This blog contains details about various aspects of PMI's Disciplined Agile (DA) tool kit, including new and upcoming topics.
View Posts By:
Tatsiana Balshakova
Mark Lines
Mike Griffiths
James Trott
Bjorn Gustafsson
Curtis Hibbs
Scott Ambler
Past Contributors:
Joshua Barnes
Michael Richardson
Daniel Gagnon
Valentin Tudor Mocanu
Kashmir Birk
Glen Little
Klaus Boedker
Recent Posts
DA 5.6 is released
Disciplined Agile 5.5 Released
Choose Your WoW! Second Edition Is Now Available
Requisite Agility applied in Project Management
Disciplined Agile and PMBoK Guide 7th Edition
Categories
#ChoiceIsGood,
#ChooseYourWoW,
#ConsumableSolution,
#ContinuousImprovement,
#CoreAgilePractices,
#experiment,
#Experimentation,
#GuidedContinuousImprovement,
#Kaizen,
#LifeCycles,
#ProcessImprovement,
#TealOrganizations,
Adoption,
agile,
agile adoption,
Agile Alliance,
Agile Business Analyst,
Agile certification,
agile data,
agile governance,
agile lifecycle,
agile metrics,
agile principles,
agile transformation,
Agile2018,
Agile2019,
Agile20Reflect,
AgileData,
Analogy,
announcement,
Architecture,
architecture,
architecture owner,
Articles and publications,
Asset Management,
Atari,
Backlog,
Barclays,
being agile,
benefits,
bi,
blades,
book,
Branching strategies,
Browser,
Business Agility,
business intelligence,
business operations,
capex,
Case Study,
Certification,
certification,
charity,
Choose your WoW,
CMMI,
cmmi,
Coaching,
Collaboration,
Communications Management,
Compliance,
Compliancy,
Conference,
Construction,
Construction phase,
Context,
Continuous Improvement,
coordination,
COVID-19,
Culture,
culture,
Cutter,
DA,
DAD,
DAD Book,
DAD discussions,
DAD press,
DAD roles,
DAD supporters,
DAD webcast,
DADay2019,
Data Management,
database,
dependencies,
Deployment,
Development Strategies,
DevOps,
disaster,
Discipline,
discipline,
Disciplined Agile,
disciplined agile delivery,
disciplined agile delivery blog,
Disciplined Agile Enterprise,
disciplined devops,
Documentation,
Domain complexity,
dw,
DW/BI,
Energy Healing,
Enterprise Agile,
Enterprise Architecture,
Enterprise Awareness,
enterprise awareness,
Essence,
estimation,
Evolving DA,
Executive,
Experiment,
facilitation,
FailureBow,
feedback-cycle,
finance,
Financial,
FLEX,
Flow,
foundation layer,
Funding,
GCI,
GDD,
Geographic Distribution,
gladwell,
global development,
Goal-Driven,
goal-driven,
goals,
Governance,
GQM,
Guideline,
Hybrid,
Improvement,
inception,
Inception phase,
India,
information technology,
infosec,
Introduction,
iterations,
Kanban,
large teams,
layer,
lean,
Lean Startup,
learning,
Legal Project Management,
LeSS,
Lifecycle,
lifecycle,
Manifesto,
mark lines,
marketing,
MBI,
Metaphor,
Metrics,
metrics,
mindset,
Miscellaneous,
MVP,
News,
News and events,
Non-Functional Requirements,
non-functional requirements,
Non-solo development,
offshoring,
Operations,
opex,
Organization,
Outsourcing,
outsourcing,
paired programming,
pairing,
paper,
People,
People Management,
phases,
Philosophies,
Planning,
PMBoK,
PMI,
PMI and DA,
PMI Chapter,
Portfolio Management,
post-format-quote,
Practices,
practices,
Principle,
Process,
process improvement,
process tailoring,
Product Management,
product owner,
Product Owners,
productivity,
Program Management,
Project Management,
project-initiation,
Promise,
Quality,
quality,
rational unified process,
Refactoring,
Reiki,
Release Management,
release management,
Remote Training,
Remote Work,
repeatability,
requirements,
Requirements Management,
research&development,
responsibilities,
retrospectives,
Reuse,
Reuse Engineering,
ride for heart,
rights,
Risk Management,
Risk Management,
Risk management,
Roles,
RUP,
SAFe,
sales,
Scaling,
scaling,
scaling agile,
Scheduled Workshops,
SCM,
scorecard,
Scrum,
ScrumMaster,
SDLC,
Security,
security,
self-organization,
SEMAT,
serial,
skill,
solutions software consumable shippable,
Stakeholder Management,
strategy,
Support,
Surveys,
Teal organizations,
team development,
Team Lead,
team lead,
Teams,
Technical Debt,
Teleconferencing,
Terminology,
terraforming,
test strategy,
testing,
time tracking,
Tool kit,
Toolkit,
tools,
traditional,
Transformation,
Transition iteration,
transition phase,
Uncategorized,
Upmentors,
Using PMI Standards,
value stream,
velocity,
vendor management,
Virtual Training,
Workflow,
workflow,
workspaces
Date
We are often told that agile teams should be whole, that they should have sufficient people, funding, and skills to fulfill their mission. The idea is that this reduces the dependencies that your team has on others, enabling them to make decisions and to collaborate more effectively. But, is this actually happening in practice? Are agile teams truly whole, or do they still need to collaborate with other teams (hopefully productively) to get the job done? Being strong believers in empiricism over rhetoric we decided to look into this issue.
In November of 2016 we ran the 2016 Agility at Scale survey. It was targeted at people who were currently working on agile teams, or who had recently worked on agile teams, and we asked them straightforward questions around the size of the team, how distributed it was, what complexities they faced, an so on. The following infographic summarizes the findings from the question that explored whether agile delivery teams need to work with external teams or groups to get their work done – in other words, are agile teams truly whole or do they rely on others? As you can see, 96% of respondents indicated that in practice their team had to work with one or more other teams, leading to the conclusion that very few agile teams appear to be truly whole.
One of the fundamental principles underlying the Disciplined Agile (DA) toolkit is that disciplined agilists should be enterprise aware – they should recognize that they need to collaborate with others outside of their team, that they should work towards a common organizational vision, and that they should strive to do what is best for the organization and not just what is convenient for them. Given that agile teams are collaborating with others in practice, it is clear that this philosophy of being enterprise aware is important.
The following diagram presents the results from the survey question in greater detail. You can obtain the source data, a copy of the original questions, and a slide deck key diagrams at the 2016 Agility at Scale survey page.
Related Posts:
Posted
by
Scott Ambler
on: February 09, 2017 12:37 PM |
Permalink
