Project Management

The pitfalls of group decision-making: lessons from Jared Diamond’s Collapse

From the Random Thoughts Blog
by
Uniting the passion for writing and project management

About this Blog

RSS

Recent Posts

Autonomous vehicles: when 90% done means nowhere near ready

The accidental path to Project Management

What history reveals about AI and the Project Manager profession

When results aren’t enough: Rethinking Leadership

The Sagrada Família: A living Project Management case study

Categories

74-343, Agile, Agile, Artificial Intelligence, basadur, Budget Management, Career Development, Certification, Change Management, Change; Change management; Team management, Chapter, Communications Management, Complexity, conceptualizer, Cost Management, data management, Decision Making, Estimating, Ethics, generator, Giga Projects, Goal Setting, Governance, Human touch, implementer, Leadership, Lessons Learned, machine learning, MS Project 2013, Negotation, New Practitioners, optimizer, Organizational behavior, Organizational Culture, personal growth, pharmaceutical; lifecyle management; agile; waterfall, PMI, Problem solving, Product Owner, Project Communication, Project Management, PSM I, PSPO, Resource Management, Risk Management, Scheduling, Scope Management, Scrum, self-development, Stakeholder management, Strategy, Teams, test, training, Volunteering

Date

linkedin twitter facebook Request to reuse this  


Ah, the thrill of decision-making in project management! The excitement, the brainstorming sessions, the camaraderie—and occasionally, the spectacular failures. As I recently delved into Jared Diamond’s Collapse, I was struck by his masterful analysis of how groups stumble into failure. In Chapter 14, Diamond outlines four categories of decision-making pitfalls that resonate deeply with our modern project challenges.

Let’s take a tour through these categories, illustrated by historical examples from his book and mirrored by some contemporary project misadventures.

1. Failing to anticipate a problem

In Collapse, Diamond discusses how the Norse in Greenland failed to anticipate the Little Ice Age. They stuck to their European farming methods despite the changing climate, which ultimately led to their downfall. Fast forward to our era, and think of the blockbuster flop that was Google Glass. The product team, dazzled by the tech’s potential, didn’t anticipate consumer privacy concerns and the social stigma of being a “Glasshole.” Just like the Norse, they stuck to their vision, blind to the gathering storm.

2. Failing to perceive a problem

Diamond points out the classic case of the Easter Island civilization, which didn’t perceive the long-term consequences of deforestation. They chopped down every tree, oblivious to the environmental collapse it would trigger. A modern echo of this is the infamous Boeing 737 Max debacle. Despite internal warnings and obvious design flaws, Boeing failed to perceive—or at least acknowledge—the gravity of the problem until it was too late, resulting in tragic crashes and a costly grounding of the fleet.

3. Failing to try to solve the problem

The classic Maya civilization, another of Diamond's examples, saw environmental degradation and political strife but failed to address these issues effectively. Contemporary parallel? Think of Blockbuster. They saw the rise of digital streaming but chose to ignore it, clinging to their brick-and-mortar model until Netflix and other streaming services had eaten their lunch. It wasn’t that they didn’t perceive the problem; they simply didn’t try to adapt in time.

4. Failing to solve the problem successfully

Lastly, Diamond discusses the example of the Soviet irrigation projects in Central Asia that led to the Aral Sea disaster. They recognized the problem and tried to address water scarcity, but their solutions were catastrophic, turning the sea into a toxic desert. A modern-day counterpart would be the development of the F-35 fighter jet. Despite massive investment and numerous attempts to address its issues, the project has been plagued by cost overruns and technical failures, making it one of the most controversial military projects today.

In conclusion, decision-making is as much about avoiding pitfalls as it is about seizing opportunities. By reflecting on historical and contemporary examples of failed group decisions, we can learn to navigate the complexities of our own projects with a bit more savvy—and perhaps a dash of humility. So, the next time you’re in a meeting and someone says, “What could possibly go wrong?” just remember: quite a lot, actually.


Posted on: July 15, 2024 04:03 PM | Permalink

Comments (6)

Please login or join to subscribe to this item
avatar
Vinod Garg CEO| PROMAC ADVISORS PRIVATE LIMITED Jaipur, Rajasthan, India
Nice article

avatar
Arun Sharma Delhi, DL, India
Nicely explained topic, thanks for sharing

Great post and comprehensive breakdown.

avatar
Binay Samanta Director| Project & Environment Consultants Dhanbad, India
We can learn to navigate the complexities of our own projects with a bit more savvy—what could possibly go wrong.

avatar
Eduard Hernandez
Community Champion
Product Operations Program Manager Barcelona, Cataluña, Spain
Thanks for taking the time to read the blog and adding your comments. Greatly appreciated!

avatar
Nigel Tan Project Manager & Lead Consultant| Malaysian SOCIAL Project Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Such an interesting read. Appreciate this!

Please Login/Register to leave a comment.

ADVERTISEMENTS

"One of the symptoms of an approaching nervous breakdown is the belief that one's work is terribly important. "

- Bertrand Russell

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsors