Stakeholder management. Emotional Intelligence & Knowledge matrix
From the Random Thoughts Blog
by Eduard Hernandez
Uniting the passion for writing and project management
Recent Posts
Autonomous vehicles: when 90% done means nowhere near ready
The accidental path to Project Management
What history reveals about AI and the Project Manager profession
When results aren’t enough: Rethinking Leadership
The Sagrada Família: A living Project Management case study
Categories
74-343,
Agile,
Agile,
Artificial Intelligence,
basadur,
Budget Management,
Career Development,
Certification,
Change Management,
Change; Change management; Team management,
Chapter,
Communications Management,
Complexity,
conceptualizer,
Cost Management,
data management,
Decision Making,
Estimating,
Ethics,
generator,
Giga Projects,
Goal Setting,
Governance,
Human touch,
implementer,
Leadership,
Lessons Learned,
machine learning,
MS Project 2013,
Negotation,
New Practitioners,
optimizer,
Organizational behavior,
Organizational Culture,
personal growth,
pharmaceutical; lifecyle management; agile; waterfall,
PMI,
Problem solving,
Product Owner,
Project Communication,
Project Management,
PSM I,
PSPO,
Resource Management,
Risk Management,
Scheduling,
Scope Management,
Scrum,
self-development,
Stakeholder management,
Strategy,
Teams,
test,
training,
Volunteering
Date
The Power & Interest grid (P&I) is a simple and effective stakeholder analysis tool that categorizes stakeholders according to their degree of interest and power in the project. The end goal of such a tool is to identify key stakeholders who can make or break the project.
Power and interest are project specific variables. A stakeholder with a high interest and little power in project A can score totally opposite in project B. Typically, one of these four approaches is applied depending on the score: monitor, keep informed, keep satisfied, manage closely. Despite the usefulness of this tool, could stakeholders be mapped out according to project independent variables? At the end of the day, it is frequent to simplify things and define coworkers in two dimensions: emotional intelligence, EI - are they in control of their emotions and show empathy to others? - and knowledge – how much do they really know? A matrix that plots these two variables is useful in putting together a balanced team and opens up the possibility of identifying synergistic effects amongst stakeholders.

Group 1: High EI & High Knowledge
These individuals are likely to be the best fitted in leading (sub)teams. In addition, their wealth of knowledge combined with outstanding EI skills makes them the best candidates to mentor junior or less experienced members, especially from groups 2 and 4. They require minimal supervision and make working with them a rewarding experience. Most likely, they will be on the wish list of future projects or endeavors.
Group 2: High EI & Low Knowledge
Stakeholders in this group have the right mindset to allow further personal growth and development. Their lack of knowledge is compensated by their continuous commitment to hard work. Opportunities to expand their knowledge must be considered to keep them motivated; this could be done by an ad-hoc training program including shadowing a knowledgeable stakeholder from groups 1 or 3.
Group 3. Low EI & High Knowledge
The wealth of knowledge that these stakeholders bring to the table is well needed. However, stakeholders that fall in this category tend to make noise, bypass communication lines and could eventually become a threat to project’s well-being. Assigning them an SME role, as opposed to a leading part, should cover their feeling of importance (it is assumed that every stakeholder wants to feel that what they do matters) and thereby minimize the occurrence of disruptive situations along the way.
Group 4: Low EI & Low Knowledge
Also known as rotten apples. The value added is small compared with the amount of supervision they require. Chances of project derailing skyrocket if too many of these are in the same team. A balanced training comprising soft and hard skills together with the inclusion in a mentoring program are initiatives to consider in order to slowly but surely turn this bad apple into a tasty and juicy one. In some cases, the metamorphose occurs only in one dimension, EI or knowledge, shifting to Groups 2 or 3 respectively.
Posted on: May 04, 2020 08:39 AM |
Permalink
Comments (10)
Please login or join to subscribe to this item
Drew Craig
Sr. Agile & Product Coach| Vanguard
Philadelphia, Pa, United States
Thanks, Eduard.
Always opportunistic to simplify and visualize important information. When the audience is better able to consume and digest information, they are better equipped to ascertain and make informed [and impactful] decisions. I have found any time we can visualize in a nice format, it enables conversations and others to objectively perceive and make use of the data/information represented.
Eduard Hernandez
Community Champion
Product Operations Program Manager
Barcelona, Cataluña, Spain
Thanks for your comment, Andrew. I am also a big supporter of visual thinking and mapping things out! Best regards. Eduard
Alexandre Costa
Scrum Master| Integer Consulting - Pictet technologies
Loures, Portugal
Eduard,
I appreciate your post , but the measure of either intelligence are not simple as might see at first sight. There are still many gaps in EI.
http://www.eiconsortium.org/reprints/ei_is...rstandings.html
Alexandre Costa
Eduard Hernandez
Community Champion
Product Operations Program Manager
Barcelona, Cataluña, Spain
Dear Alexandre,
I was unable to access the url.
I tiik the following definition of EI "The ability to understand and manage your own emotions, and those of the people around you. People with a high degree of emotional intelligence know what they're feeling, what their emotions mean, and how these emotions can affect other people."
Best regards,
Eduard
Amaechi Okoh
Project Manager| Dukalix Limited
Asaba, Nigeria
Thanks for sharing. Your post gave more insight to the traditional project stakeholder management approaches.
Eduard Hernandez
Community Champion
Product Operations Program Manager
Barcelona, Cataluña, Spain
Glad that you liked the post, Amaechi. Thanks for taking the time to comment.
Marcus Udokang
Project Manager| Aivaz Consulting
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Eduard, I like this article. The idea of controlling one's emotions and showing empathy toward stakeholders, team members, and co-workers is very important. It can obviously help with the synergistic effects of balancing a team. Minimizing the bad apple effect is always good, too.
It's interesting how for some in Group 4, the Low EI & Low Knowledge quadrant, may only have a one dimensional growth avenue to either a higher level of EI (Group 2) or higher knowledge (Group 3). I'd be curious to know why this happens.
Stephen Robin
Project Analyst Trainee| Ministry of Works and Transport
Arima, Ari, Trinidad and Tobago
Innovative idea Eduard. Emotional intelligence in a categorized and documented format is a viable tool. Especially in medium and large-scale projects. I like it a lot.
I would say I fall in group 2. Other than an ad hoc training program. What are the ways to fall under group 1 in the shortest period of time?
Mustafa Hafizoglu
Program Director| SDT Space And Defence Technologies
Ankara, Türkiye
Most practitioners have difficulty in how to utilize from EI although they know it is important. This article is inspiring, thanks.
Please Login/Register to leave a comment.
|
"Humanity has advanced, when it has advanced, not because it has been sober, responsible and cautious, but because it has been playful, rebellious and immature."
- Tom Robbins
|