Project Management

Stakeholder management. Emotional Intelligence & Knowledge matrix

From the Random Thoughts Blog
by
Uniting the passion for writing and project management

About this Blog

RSS

Recent Posts

Autonomous vehicles: when 90% done means nowhere near ready

The accidental path to Project Management

What history reveals about AI and the Project Manager profession

When results aren’t enough: Rethinking Leadership

The Sagrada Família: A living Project Management case study

Categories

74-343, Agile, Agile, Artificial Intelligence, basadur, Budget Management, Career Development, Certification, Change Management, Change; Change management; Team management, Chapter, Communications Management, Complexity, conceptualizer, Cost Management, data management, Decision Making, Estimating, Ethics, generator, Giga Projects, Goal Setting, Governance, Human touch, implementer, Leadership, Lessons Learned, machine learning, MS Project 2013, Negotation, New Practitioners, optimizer, Organizational behavior, Organizational Culture, personal growth, pharmaceutical; lifecyle management; agile; waterfall, PMI, Problem solving, Product Owner, Project Communication, Project Management, PSM I, PSPO, Resource Management, Risk Management, Scheduling, Scope Management, Scrum, self-development, Stakeholder management, Strategy, Teams, test, training, Volunteering

Date

linkedin twitter facebook Request to reuse this  


The Power & Interest grid (P&I) is a simple and effective stakeholder analysis tool that categorizes stakeholders according to their degree of interest and power in the project. The end goal of such a tool is to identify key stakeholders who can make or break the project.

Power and interest are project specific variables. A stakeholder with a high interest and little power in project A can score totally opposite in project B. Typically, one of these four approaches is applied depending on the score: monitor, keep informed, keep satisfied, manage closely. Despite the usefulness of this tool, could stakeholders be mapped out according to project independent variables? At the end of the day, it is frequent to simplify things and define coworkers in two dimensions: emotional intelligence, EI - are they in control of their emotions and show empathy to others? - and knowledge – how much do they really know? A matrix that plots these two variables is useful in putting together a balanced team and opens up the possibility of identifying synergistic effects amongst stakeholders.

 

 

 

 

 

Group 1: High EI & High Knowledge

These individuals are likely to be the best fitted in leading (sub)teams. In addition, their wealth of knowledge combined with outstanding EI skills makes them the best candidates to mentor junior or less experienced members, especially from groups 2 and 4. They require minimal supervision and make working with them a rewarding experience. Most likely, they will be on the wish list of future projects or endeavors.

Group 2: High EI & Low Knowledge

Stakeholders in this group have the right mindset to allow further personal growth and development. Their lack of knowledge is compensated by their continuous commitment to hard work. Opportunities to expand their knowledge must be considered to keep them motivated; this could be done by an ad-hoc training program including shadowing a knowledgeable stakeholder from groups 1 or 3.

Group 3. Low EI & High Knowledge

The wealth of knowledge that these stakeholders bring to the table is well needed. However, stakeholders that fall in this category tend to make noise, bypass communication lines and could eventually become a threat to project’s well-being. Assigning them an SME role, as opposed to a leading part, should cover their feeling of importance (it is assumed that every stakeholder wants to feel that what they do matters) and thereby minimize the occurrence of disruptive situations along the way.

Group 4: Low EI & Low Knowledge

Also known as rotten apples. The value added is small compared with the amount of supervision they require. Chances of project derailing skyrocket if too many of these are in the same team. A balanced training comprising soft and hard skills together with the inclusion in a mentoring program are initiatives to consider in order to slowly but surely turn this bad apple into a tasty and juicy one. In some cases, the metamorphose occurs only in one dimension, EI or knowledge, shifting to Groups 2 or 3 respectively.


Posted on: May 04, 2020 08:39 AM | Permalink

Comments (10)

Please login or join to subscribe to this item
avatar
Drew Craig Sr. Agile & Product Coach| Vanguard Philadelphia, Pa, United States
Thanks, Eduard.
Always opportunistic to simplify and visualize important information. When the audience is better able to consume and digest information, they are better equipped to ascertain and make informed [and impactful] decisions. I have found any time we can visualize in a nice format, it enables conversations and others to objectively perceive and make use of the data/information represented.

avatar
Eduin Fernando Valdes Alvarado Project Manager| F y F Fabricamos Futuro Villavicencio, Meta, Colombia
Thanks for sharing

avatar
Eduard Hernandez
Community Champion
Product Operations Program Manager Barcelona, Cataluña, Spain
Thanks for your comment, Andrew. I am also a big supporter of visual thinking and mapping things out! Best regards. Eduard

avatar
Alexandre Costa Scrum Master| Integer Consulting - Pictet technologies Loures, Portugal
Eduard,

I appreciate your post , but the measure of either intelligence are not simple as might see at first sight. There are still many gaps in EI.

http://www.eiconsortium.org/reprints/ei_is...rstandings.html

Alexandre Costa

avatar
Eduard Hernandez
Community Champion
Product Operations Program Manager Barcelona, Cataluña, Spain
Dear Alexandre,

I was unable to access the url.

I tiik the following definition of EI "The ability to understand and manage your own emotions, and those of the people around you. People with a high degree of emotional intelligence know what they're feeling, what their emotions mean, and how these emotions can affect other people."

Best regards,

Eduard

avatar
Amaechi Okoh Project Manager| Dukalix Limited Asaba, Nigeria
Thanks for sharing. Your post gave more insight to the traditional project stakeholder management approaches.

avatar
Eduard Hernandez
Community Champion
Product Operations Program Manager Barcelona, Cataluña, Spain
Glad that you liked the post, Amaechi. Thanks for taking the time to comment.

avatar
Marcus Udokang Project Manager| Aivaz Consulting Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Eduard, I like this article. The idea of controlling one's emotions and showing empathy toward stakeholders, team members, and co-workers is very important. It can obviously help with the synergistic effects of balancing a team. Minimizing the bad apple effect is always good, too.

It's interesting how for some in Group 4, the Low EI & Low Knowledge quadrant, may only have a one dimensional growth avenue to either a higher level of EI (Group 2) or higher knowledge (Group 3). I'd be curious to know why this happens.

avatar
Stephen Robin Project Analyst Trainee| Ministry of Works and Transport Arima, Ari, Trinidad and Tobago
Innovative idea Eduard. Emotional intelligence in a categorized and documented format is a viable tool. Especially in medium and large-scale projects. I like it a lot.

I would say I fall in group 2. Other than an ad hoc training program. What are the ways to fall under group 1 in the shortest period of time?

avatar
Mustafa Hafizoglu Program Director| SDT Space And Defence Technologies Ankara, Türkiye
Most practitioners have difficulty in how to utilize from EI although they know it is important. This article is inspiring, thanks.

Please Login/Register to leave a comment.

ADVERTISEMENTS

"Humanity has advanced, when it has advanced, not because it has been sober, responsible and cautious, but because it has been playful, rebellious and immature."

- Tom Robbins

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsors