadella took over in 2004. It has been an incredible transformation! Improving Agility Quotient in Your Organization How do you take employees from having a low agility quotient to having a high agility quotient? At a foundational level, we have got to recognize that the difference between such individuals isn’t a difference in skill or ability, it is a difference in how they see and perceive their world around them. It is a difference in their mindsets. Mindsets: The Key to Agility There is a lot of information “out there” on mindsets. But, most of this information fails to identify specific mindsets necessary for agility. After scouring decades of research in a wide variety of disciplines. I have found that there are four sets of mindsets that have received 30+ years of research attention demonstrating that they influence how individuals think, learn, and behave (i.e., how agile they are). Each of these sets range on a continuum from less agile to more agile.
The table below demonstrates what research has found related to how these different mindsets affect how agile individuals are.
What is Your Agility Quotient? Does this give you a sense of your personal AQ level? Are there areas where you could improve in your AQ? What about your organization? Does your organization’s workforce have the collective mindsets that fuel agility? In my research, I have found that only 5% of people are in the top quartile for all four sets of mindsets. Also, I have assessed the mindsets of over 60 organizations and groups, and I have only found a handful that have two or more collective mindsets on the “high agility” side of the continuum. Improving Your and Your Workforce’s AQ If you want to become more agile, or if you want to improve your workforce’s agility, you are going to have to, at a fundamental level, shift how you and they see their world. In other words, you are going to have to focus on mindsets. |












_(cropped).jpg)


