Project Management

Random Thoughts

by
Uniting the passion for writing and project management

About this Blog

RSS

Recent Posts

Autonomous vehicles: when 90% done means nowhere near ready

The accidental path to Project Management

What history reveals about AI and the Project Manager profession

When results aren’t enough: Rethinking Leadership

The Sagrada Família: A living Project Management case study

Categories

74-343, Agile, Agile, Artificial Intelligence, basadur, Budget Management, Career Development, Certification, Change Management, Change; Change management; Team management, Chapter, Communications Management, Complexity, conceptualizer, Cost Management, data management, Decision Making, Estimating, Ethics, generator, Giga Projects, Goal Setting, Governance, Human touch, implementer, Leadership, Lessons Learned, machine learning, MS Project 2013, Negotation, New Practitioners, optimizer, Organizational behavior, Organizational Culture, personal growth, pharmaceutical; lifecyle management; agile; waterfall, PMI, Problem solving, Product Owner, Project Communication, Project Management, PSM I, PSPO, Resource Management, Risk Management, Scheduling, Scope Management, Scrum, self-development, Stakeholder management, Strategy, Teams, test, training, Volunteering

Date

When results aren’t enough: Rethinking Leadership

linkedin twitter facebook Request to reuse this  
We often label bad experiences at work as toxic leadership. It’s a convenient shortcut to explain disengagement or quiet resentment. But the more I reflect on it, the more the term itself starts to feel misleading.

Because if leadership is toxic, if if it consistently erodes trust and destroys long‑term value, should we still call it leadership?

To explore this question, I find it useful to strip leadership down to two fundamental dimensions.

A simple leadership matrix


Imagine leadership mapped across two axes:

  • Competence ➜ the ability to consistently turn intent into outcomes through sound judgment, clear decision-making and effective execution.
  • Human awareness ➜ An umbrella term that includes empathy, emotional intelligence, self‑awareness and the ability to understand how one’s actions affect others.
Human awareness and emotional intelligence are closely related, but not identical. Emotional intelligence is the capability to perceive and manage emotions: your own and others’. Human awareness is how that capability shows up in daily behavior: listening, recognizing limits, understanding context and treating people as thinking adults rather than interchangeable units.

Cross these two dimensions, and four leadership archetypes emerge.


1. HIGH COMPETENCE, HIGH HUMAN AWARENESS — THE TRUE LEADER


This is the quadrant most leadership books describe, and also the one people encounter least often.

These leaders are strong decision‑makers who understand the work deeply but they are grounded enough to know they don’t have all the answers. They hire people better than themselves, avoid micromanagement, and create clarity without crushing autonomy. They understand that suistainable success is a collective effort. Results matter, but so do the people producing them.

A commonly cited example is Richard Branson. He has repeatedly emphasized trust and putting people first, not as soft values, but as strategic ones. His leadership style reflects a belief that if you take care of people, performance follows.

This is leadership that compounds over time.

2. High competence, low human awareness — The Extractor


This quadrant is often confused with strong leadership.

These individuals are frequently visionaries: resilient, ambitious, intolerant of excuses, and unafraid of failure. When told something isn’t possible, they respond with “then figure it out.” They push boundaries and redefine industries.

But they do so by extracting relentlessly from the people around them.

In The Everything Store (Brad Stone’s book on Amazon), employees describe environments marked by extreme hours, constant pressure, public criticism and little recognition. Performance is demanded at all costs. People are interchangeable. Burnout is collateral damage.

Jeff Bezos is often cited in this category, as is Steve Jobs during certain periods of his career. Both delivered extraordinary results. Both also left behind well‑documented trails of exhausted, expendable talent.
These leaders don’t lack intelligence or drive. They lack restraint.

3. Low competence, high human awareness — The Beer Buddy


These leaders are easy to like.

They are approachable and genuinely attentive to how people feel. One-on-ones are friendly. Conversations often drift toward weekend plans, personal stories and shared frustrations.

The problem is not intent, it’s direction.

This archetype often shows up as managers who arrive at one-on-ones unprepared, asking questions like “What do you want to do?” without offering structure or a clear development perspective. People feel safe, but stagnant. Without competence, empathy alone becomes passive. Teams don't grow. Standards blur. Potential remains untapped.

Comfort replaces progress.

4. Low competence, low human awareness — The Detractor


This is the most damaging quadrant, and, unfortunately, not a rare one.

These leaders lack the skills to do the job and the awareness to recognize the impact they’re having. They create confusion, drain energy, and slow everything they touch.

Instead of extracting value, they subtract it.

Decisions are inconsistent. Feedback is absent or arbitrary. Accountability flows downward but never upward. Over time, capable people disengage or leave, not loudly, but deliberately.

What remains is inertia.

Why this distinction matters


Most people in organizations don’t choose their leaders, but they live with the consequences.

Understanding these patterns helps explain why some environments feel energizing while others feel depleting, even when the work itself is similar. It clarifies why results alone are a poor proxy for leadership quality, and why good intentions without capability still cause harm.

When we label all of this as leadership, we lose precision. And without precision, we normalize behaviors that should be questioned.

So… is toxic leadership really leadership?


Maybe the real issue isn’t toxic leadership at all.

Maybe it’s that we’ve expanded the definition of leadership so much that we’ve stopped interrogating it. We tolerate behaviors we would never accept from a peer, simply because they come wrapped in authority or justified by results. Competence without human awareness creates output, but not progress. Human awareness without competence creates comfort, but not growth.

Leadership only exists when both are present.

Everything else deserves a different name.

And once you see these patterns, the harder question becomes: which quadrant have you been operating in, and which one are you enabling?
Posted on: February 02, 2026 10:54 AM | Permalink | Comments (6)

What if Keanu Reeves ran your project?

Categories: Leadership

linkedin twitter facebook Request to reuse this  

In a previous post, we looked at Luis Enrique’s leadership style,  intense and authentic. That exploration led us to ask broader questions about what leadership is about, beyond what has been written in numerous books.

We often talk about what makes a good project manager: communication skills, time management (sense of urgency!), stakeholder engagement or risk management, among many others. These are important, even essential. But they aren’t the whole picture.

What if we looked beyond competence?

What if we imagined a project manager with not only the right skills but the right soul? This isn’t just about emotional intelligence. It’s about the human being behind the project manager — the person who shows up with values, resilience and compassion. Because at the end of the day, regardless of our role or personal wealth, we are all humans with an innate desire to cooperate, contribute, and connect.

On that note, let’s explore a thought-provoking idea: what if Keanu Reeves were a project manager? Not the actor per se, but the essence of how he moves through the world. The internet is full of reels and short clips celebrating how Reeves has navigated enormous personal tragedy with humility and dignity:

- The death of his child

- The passing of his partner

- The loss of his close friend River Phoenix

- Years of solitude and personal battles, including caring for his sister through leukemia

And yet, through all of this, he continues to give and treat others with respect, whether it’s sharing his earnings with crew members or waiting in line like anyone else. He doesn’t just survive hardship.

So what lessons could we draw from this “saintly” version of a project manager?

Grace under pressure

As just noted, Keanu Reeves is no stranger to tragedy. Yet, he remains grounded and composed. A “Keanu PM” wouldn’t lash out in a crisis or shift blame when things go wrong. They’d hold the team steady when the company changes project priorities for the third time in six months or when the vendor delays delivery again on critical equipment. Calm doesn’t mean passive — it means anchored.

Lesson: A truly great PM is emotionally resilient. They’re a calming force when others are storming.

Radical humility

Despite a net worth estimated at over $380 million, Reeves is known for taking the subway, carrying his own gear on set, helping strangers, and staying out of the spotlight. He’s gifted millions to stunt crews and quietly supported cancer research without attaching his name to it.

For project leadership, this translates into egoless management. The Keanu PM doesn’t need credit or control. They elevate the team, listen deeply, and let results speak for themselves.

Lesson: The best PMs make space for others to shine.

No preaching

There’s a moral clarity in how Reeves lives — respectful, professional, generous. He doesn’t grandstand, but he doesn’t compromise on what matters either.

For a PM, this might look like saying no to shortcuts that threaten quality. It might mean standing up for a team under unrealistic deadlines or pushing back when decisions are misaligned with values.

Lesson: A strong ethical compass is most powerful when it’s lived, not lectured.

Consistency over perfection

Saints aren’t flawless — they’re consistent. Reeves is known for his discipline: showing up for every role with the same humility and dedication, whether it’s Hamlet on stage or The Matrix on screen.

Likewise, the Keanu PM doesn’t need to be the smartest or fastest. They need to be the one who shows up fully every day, even when no one is watching. As the saying goes: "Quality is what you do when no one is watching."

Lesson: Trust is built through small, consistent acts of responsibility.

Silence (can be) golden

We live in a world of noise: slack notifications, back to back meetings, fires to put out... Silence is underrated.

The Keanu archetype brings something rare: stillness. Not inertia, but the ability to pause, reflect, and respond, instead of reacting. A mindful PM sees the bigger picture, reads the room, and leads from a place of groundedness.

Lesson: Strategic pauses are not a luxury — they’re a leadership necessity.

In a nutshell

If we imagined a saintly project manager — someone with impeccable character, quiet strength, and a deep sense of care — it might not look flashy. But it would be unforgettable.

Remember that quote: “People will forget what you said, but not how you made them feel.”

The Keanu Reeves of project management may never trend on LinkedIn or win a flashy award. But their teams would trust them. Their projects would last. And their leadership would echo far beyond the final deliverable.

Maybe that’s what real success looks like.

Posted on: August 05, 2025 10:01 AM | Permalink | Comments (4)

From the pitch to the project; Leadership that delivers

Categories: Leadership

linkedin twitter facebook Request to reuse this  

Whether or not you follow football (or soccer), moments of exceptional leadership have a way of cutting through context and resonating universally. One such moment unfolded after Paris Saint-Germain’s (PSG) 5–0 victory over Inter Milan in the Champions League final on May 31st. In his post-match interview, coach Luis Enrique delivered more than just comments — he offered a masterclass in leadership.

It was a timely reminder that leadership isn’t theoretical. It’s something you live, not just learn about in books. You can read hundreds of articles or attend workshops on leadership, but sometimes the clearest understanding comes from observing someone who leads with results — and substance.

Here are eight powerful leadership lessons I took from that interview — applicable far beyond sports, and particularly valuable for anyone steering complex projects to success.

🧠 Use of inclusive language builds Psychological Safety

Rather than framing the win as a personal achievement, Luis Enrique repeatedly used “we” — reinforcing the idea that success was shared. This subtle choice of words builds unity and fosters psychological safety, creating space for collective ownership and trust.

In project management, where team cohesion is vital, this mindset is essential. Success rarely hinges on individual brilliance alone. And in an environment like professional sports — often dominated by ego — such inclusive language is even more striking. It’s a reminder that even top performers thrive when their leader highlights team over self.

🌱 Spotting and nurturing potential drives long-term results

Luis Enrique is known for putting faith in young and emerging talent, not just proven stars. As project managers, we face the same choice: do we stick with the tried-and-tested, or do we recognize and develop potential?

Choosing the latter can unlock surprising, long-term value — and it’s what separates a task manager from a true leader.

Simon Sinek touches on this beautifully in Leaders eat last, a book that left a strong impression on me. He writes that great leaders create environments where people feel safe, trusted, and empowered — and where they grow as a result. That sense of responsibility for others’ development is what defines leadership at its core.

🎲 Acknowledging the role of luck brings humility

When asked about his team’s success, Enrique didn’t just highlight preparation or strategy — he acknowledged that luck also played a role. It was a humble, honest answer.

In project management, this humility is vital. No matter how meticulous our planning, external factors — market shifts, stakeholder dynamics, unexpected delays — can influence the outcome.

Seneca said it best: “Luck is what happens when preparation meets opportunity.” The best leaders understand this. They prepare rigorously but remain open to uncertainty, building flexibility and contingency into their plans.

🎯 Focusing on team goals builds trust

Luis Enrique isn’t chasing personal accolades. His focus is clearly on collective performance and long-term growth — not just headlines.

Project managers who prioritize team and project outcomes over personal credit build lasting trust. That trust creates an environment where collaboration can flourish.

The same principle applies to entrepreneurs. When the focus shifts from “How much can I gain?” to “How much value can I deliver?”, success tends to follow. Recognition can be a byproduct, but it shouldn't be the end goal.

🔍 Developing other leaders multiplies impact

A particularly telling moment was Enrique highlighting Ousmane Dembélé — a player who had often been overlooked, but who was instrumental in the win. Elevating others is a subtle yet powerful leadership move.

For PMs, this means empowering senior team members, giving them space to lead, and encouraging mentorship within the team. It’s how resilient, self-sufficient teams are built.

Too often, the “deputy” or second-in-command role is undervalued. But those individuals — the ones quietly making things happen — are essential to scaling leadership and ensuring continuity when you're not in the room.

🔥 Inspiring belief in the face of adversity

After the departure of star player Kylian Mbappé, many expected PSG to stumble. Instead, the team doubled down and thrived. That speaks volumes about the culture Enrique has built.

Projects are no different. Budget cuts, changing scopes, sudden resource losses — these can derail momentum. But great leaders keep the team grounded and optimistic, even when the landscape shifts.

As the saying goes: no one is irreplaceable. What matters is the collective mindset — and the ability of the leader to keep belief alive, no matter the circumstances.

🪫 Managing success is harder than chasing it

Luis Enrique made a compelling point: achieving success is one thing; managing it is another. After a project launch or key milestone, it’s tempting to relax. But that’s often when the real work begins.

For PMs, the post-delivery phase — whether it’s optimization, user adoption, or continuous improvement — demands just as much attention. Sustaining performance and maintaining trust is a discipline in itself.

💔 Leading with humanity deepens connection

Perhaps the most moving leadership lesson wasn’t tactical, but personal. Luis Enrique continues to lead with strength and grace despite the tragic loss of his daughter. His resilience and openness command deep respect.

In a professional world that often prizes detachment, leading with humanity is powerful. It creates loyalty, builds authentic relationships, and fosters psychological safety. Compassion isn’t weakness — it’s leadership at its most real.

Final thoughts

Leadership books offer structure and ideas. But when we see leadership under real pressure — in a high-stakes final, under the scrutiny of millions — we’re reminded what it actually looks like.

For project managers, Luis Enrique’s post-match interview wasn’t just a sports recap. It was a mirror. A reminder that leadership shows up in how we speak, how we decide, how we empower others, and how we carry ourselves when things go sideways.

🔅 What about you? Which of these traits resonate with you most? Are there other leadership moments — in or out of sport — that have stayed with you?

Posted on: July 29, 2025 06:15 AM | Permalink | Comments (2)

Project Management hits all the right notes. Lessons from “We are the world”

linkedin twitter facebook Request to reuse this  

In January 1985, a groundbreaking project brought together 46 of the most famous musicians in the world to record We are the world, a charity single to aid famine relief in Africa. Among the participants were icons like Stevie Wonder, Diana Ross, Bruce Springsteen, Ray Charles, Bob Dylan, Tina Turner, and Cyndi Lauper.

Spearheaded by Lionel Richie and Michael Jackson, and produced by Quincy Jones, the project achieved extraordinary success: over 20 million copies sold, more than $63 million raised, and a song that continues to inspire humanitarian efforts. This success was made possible by exceptional project management that transformed a star-studded gathering into a unified and impactful initiative.

The power of a great sponsor

No project succeeds without a strong sponsor, and Quincy Jones played this role to perfection. As the producer, Jones managed the project’s vision, coordinated logistics, and ensured the group stayed focused. He wielded influence, respect, and clarity to align the egos and energies of the artists. His ability to navigate the creative chaos while keeping the big picture in mind was pivotal in translating the project’s vision into reality.

Adherence to timelines

The stakes were high: the entire recording had to be completed in a single night, immediately following the American Music Awards. With a tight schedule and a studio filled with superstars, there was no room for delays. Strict planning and coordination ensured the recording was completed on time without compromising quality. This showcases how clear deadlines, coupled with disciplined execution, can keep even the most complex projects on track.

Stakeholder management and servant leadership

Managing an ensemble of superstars required diplomacy and servant leadership, qualities embodied by Lionel Richie and Michael Jackson. Both leaders prioritized the collective goal over personal glory, fostering a collaborative environment. A sign in the studio famously read, “Check your ego at the door,” setting the tone for teamwork.

Another example of humility came during the chorus: participants who couldn’t reach the high notes simply remained silent. This act of knowing and respecting one’s limits reinforced the principle that projects succeed when individuals contribute according to their strengths. Allowing the right person to perform each task ensured the final output was harmonious and polished.

Change and scope management

During the session, Stevie Wonder suggested incorporating African lyrics into the song. While the idea aligned with the theme, it posed risks to the project’s scope and messaging. After careful deliberation, the team clarified that We are the world was not just about Africa but a global call to action for everyone to help Africa. By revisiting the project’s purpose, they honored the spirit of collaboration while maintaining focus, showcasing exemplary scope management.

A blueprint for future success

Beyond its immediate impact, We are the world inspired other successful humanitarian efforts, such as Do they know it's Christmas? and Live Aid. The project demonstrated that well-managed collaboration could create lasting change, extending its influence beyond its original ambition.

Key takeaways

The success of We are the world was driven by great sponsorship, strict adherence to timelines, servant leadership, and effective scope management. These principles remind project managers to respect their teams, leverage individual strengths, and remain adaptable under pressure.

As the song reminds us, “We’re saving our own lives.” Project management is about making the critical choices that lead to transformative results. Let’s aim to make every project we lead as impactful as this unforgettable collaboration.

Posted on: November 26, 2024 04:44 AM | Permalink | Comments (1)

The unlikely success of Pretty Woman

linkedin twitter facebook Request to reuse this  

I recently tuned into a fascinating podcast about the making of the classic film "Pretty Woman." What struck me most was how this project, seemingly doomed from the start, turned into a blockbuster hit. This got me thinking about how some projects, despite facing numerous obstacles, can still achieve remarkable success. Here’s a dive into the chaotic yet triumphant journey of "Pretty Woman."

From the get-go, the production faced significant challenges. When shooting commenced, they had only secured 10 out of the +/- 100 actors and actresses they needed. Imagine starting a project with just 10% of your team! It’s akin to launching a new product with only a fraction of your resources in place. But the team forged ahead, showing resilience from the very start.

Interestingly, the original script of "Pretty Woman" wasn't the romantic comedy we all love today. It was a darker drama titled "$3000," referencing the amount of money Richard Gere's character would pay Julia Roberts' character. The script was filled with grim references to drug use and its consequences, far from the feel-good movie it eventually became. This drastic shift in tone reminds me of how initial project plans can undergo massive transformations, often leading to better outcomes, much like in agile project management where flexibility and iteration can yield surprising results.

Another quirk in the production was the on-the-spot scripting. Many scenes were crafted during filming, a process that could easily derail a project. This improvisational approach is akin to building a plane while flying it. Director Garry Marshall wasn’t even sure of the film’s tone, so he shot each scene three times with different emotional undertones—funny, dark, and random. This gave them flexibility in post-production but also highlighted the uncertainty that permeated the project, similar to how agile methodologies allow for adjustments and pivots based on ongoing feedback.

One of the most iconic scenes in the movie—where Richard Gere and Julia Roberts are at a fine dining restaurant and a snail flies out of her hand—wasn’t scripted. This spontaneous moment became one of the most memorable parts of the film. In project management, this is akin to creating value through unexpected features. Sometimes, the unplanned elements can deliver significant value and delight to the stakeholders, reinforcing the importance of being open to spontaneity and seizing unexpected opportunities.

Despite these haphazard elements, the film's release was a roaring success. With a budget of just $14 million, "Pretty Woman" grossed an astonishing $463 million worldwide. This kind of success in the face of so many hurdles is both inspiring and perplexing. It serves as a reminder that sometimes, the most chaotic and seemingly doomed projects can achieve greatness.

Adding to the list of bizarre anecdotes, Julia Roberts was a relatively unknown actress at the time, and Richard Gere almost didn't take the role. The chemistry they brought to the screen was more serendipitous than planned, yet it became a defining element of the film's success.

In conclusion, "Pretty Woman" exemplifies how adaptability, resilience, and a bit of chaos can lead to unexpected success. It’s a testament to the idea that no matter how troubled a project might seem, there’s always a potential for it to turn out incredibly well. So next time you find yourself in a seemingly doomed project, remember the journey of "Pretty Woman" and take heart—you might just be on the brink of a blockbuster.

Posted on: June 08, 2024 03:25 PM | Permalink | Comments (3)
ADVERTISEMENTS

"I'll do the stupid thing first and then you shy people follow..."

- Frank Zappa

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsors