Project Management

What Does Quality Cost?

From the The Money Files Blog
by
A blog that looks at all aspects of project and program finances from budgets, estimating and accounting to getting a pay rise and managing contracts. Written by Elizabeth Harrin from RebelsGuideToPM.com.

About this Blog

RSS

Recent Posts

How to learn AI the sensible way

Making sense of project cost reports

How real PM mentoring actually works

The Accidental Product Manager: What project managers need to know

How healthy are your project finances?

Categories

accounting, agile, ai, appraisals, Artificial Intelligence, audit, Backlog, Benchmarking, benefits, Benefits Management, Benefits Realization, Bias, books, budget, Business Case, business case, business case, Career Development, Career Development, carnival, case study, Change Management, checklist, collaboration tools, communication, Communications Management, competition, complex projects, Conferences, config management, consultancy, contingency, contracts, corporate finance, corporate finance, cost, Cost Management, cost management, credit crunch, CRM, data, data security, debate, Decision Making, delegating, digite, earned value, Education, Energy and Utilities, Estimating, events, FAQ, financial management, financial management, forecasting, future, GDPR, general, Goals, Governance, green, Information Technology, Innovation, insurance, interviews, it, Knowledge Management, Leadership, Lessons Learned, measuring performance, Mentoring, merger, methods, metrics, multiple projects, negotiating, Networking, news, Olympics, organization, Organizational Culture, outsourcing, personal finance, Planning, pmi, PMO, PMO, Portfolio Management, portfolio management, presentations, privacy policy, process, procurement, product management, productivity, Program Management, project closure, project data, project delivery, Project Success, project testing, prototyping, qualifications, Quality, quality, Quarterly Review, records, recruitment, reports, requirements, research, resilience, Resource Management, resources, risk, Risk Management, ROI, salaries, Schedule Management, Scheduling, scope, Scope Management, security, small projects, Social Impact, social impact, social media, software, software, software, Stakeholder Management, stakeholders, Strategy, success factors, supplier management, team, Teams, testing, testing, timesheets, tips, training, transparency, trends, value management, vendors, video, virtual teams, workflow

Date

linkedin twitter facebook Request to reuse this  


Cost of Quality

Recently there has been a discussion about which areas of the PMBOK® Guide are hardest to learn. Quality came up a few times: in my view that’s because the quality management techniques are not often put into practice.

On a training course I did recently, one of the delegates from a construction background felt that it was all second-nature, but others in the group had very little experience of quality techniques because the industries they worked in didn’t require the same focus on a quality outcome. It’s not that they didn’t care about quality, it’s just that it manifested itself in a different way in their jobs and they took a different approach to getting there.

So today I’m going to talk about one of the aspects of quality management: the cost of quality.

What Makes Up The Cost of Quality?

The cost of quality is made up of two things:

  • Cost of conformance
  • Cost of non-conformance.

Let’s look at each of those.

The Cost of Conformance

The cost of conformance is all about the work you put in to get a quality result. It’s the time and effort taken to ensure that the outcome is what you would expect and what meets your quality targets.

It is made up of things like:

  • Training courses: both the cost of doing the course and paying the trainer etc and the time involved in putting people through the course.
  • Documentation: the time taken to write it and the cost of getting it printed (or, more likely, your websites amended to put the documentation online)
  • Verification and validation: any verification and validation activities you do to verify the deliverables against your quality plan.
  • Testing: the cost of testers or testing tools, plus the time taken to go through a full testing cycle.
  • Audits: if you are subject to formal quality audits, they take time and effort too.
  • Internal reviews: if you don’t have formal quality audits planned then you probably have informal reviews in your schedule. These also take time.

These activities cost money, and you pay out the money in the hope that the project’s deliverables will be better quality and that they will be used in the best possible way. The time and money spent on the cost of conformance is what you hope drives the best business value from your deliverables.

The Cost of Non-Conformance

Not working with quality in mind also costs money. Money drains through your contingency budget if you aren’t careful because not delivering things right first time takes its toll on your cost management and your project schedule.

For example:

  • Scrap: if you have to throw away deliverables and start again, that is wasted money and time.
  • Rework: equally, if you have to go back and polish deliverables because they weren’t right first time, that also costs money and time.
  • Complaint handling: unhappy stakeholders take time to talk round. You might also find your project funding baskets of fruit or something similar to apologise to people. It happens, but it costs money (and time).
  • Product recalls: you’ll see this in the press every so often, like the Toyota recall of cars with faulty airbags or the new tumble dryer we needed as our last one was recalled. The effort in managing a product recall, plus the cost of the negative publicity, is massive. You don’t want your project to be associated with that. Note that this cost may well come a while after your project is formally closed, but it’s still a cost to the company for a job that wasn’t done to the right quality standards.
  • Lost future business: let’s not forget that the cost of getting something wrong, even if you then do put it right, could be that the client doesn’t want to work with you again. That’s lost business and while it’s hard to put a financial figure on it you could if it results in them cancelling an existing contract.

On Balance…

So, getting to ‘quality’ can cost you from various aspects. Is it worth it? Absolutely. In fact, it’s more likely that the potential cost of non-conformance will far outweigh the cost of putting quality measures in place and following through on them.

Whether you currently do a formal quality plan or not, it’s a good idea to take a few minutes to work out whether the cost of quality is something that is being taken seriously by your project team at the moment. If not, what are you going to do about it to improve the quality culture and schedule in some cost of conformance tasks to give yourselves a better chance of success?


Posted on: September 19, 2016 12:00 AM | Permalink

Comments (5)

Please login or join to subscribe to this item
avatar
Russ Keenan Principal Consultant| Professional Services Consulting Southwest Washington State, United States
Excellent summary, Elizabeth; thank you for sharing. It's been my experience that one of the most common root causes of non-conformance and/or a lack of quality (i.e., cost of poor quality) results from the assumption that "everyone" knows what quality "is." Unfortunately, this type of assumption is a fatal flaw; the project manager, project team, and stakeholders all need to have a shared understanding of what success looks like, how success is defined, and what constitutes quality for your project (it can and usually is different for each project). Conversations on this topic need to start when developing the business case and project charter, considered in detail during project planning, incorporated in the stakeholder and risk registers, and reiterated as a on-going topic in project progress reporting.

avatar
Mayte Mata Sivera PMO Leader | Speaker | Author Ut, United States
Great summary! Very useful

avatar
Elok Robert Tee Project Manager| ST Engineering Electronics Pasir Ris, Singapore
:-D

avatar
John Diaz Owner| Precision Source Management Solutions West Covina, Ca, United States
Root cause for the non-conformance I have dealt with the past twelve months is "Training". The need to meet monthly budget regardless of quality. The system was allowed to deteriorate, inspectors failed to perform and worse yet manufacturing was blind to customer requirements. Quality ratings were dangerously low and customers were poised to cancel contracts. Schedules were developed for deliverables then developed yet one, and some cases two more times. customer returns was a daily occurrence. TRAINING has been incorporated company wide, inspectors, machinists, and all other positions up to the President of the company. The on time delivery ratings are increasing and the all so significant quality rating is recovering as well. "A less than robust quality system is and will be the death of a program.

avatar
Karthik T Senior Engineering Manager| Nike Bangalore, Karnataka, India
Good post; thanks

Please Login/Register to leave a comment.

ADVERTISEMENTS

"A pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity; an optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty."

- Winston Churchill

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsors