Why Program Management?
From the PMI Global Insights Blog
by Cameron McGaughy,
James Turchick
Whether it’s in-person or virtual, PMI events give you the right skills to complete amazing projects. In this blog, whether it be our Virtual Experience Series, PMI Training (formerly Seminars World) or PMI® Global Summit, experienced event presenters past, present and future from the entire PMI event family share their knowledge on a wide range of issues important to project managers.
View Posts By:
Cameron McGaughy
James Turchick
Past Contributors:
Kimberly Whitby
Johanna Rusly
April Birchmeier
Nikki Evans
Dalibor Ninkovic
Dr. Deepa Bhide
Morten Sorensen
Tao Chun Liu
Jonathan Spiteri
Chris DiBella
Nic Jain
Tyler Norman
Nicholas Sonnenberg
Tam Abaku
Klaus Nielsen, MBA, PMI-ACP, PMP
Karen Chovan
Jack Duggal
Catalin Dogaru
Priya Patra
Josh Parrott
Scott Lesnick-CSP
Antonio Nieto
Dimitrios Zaires
Ahmed Zouhair
Carmine Paragano
Te Wu
Scott Bain
Katie Mcconochie
Fabiola Maisonnier
Erik Agudelo
Paul A Capello
Kiron Bondale
Jamie Champagne
Esra Tepeli
Renaldi Gondosubroto
Joseph Musiitwa
Mel Ross
Laura Lazzerini
Yonela Mfeya
Kim Essendrup
Geetha Gopal
David Summers
Carol Martinez
Lisa DiTullio
Tai Cochran
Fabio Rigamonti
Archana Shetty
Geneviève Bouchard
Teresa Lawrence, PhD, PMP, CSM
Randall Englund
Kristy Tan Neckowicz
Moritz Sprenger
Mike Frenette
O. Chima Okereke
David Maynard
Nancie Celini
Brantlee Underhill
Claudia Alcelay
Sandra MacGillivray
Vibha Tripathi
Sharmila Das
Michelle Brown
Gina Abudi
Greg Githens
Joy Beatty
Sarah Mersereau
Lawrence Cooper
Donna Gregorio
Seth Greenwald
Bruce Gay
Michele Mattera
Wael Ramadan
Fiona Lin
Somnath Ghosh
Yasmina Khelifi
Erik Rueter
Joe Shi
Michel Thiry
Erika Kiely
Heather van Wyk
Jennifer Donahue
Barbara Trautlein
Julie Ho
Steve Salisbury
Jill Diffendal
Yves Cavarec
Rose James
Drew Craig
Vinay Babu Tarala
Stephanie Jaeger
Diana Robertson
Zahid Khan
Benjamin C. Anyacho
Nadia Vincent
Carlos Javier Pampliega García
Norma Lynch
Heather McLarnon, CSPO
Lissette Indhira Pimentel Sosa
Emily Luijbregts
Susan Coleman
Aneliya Chervenova
Michelle Stronach
Sydni Neptune
Louise Fournier
Quincy Wright
Peace Opuruiche Echeonwu
Nesrin Christine Aykac
Ming Yeung
Laura Samsó
Lily Woi
Jill Almaguer
Mayte Mata Sivera
Prof. Éamonn Kelly
Marcos Arias
Karthik Ramamurthy
Michelle Venezia
Yoram Solomon
Cheryl Lee
Kelly George
Dan Furlong
Kristin Jones
Jeannette Cabanis-Brewin
Olivia Montgomery
Carlene Szostak
Hilary Kinney
Annmarie Curley
Dave Davis
Recent Posts
Presentation Recap: Sustainability in Project Management
Presentation Recap: Measuring and Managing Enterprise Portfolio Health
Elevating Leadership Through Community: Reflections from the PMI Global Summit 2025
Why the PMI Global Summit Series Africa Is a Classroom of Urgency
Presentation Recap: Women in Project Management - Breaking the Glass Ceiling
Categories
Agile,
Agility,
alignment,
Ask the Expert,
Benefits Realization,
Best Practices,
Bonding,
Business Analysis,
Calculating Project Value,
Capital Projects,
Career Development,
Change Management,
Cloud Computing,
Collaboration,
collaboration,
Communications Management,
Complexity,
Congress 2016 Ask an Expert,
Construction,
Curiosity,
Digital Transformation,
digital transformation,
Documentation,
Earned Value Management,
Education,
EMEA,
EMEA Congress Reflections,
Engagement,
engagement,
Ethics,
Events,
Extra Info,
Facilitation,
forecasting,
future,
Generational PM,
Global Congress 2016,
Global Congress 2016 - North America,
Global Summit,
Global Summit 2023,
Global Summit Series,
Good News,
Government,
Healthcare,
Human Aspects of PM,
Human Resources,
Identity,
Information Technology,
Innovation,
Kickoff,
Leadership,
Lessons Learned,
Mentoring,
Metrics,
Networking,
New Practitioners,
Nontraditional Project Management,
organisations,
Organizational Risk,
PM & the Economy,
PM Think About It,
PMI,
PMI Congress,
PMI Congress NA 2016,
PMI EMEA Congress 2018,
PMI Global Conference,
PMI Global Conference 2017,
PMI Global Conference 2019,
PMI Global Congress - 2016,
PMI Global Congress 2012 - North America,
PMI Global Congress 2013 - EMEA,
PMI Global Congress 2014 - North America,
Pmi global congress 2014 - North America,
PMI Global Congress 2015,
PMI Global Congress 2015 - Ask the Expert,
PMI Global Congress 2016 - EMEA,
PMI Hours for Impact,
PMI PMO Symposium 2013,
PMI Pulse of the Profession,
PMI Training,
PMI Virtual Experience Series,
PMIEMEA17,
PMIEMEA19,
PMO,
PMO,
PMXPO,
Portfolio Management,
Procurement Management,
Professional Development,
Program Management,
Project Delivery,
Project Failure,
project kickoff,
Project Planning,
Project Requirements,
Reflections on the PM Life,
Risk Management,
Risk Management,
ROI,
Roundtable,
Scheduling,
SeminarsWorld,
Social Impact,
Social Responsibility,
SoftSkills,
Stakeholder Management,
Strategy,
Sustainability,
Teams,
Techniques,
test,
The Moon,
Tools,
Training,
Translations,
Videos,
Virtual Experience Series,
Virtual Teams,
Volunteering,
war
Date
When I saw PMI’s call for papers for their 2014 North American Congress, I debated which topics I would propose to write and speak about. Over the last 10 years, I have presented at various PMI Congresses on topics of Project Management Maturity, Scheduling, Project Portfolio Management, Earned Value Analysis, Setting and Achieving Stretch Goals, and Effective Communication and Collaboration Skills. It is clearly time for something different, I thought, something on Program Management perhaps. It is one of those topics that doesn’t get enough attention. Most people assume you would just do the same thing as you would for Project Management, only that you would do it to a group of related projects. Well, in my opinion that’s both correct and incorrect. So it’s decided then. I will speak about Program Management at this year’s PMI North American Congress.
When I’m in the planning phase for a Program, the processes I use for Program Management match those of Project Management exactly. I gather requirements for the complete scope, make sure the requirements are clear and can be met. I use the same decomposition technique to break down the scope to a manageable level which I can then assign to project managers. Call it what you want, but my Enterprise Project Structure or Program Breakdown Structure look very much like a project Work Breakdown Structure. I even use the same tools and techniques for analogous estimating, evaluating trade-offs (build, buy or partner) and planning procurement and HR activities. Along the way, I carefully manage stakeholder expectations, taking the “cautiously optimistic” approach. I personally like to under-promise and over-deliver – but that is difficult to do because sponsors have a way of making me say “yes” to their laundry list of wishes. Even so, I have been called a “Spoiler” by my executive sponsor on many occasions. So at least for me, planning a program is very much the same process as planning a project, only I stop at a higher level of detail and let the assigned project managers take over from there.
Once the Program Plan is approved and projects can begin, the Program’s execution, monitoring and control phases are also similar to those in Project Management. The key difference, is the effective summarization of the relevant project details so that I can “see the forest for the trees.” I need to know the program progress at a high level, while making sure important events and trends are not missed (or worse, hidden!) As a program manager, I also need to play match-maker between project managers, and reminding them how each project is dependent or impacting another project in the program. I find that project managers can become myopic (probably for their own sanity and self-preservation!) about their own projects and they often forget (or avoid) to inform the related projects which they impact. Information about project progress needs to flow up and down at the appropriate level of detail so program decisions can be made effectively and in a timely manner. When done well, it’s why Program Managers deserve to “make the big bucks.”
In my presentation at Congress, I will share some real examples to show how Program Management is different and challenging at the same time. If you are managing programs or large projects that contain many sub-projects, I hope you will attend and share your experience with all of us. Until then, be well.
Posted
by
Kristy Tan Neckowicz
on: September 01, 2014 08:24 PM |
Permalink
Comments (4)
Please login or join to subscribe to this item
Dan Furlong
Managing Director & CEO| NexusBio Partners
Charleston, Sc, United States
Kristy, I am looking forward to your presentation at Congress.
One of the challenges I have seen with program management is that the program manager often deems it necessary to get involved in the weeds of each project. I guess that is analogous to the project manager who feels it is necessary to know EVERY detail of the project, these program managers often get in the way of the project managers who are trying to deliver on their individual (but related) project deliverables to make the program be successful.
The other common problem I have seen is almost the inverse of the first, where the project managers WANT the program manager be involved in everything, or at least know the details of everything going on within each project. Sometimes the project managers feel the program manager is incompetent because he/she can''''t get into the weeds at the level the project managers or staff can.
I believe it is the project manager''''s job to run his project, and the program manager''''s job to coordinate the projects -- and based on your comment about the forest and trees I believe you agree.
If the program manager knew the details of each project we would not need project managers (much like if the project manager has to know all of the details of each of their staff members work we would not need the staff).
So, will you talk about ways to set this expectation of the program and project managers? I don''''t mean through a RAM or similar structure, but more from a perception and expectations standpoint.
Dan, I totally agree with you that it is the project manager's job to manage the project, and the program manager's job to coordinate among all projects at a higher level. The "common problem" you described is truly one of my pet peeves (and I that I try to remind myself often, in my own role as a senior manager). Assuming the organization is large enough so that people are not required to wear multiple hats all the time, the program manager must let project managers do their jobs and not get into the weeds with them or for them. I am all about giving program managers the right level of information so they can make better decisions that impact projects. That way, program managers do not feel the need to know every detail about the projects, and project managers do not feel the need to share every detail. This is actually a lessons learned from the case study I will share during the presentation. Looking forward to meeting you at the Congress!
Program management is necessary in order to achieve certain advantages which can be realized when project are handled in interrelated manner as the performance and input information are dependent among the projects
Further when there is ambiguity, it is even more essential to handle the related projects as program and pursue a direction which is optimum for all projects.
It also enlightens project manager, who is more worried about his project and either not aware or ignores how dependent is the business value and organization strategy upon the integrated management of project at program level
Patti Gilchrist
Product Manager| UnitedHealth Group
Bluffton, Sc, United States
I look forward to your presentation. I won't be able to attend. Will it be available afterward for viewing? Thanks!
Please Login/Register to leave a comment.
|
"Forgive your enemies, but never forget their names."
- John F. Kennedy
|