Project Management

Part 1  -   Challenges, the Laws of Physics, Project/Construction Management and Reality

From the Project Management View from Rail Transit Programs and Projects Blog
by
A collection of articles sharing project processes, design and construction experience, best practices, and lessons learned along with operational knowledge related to executing programs and projects in the rail transit industry.

About this Blog

RSS

Recent Posts

Transitioning Constructed Products from Projects to Owner's Operations

Lessons to be Learned.  What Happens When the Buyer is Not the Owner, Operator and Maintainer of the Company?  

Managing Warranty After Achieving Contract Milestones

What Happens After the Buyer and Seller Agree on a Punchlist?

What is a Punchlist?

Categories

Acceptance, Analytics, ANSI, Asset Management, Best Value, Best Value Contractor Selection, Best Value Selection Criteria, Buyer, Certifications, Commissioning, Communications Management, Construction, Construction Completion, Construction Deliverables, construction manager, Construction Monitoring, Construction Submittals, Consultant, Consultant Contract, Contract Acquisition, Contract Completion, Contract Deliverables, Contract Delivery, Contract Development, Contract Integration, Contract Management, Contract Milestones, Contract Quality, Contract Requirements, Contract Submittals, Contracts, Decision Making, Definitions, Design, Design Bid Build, Design Build, Design Build Delivery, Design Deliverables, Design Services, Design Submittals, Design-Bid-Build, Division 1 Specifications, Document Control, Earned Value Management, Engineering, Estimating, Estimator, Ethics, Factory Acceptance Test, Final Acceptance, Final Completion, General Conditions, General Provisions, General Terms and Conditions, Good Practices, Government, Hard Risks, Hazards, Human Resources, Information For Bidders, Inspection, Inspection and Testing, Inspection Test Plan, Integration, Integration Management, Invitation For Bid, Key Performance Indicators, Knowledge Management, Maintenance, Management Integration, Managerial Time, Managing Change, Managing Changes, Master Project Schedule, Meeting Minutes, Mega Projects, NCR Process, Negotiations, Non Conformance Report, O&M Manuals, Oversight Reports, PM Fundamentals, PMBOK, PMI, PMO, Procurement Management, Professional Obligations, Program Management, program manager, Progress Reports, Project Charter, Project Controls, Project Engineer, Project Engineering, Project Integration, Project Interfacing, Project Management, Project Management Institute, project management office, Project Management Plan, Project Manager, Project Managerr, Project Planning, Project Records, Project Schedules, Project Team, Project Teams, ProjectManagement, Public Relations, punchlist, Quality, Quality, Rail Car Purchase, Rail Transit, Rail Transit Organization, Rail Transit Project, Rail Transit Projects, Railroad, Reliability, Resource Management, RFI Logs, risk, Risk Allocation, risk allocation, Risk Allocations, Risk Management, Risk Management, Safety, Schedule Interfaces, Schedule Management, Schedule Milestones, Scheduler, Scheduling, Scope of Work, Security, Seller, Site Acceptance Test, Soft Risks, Special Inspections, Specifications, Submittal Logs, Submittal Process, Substantial Completion, System Integration, System Integration Test, Systems, Systems Purchase, Testing/Test Management, Threats, Transformation, Transformational Projects, Transportation, Vulnerability, Work Area, Work Areas

Date

linkedin twitter facebook Request to reuse this  


Project/Contract Quality 

The normal practice in projects is all participants are responsible for quality.   But an Owner’s Contracting Office (CO) professes that a contractor is solely responsible for the quality of contracted work.   Consequently, the Construction Management Office (CMO) interprets that the Construction Manager (CM) is not responsible or accountable for contractor quality and workmanship or for quality assurance in the construction management plan.   As a result, the CO’s belief perpetuates the understanding by the CMO and Project Management Office (PMO) that the contractor is solely accountable to comply with the contract and make corrective actions at their own expense.  

A standard Construction Management Plan (CMP) includes a quality assurance plan that establishes the monitoring practices, tools and techniques and the documentation for validating quality is met.   Quality requirements are identified in contracts, project plans and program plans.   And for projects funded by the federal government, there are specific requirements for an independent organizational silo that is responsible for quality control and quality assurance.  

  • Quality control is the process, means and methods, checklists to identify the requirements and to record actual measurements, and to define pass/fail criteria. 
  • Quality assurance is the process of reviewing quality control plans, monitoring quality control processes, monitoring quality control documentation, verifying segregation of rejected deliverables, and validating corrected products meet contract requirements.

With the contractor solely responsible for the quality of its own work, the PMO supports the CMO’s use of a skeleton staff for observing the work and monitoring progress.   As a result, the CM typically splits work assignments between in-office administrative activities and field visits to multiple construction sites.   While on-site, the CM does not allow its staff to directly execute typical responsibilities in the construction industry such as:

  • Review contract drawings and shop drawings with the contractors’ in-progress or completed work
  • Issue Corrective Action Requests (CARs) to address poor quality, incorrect installations or resolving conflicts with space that is allocated for future contract work
  • Issue Field Change Requests (FCRs) to address differing site conditions or coordination of work with predecessor contract work and adjacent contractors.

By the CO’s interpretation, the PMO and CMO are not required to continuously and proactively monitor the contractor’s work and to direct the contractor, which would mitigate the risk that the work is unacceptable or uncorrectable at final inspection.  As a result, the CO is accepting the risks for: 

  • Poor quality of contractor work will be identified by CM and Owner during the final inspection
  • Corrective action on contractor work after final inspection will impact contract schedule and create consequential costs.     

Reality A

According to the Construction Management Association of America (www.CMAAnet.org), construction management professionals provide a vital service on projects:

  • They typically do not perform the actual construction tasks themselves, but act as advisors, charged with assuring the project progresses smoothly and achieves the owner’s business objectives.
  • These specialists oversee different aspects of the project including: scheduling, safety, cost estimating, design, quality assurance, value engineering, commissioning, construction inspection, risk management, and more. Most CMs have backgrounds in civil engineering; many are contractors or architects. 

Reality B

Quality managers are often under-utilized, under-appreciated by project managers, and miss-understood by many others.   But they are a valuable resource for planning preventive actions to avoid quality problems and for corrective actions to resolve quality problems that occur on purchased materials, construction products and system deliverables.   Under these conditions, Quality personnel will take leadership roles to:

  • Enforce contractor compliance with contract requirements and approved quality plans
  • Verify the CM is following an appropriate construction management plan and project quality plan
  • Monitor PMO implementation of a Quality Management System that uses the best industry practices for the domain scope.  

Reality C

At final inspection, early work that is observed and found non-compliant may not be correctible to comply with contract requirements because it is no longer possible or practical due to limited access and the installation of later work.   As a result, corrective action may require a major construction effort that impacts project expenses and schedule or may create major changes in successor contracts to adapt to non-compliant work that is accepted by the CM, CO and Owner as-installed.

Federal government requirements for construction management can be found at https://www.transit.dot.gov/sites/fta.dot.gov/files/docs/FTA_Construction_Project_Management_Handbook_2016.pdf.

 

Role of the Consultant Construction Manager

For all but the simplest project, you will need project staff with expertise and experience in construction management beyond the capability and capacity of the Agency’s regular employees, for which the Agency will need to retain a (CM) consultant. The CM acts as the Agency’s representative with the contractors, oversees what work the contractors perform pursuant to the contract drawings and specifications, inspects the work as acceptable, and recommends payment of contractor invoices. The key CM staff person is the resident engineer (RE), who is principal point of contact with the contractor and is stationed at the site for larger projects, and for smaller projects visits the construction site one or more days a week.


Posted on: July 12, 2018 07:11 PM | Permalink

Comments (7)

Please login or join to subscribe to this item
avatar
Tamer Zeyad Sadiq Assistant Cost Manager| Turner & Townsend Riyadh, Ar Riyad, Saudi Arabia
Great article about contract/quality management!!

avatar
Eduin Fernando Valdes Alvarado Project Manager| F y F Fabricamos Futuro Villavicencio, Meta, Colombia
Very interesting article, thanks

avatar
RAJESH K L Project Manager, PMP| Bharat Electronics, Bengaluru, India Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
Interesting one, thanks for sharing

avatar
Sante Delle-Vergini, PhD Senior Project Manager| Infosys Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Thanks Henry.

avatar
Rami Kaibni
Community Champion
Senior Projects Manager | Field & Marten Associates New Westminster, British Columbia, Canada
Great points Henry

avatar
Elizabeth Harrin Director| RebelsGuideToPM.com London, England, United Kingdom
Interesting to hear your views, thanks!

avatar
Vincent Guerard Coach - Trainer - Speaker - Advisor| Freelance Mont-Royal, Quebec, Canada
Very interesting
When reality B is use, reality C could disappear

Please Login/Register to leave a comment.

ADVERTISEMENTS

"Among those whom I like or admire, I can find no common denominator; but among those whom I love, I can: All of them can make me laugh."

- W.H. Auden

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsors