Project Management

The Reluctant Agilist

by
2018 Digital PM Summit | 2018 North American Global Scrum Gathering | 3PVantage | Abby Fretz | Adam Weisbart | Agile | agile | Agile 2013 | agile 2014 | agile 2015 | Agile 2017 | Agile 2018 | Agile Alliance | Agile and AI | Agile Centre | Agile Certification | Agile Coach | Agile Coaching | agile coaching | Agile Estimation | Agile for Humans | Agile Layoffs | Agile Leadership | Agile Metrics | Agile Planning | Agile PM | Agile PMO | Agile Practice | Agile Project Management | Agile Retrospectives | Agile Teams | Agile Transformation | agile transformation | Agile Transition | Agile Uprising | Agile Virtual Summit | agile2014 | agile2015 | agile42 | AgileUprising | Agilist | Agilistocrats | Agility Scales | AI | AI Agile Guy | AI and Agile | Alistair Cockburn | Amitai Schleier | Applied Frameworks | Atlassian | autism | Bas Vodde | Becky Hartman | Behavioral Change | BigVIsible | BigVisible | Bob Tarne | book review | Braden Cundiff | Brandon Brown | Brett Harned | Brian Bozzuto | Bureau of Digital | Business Agility | business agility | CAL | Cara Turner | Carol McEwan | carson pierce | Center for Non-Violent Communication | Certification | Certified Agile Leadership | Certified Scrum Master | Certified Scrum Product Owner | Certified Scrum Trainer | ChatGPT | Cheif Product Owner | Chet Hendrickson | Chris Li | Chris Sims | Christine Converse | Christopher Avery | Coaching | Collaboration | collaboration | Collaboration Equation | commitment | conflict management | Connection | conteneo | Craig Larman | cross functional teams | Crosswind | CrosswindPM | CSM | CSP | CSPO | CST | Culture | DA | DAD | Daily Scrum | Dan Eberle | Daniel Gullo | Dave Prior | Dave West | David Anderson | David Bernstein | David Bland | David J Anderson | Dean Leffingwell | Declan Whelan | Definition of Done | Dennis Stevens | Derek Huether | derek huether | Design | Design Thinking | Dhaval Panchal | Diana Larsen | diana larsen | Digital Agency | Digital PM Summit | Digital Transformation | digitalpm | Disciplined Agile Delivery | Distributed Teams | Don Kim | DPM | dpm | dpm2013 | Drunken PM | drunken PM | drunken pm | Drunken PM Radio | drunken pm radio | DrunkenPM | drunkenPM | drunkenpm | DrunkenPM Radio | drunkenPM Radio | drunkenpm radio | drunkenpmradio | drunkepm | eduscrum | Elsevier | emotional intelligence | empathy | Enterprise Agile | Eric Tucker | Essential Scrum | Esther Derby | esther derby | Evolve Agility | Excella | Five Lenses of Humane Management | Fixing Your Scrum | Flow | Flow Metrics | Focused Objective | focused objective | Forecasting | Gangplank | George Schlitz | Gil Broza | Global Scrum Gathering | Grandview Prep | Howard Sublett | Improv | Improv Effect | Individuals and Interactions | Jason Tanner | Jean Tabaka | Jeff Howey | Jeff Patton | Jeff Sutherland | Jesse Fewell | Jessie Shternshus | Jim Benson | jim benson | Jira | job market | Johanna Rothman | johanna rothman | John Miller | john miller | Jukka Lindstrom | Jurgen Appelo | Jutta Eckstein | Kanban | kanban | Kanban Pad | kanbanfor1 | Karim Harbott | Ken Rubin | Kenny Rubin | Kim Brainard | Knorr-Bremse | lacey | Language | Large Scale Scrum | Larry Maccherone | Laura Powers | LAVM | LeadingAgile | Lean | lean | Lean Agile Intelligence | Lean Agile Visual Management | Lean Coffee | Lean Kanban North America | LeanKit | LESS | LeSS | LeSS 2018 | Linda Rising | Lithespeed | Live Online | lkna | Louder Than Ten | luke hohmann | lyssa adkins | Management | Managing for Happiness | Maria Matarelli | Mark Kilby | Mark Lines | Marshall Rosenberg | Melissa Boggs | Metrics | metrics | Michael Grill | Michael Sahota | Michele Sliger | Mike Cottmeyer | Mike Vizdos | Modern Management Methods | Modus Cooperandi | modus cooperandi | Modus Institute | Natalie Warnert | Negotiation | Nic Sementa | Non-violent communication | North American Global Scrum Gathering | NVC | Obeya | Olaf Lewitz | Øredev | Øredev 2013 | organizational agility | Organizational Change | Organizational Design | organizational transformation | OrgWright | overcommitment | Pairing | Patrice Colancecco Embry | Paul Hammond | Personal Agility | Personal Kanban | personal kanban | personal productivity | personal project management | Peter Green | Peter Saddington | PMBOK | PMI | PMI Fellow | PMI-ACP | PMO | PMP | podcast | portfolio management | Precoil | Product Backlog | Product Development | Product Goal | Product Management | Product Owner | Product Ownership | Productivity | productivity | Project Management | project management | Project Management Institute | Project Manager | ProKanban | Rachel Gertz | Rally | recruitment | Release Planning | Reluctant Agilist | reluctant agilist | Remote Teams | Remote Work | Renata Lerch | Responsibility Process | retrospective | Richard Cheng | Roman Pichler | Ron Jeffries | Ross Beurmann | Ryan Ripley | SAFE | Safety | Sallyann Freudenberg | Sanjiv Augustine | Sarah Klarich | Scaled Agile Framework | Scaling Agile | scaling agile | Scaling Scrum | Scott Ambler | Scrum | scrum | Scrum Alliance | Scrum at Scale | Scrum Certification | Scrum Gathering | Scrum Gathering 2018 | Scrum Guide | Scrum in Schools | Scrum Master | Scrum.org | ScrumMaster | self organizing teams | SGNYC20 | SGPHX | SGPHX 2015 | Shane Hastie | Snehal Talati | social engineering | Software Development | SolutionsIQ | SoundNotes | SparkPlug Agility | Sparkplug Agility | Sprint Goal | Sprint Planning | sprint planning | Story Points | strategy | Sustained Agility | Systems Thinking | TDD | Temenos | Testing Business Ideas | The Agile Network | The Improv Effect | The Reluctant Agilist | Things | Tom Perry | Tony Johnson | Transformation | Trauma | Tricia Broderick | Troy Lightfoot | Troy Magennis | troy magennis | Trust | Untapped Agility | User Stories | value | Value Delivery System | Value Stream Mapping | Virtual Training | Vivek Angiras | Volunteering | waste | Waterfall | Weisbart | What We Say Matters | why limit wip | WIP | women in agile | Woody Zuill | work in progress | XP | Zach Stone | show all posts

About this Blog

RSS

Recent Posts

Mastering Troubled Projects: Strategies from Richard Broo

Adapt to Win! with Evan Campbell

Navigating AI in Business Strategy with John Tanner

The Art of Giving Feedback with Lonnie Weaver-Johnson 

Navigating Uncertainty: Preparing for Success in 2026 with Johanna Rothman and Mark Kilby

Categories

&Human,   reluctantagilist,  Agile Practice Guide,  Dave Prior,  Johanna Rothman,  LeadingAgile,  PMI,  reluctant agilist, 20 Hour, 2017 Digital PM Summit, 2018 Digital PM Summit, 2018 Digital Pm Summit, 2018 North American Global Scrum Gathering, 2018 Scrum Gathering, 2019 NAGS, 2019 North American Global Scrum Gathering, 2019 Scrum Gathering, 3PVantage, 4-Hour Body, 4-Hour Chef, 4-Hour Work Week, 5S, 6 Enablers of Business Agility, 7 Rules for Positive Productive Change, A Life of Productivity, a-team, Aakash Srinivasan, Aaron Irizarry, Abby Fretz, accelerating product value, accountability, Active Listening, Adam Weisbart, Adapt, Adapt to Win!, adaptability, Adaptivity, Adaptivity, Adaptivity Group, ADDAF, ADDIE, Adding Work to Sprints, Adrenalline Junkies, Adrian Howard, Agency, agency, agency culture, AgencyAgile, agentic, Agents, Agile, Agile, Agile, Agile, Agile, Agile, Agile, Agile, Agile, Agile, Agile, Agile, agile, agile, agile, agile, Agile 2013, agile 2014, agile 2015, Agile 2017, Agile 2018, Agile 2018 Keynote, AGile 2019, Agile 2019, Agile 2025, Agile 2025, Agile 2025, Agile Adlibs, Agile Alliance, Agile Alliance, Agile Alliance, Agile Alliance, agile alliance, agile alliance, Agile and AI, Agile and Artificial Intelligence, Agile and Jazz, agile and lean program management, Agile and Waterfall, Agile and Waterfall Planning, Agile Antipatterns, Agile Assessment, Agile at Home, Agile Atlas, Agile Austin, Agile Baltimore, Agile Bear, Agile Business, agile caravanserai, Agile Centre, Agile Certificaiton, Agile Certification, Agile Classroom, Agile Coach, Agile Coach, Agile Coaching, agile coaching, Agile Coaching Ethics Initiative, Agile Coaching Income Report, agile coaching institute, Agile Coaching Layoffs, Agile Coffee, Agile Cognitive Bias, Agile Conference, Agile Conference, Agile conference, agile conference, Agile Development and Design Techniques, Agile Digital Agency, Agile Enterprise, Agile Estimation, Agile Ethics, Agile Fluency, Agile for All, Agile for Humans, agile hardware, Agile Heretic, Agile in 3 Minutes, Agile in Digital, Agile in Education, agile in education, Agile in the Wild, Agile Layoffs, Agile Leadership, Agile Management, Agile Manifesto, agile marketing, agile marketing academy, Agile methodologies, Agile Metrics, Agile Mindset, Agile Mini Con, Agile Negotiation, Agile outside of Software, Agile Path FM, Agile Physics, Agile Planning, Agile Planning, Agile PM, Agile PMO, agile portfolio management, Agile Practice, Agile Product Development, Agile product ownership, Agile Project Management, agile project management, Agile Project Manager, Agile Quantified, Agile Retrospectives, Agile Risk Management, Agile Roles, Agile Schools, agile schools, Agile Steve, Agile Teams, Agile Tracking, Agile Transformation, Agile Transformation, Agile Transformation, agile transformation, agile transformation, agile transformation, agile transformation, agile transformation, Agile Transformation Office, Agile Transformation Playbook, Agile Transition, Agile Tribes, Agile Uprising, Agile Velocity, Agile Virtual Summit, Agile-Lean-NYT, agile2014, agile2015, agile2015 agile 2015, Agile2025, Agile2025, agile42, Agile4All, AgileAI, AgileBrain, AgileClassroom, AgileCraft, AgilePathFM, AgileScout, AgileUprising, Agilist, Agilistocrats, Agilitrix, agility, Agility Prime Solutions, Agility Prime Solutions, Agility Scales, AgilityScales, AI, AI, AI, AI, AI, AI, AI, AI, AI, AI Agile Guy, AI and Agile, AI and Scrum, AI deployment, AI in creativity, AI in project management, AI integration, AI Literacy, AI tools, AI transformation, Ainsley Nies, Al Goerner, Al Goernor, Al Shalloway, Alan Dayley, Alan Dayley, Alex Brown, alex silva, alexandre silva, Alistair Cockburn, Amitai Schleier, Analytics, Anderson Diniz Hummel, Anderson Hummel, Andreas Schliep, Andrew Leff, Andrew Stellman, Andy Jordan, Andy Repton, Angela Harms, Angie Stecovich, Anna Beatrice Scott, anthropic, anti-fragility, Anti-pattern, antifragility, Antipattern, Antipattern. Agile, Anu Smalley, Applied Frameworks, Applying Metrics for Predictability, Archetype, Art of Coaching, Art of War, art of war, Artificial Intelligence, Artificial Intelligence, artificial intelligence, artificial intelligence, Ashley Lucio, Assumptions, Assumptions Mapping, Atif Rafiq, Atlassian, Atlassian Analytics, Atlassian Experience Canvas, ATS, Audreww Tara Sahota, autism, AVS, awareness, Backlog Management, Backlog Prioritization, Backlog Refinement, baker, Bas Vodde, Becky Hartman, Bees, Behavioral Change, behavioral science, Bernie Maloney, Beyond Legacy Code, Beyond User Stories, Big Consulting, Big Visible, BigVIsible, BigVisible, Billy McLaughlin, bimodal, Bjorn Jensen, Black Lives Matter, Blackie, Blake Halvorson, Bland, blocked, blockedapp, blueprint, blueprint education, Bob Payne, Bob Sarni, Bob Tarne, book review, book signings, Book Writing, book writing, Boozy Scrum, Braden Cundiff, brainstorming, Brandon Brown, Brandon R. Brown, Brent Beer, Brett Harned, Bria Johnson, Brian Bozzuto, Broza, Build Your Own Scrum, Building Resilience, Building Trust, Bureau of Digital, Bureau of Digital, Bureau of Digital, Business Agility, business agility, Business Agility Canvas, Business Model Canvas, Business Planning, Business Portfolio Management, Business Solutions, business strategy, business value estimation, Buzzword, C4G Enterprises, CAL, candidate experience, Canton Coders, Capacity Planning, Capala Consulting, CapEx, Cara Turner, career advice, Career Development, Career Growth, Career Path, Cargotec, Carl Smith, Carol Dweck, Carol McEwan, carson pierce, Cass Van Gelder, Catherine Louis, Celeste Giampetro, Center for Non-Violent Communication, Certification, Certified Agile Leadership, Certified Scrum Master, Certified Scrum Master, Certified Scrum Product Owner, Certified Scrum Product Owner, Certified Scrum Product Owner, Certified Scrum Product Owner Scrum, Certified Scrum Professional, Certified Scrum Trainer, Cesar Idrovo, CFD, CFDs, Change, Change Fatigue, Change Management, Change Management, Change Management, change management, change management, change management, Change Managment, Changing Sprint Commitment, Charlie Rudd, Charlotte DiBartolomeo, Charter, Chat GPT, ChatGPT, Cheif Product Owner, Cheif Scrum Master, Chet Hendrickson, Chief Product Owner, Chief Scrum Master, Chief ScrumMaster, Chief SM, ChowNow, Chris Bailey, Chris Clarke, Chris Geary, Chris Li, chris matts, Chris Murman, Chris Murman, Chris Sims, Chris Spagnuolo, Christina Bang, Christine Converse, Christine Li, Christine Neidhardt, Christopher Avery, Christopher Hadnagy, christopher hadnagy, Cleaning Toxic Waste, Client, Client Relationships, client relationships, Climate, cnvc, Coach Cain, Coach's Clinic, Coaches Clinic, Coaching, coaching, coaching, coaching, coaching, Coaching Certification, CodeX, Collabnet, Collaboration, Collaboration, Collaboration, collaboration, collaboration, collaboration, collaboration, collaboration, collaboration, Collaboration Equation, Collaboration Equation, Collaborative Teamwork, Colleen Johnson, Colleen Johnson, commitment, communication, communication, communication, communication, communication, communication, Communication Plan, communication skills, communications, Communications Management, Community, community support, company culture, company values, Comparative Agility, Comparing Teams, Conference, conference preparation, Conference Proposal, Confidence Rubric, Conflict, conflict, conflict facilitation as a leadership skill, conflict management, Connecting, Connection, Conscious Communication, construal level theory, Consulting, Consulting, conteneo, context, continuous evaluation, Continuous Improvement, Continuous Improvement, Continuous Improvement, Converge, coppertone, Core Cycle of Agile Product Development, corporate culture, Counteracting The Systemic Oppression of Traditional Development Thinking, Couple of Coaches, Cozy Juicy Real, Craig Larman, Creative Courage Summit, creative processes, Creativity Safety, credible information, crisis communications, cross functional teams, Cross Functionality, Cross-Functionality, CrossFunctionality, Crosswind, CrosswindPM, CSM, CSM, CSP, CSP Fast Pass, CSPO, CSPO, CSPO, CST, cst, Cultivating Transformation, Cultural Change, Culture, culture, Cumulative Flow Diagram, cumulative flow diagrams, Customers, Cutlefish, Cycle Time, cycle time, DA, DAD, Daily Scrum, Damon Poole, Dan Brown, Dan Eberle, daniel goleman, Daniel Gullo, Darkest Timeline, Darren Petersen, Daryl Kulak, data, data management, Data Science, Data-Driven Change, Dave Prior, Dave Prior, Dave Prior, Dave Prior, Dave Prior, Dave Prior, Dave Prior, Dave Prior, Dave Prior, Dave Prior, Dave Prior, Dave Prior, Dave Prior, Dave Prior, Dave Prior, Dave Prior, Dave Prior, Dave Prior, Dave Prior, Dave Prior, Dave Prior, Dave Prior, Dave Prior, Dave Prior, Dave Prior, Dave Prior, Dave Prior, Dave Prior, Dave Prior, Dave Prior, Dave Prior, Dave Prior, Dave Prior, Dave Prior, Dave prior, Dave prior, dave prior, dave prior, dave prior, Dave West, David Anderson, David Bernstein, David Bland, David Hawks, David J Anderson, David Luke, David Marquet, Dean Leffingwell, Dean Stevens, Decision Making, decision making, decision making, Declan Whelan, decommoditization, Decoupling Cadences, defining value, Definition of Done, Deliver Better Results, Delivery, Delivery Better Results, Denise Jacobs, Denma, Dennis Stevens, Dennis Stevens, Dependencies, Derek Heuther, Derek Huether, derek huether, Descaling Agile, Design, Design Thinking, Designing Together, Devin Hedge, DevSecOps, Dhaval Panchal, Diana Larsen, diana larsen, Digital Agency, digital agency, digital marketing, Digital PM, Digital PM, Digital PM Summit, Digital PM Summit, Digital Pm Summit, digital PM summit, Digital PM Summit 2014, Digital Project Management, Digital Project Manager, Digital Transformation, digital transformation, digitalpm, digitalpm dpm, Directing, Disciplined Agile, Disciplined Agile Certification, Disciplined Agile Delivery, Disciplined Agile Framework, Discover to Deliver, Discovery Curves, Distributed, Distributed Team, Distributed Teams, Distributed teams, Diversity, documentation, Dom Price, Don Gray, Don Kim, Don McGreal, DPM, dpm, DPM 2014, DPM 2017, DPM Philly, DPM Summit, DPM Summit 2017, DPM Summit 2018, dpm2013, Dr. Abbie Marono, Dr. Rick Brinkman, DragonForceSUCKS!, druneknPM, Drunken PM, drunken PM, drunken pm, Drunken PM Radio, Drunken PM Radio, Drunken PM Radio, Drunken PM Radio, Drunken PM Radio, Drunken PM Radio, Drunken PM Radio, Drunken PM Radio, Drunken PM Radio, Drunken PM Radio, Drunken PM Radio, Drunken PM Radio, Drunken PM Radio, Drunken PM Radio, Drunken PM Radio, Drunken PM Radio, Drunken PM radio, Drunken PM radio, drunken PM Radio, drunken PM Radio, drunken PM Radio, drunken PM Radio, drunken PM Radio, drunken PM Radio, drunken PM radio, drunken PM radio, drunken pm radio, drunken pm radio, drunken pm radio, drunken pm radio, drunken pm radio, drunken pm radio, drunken pm radio, drunken pm radio, drunken pm radio, drunken pm radio, drunken pm radio, drunken pm radio, drunken pm radio, drunken pm radio, DrunkenPM, DrunkenPM, DrunkenPm, drunkenPM, drunkenPM, drunkenPM, drunkenPM, drunkenPM, drunkenPM, drunkenPm, drunkenpm, drunkenpm, drunkenpm, drunkenpm, drunkenpm, drunkenpm, drunkenpm, drunkenpm, drunkenpm, drunkenpm, drunkenpm, drunkenpm, drunkenpm, drunkenpm, drunkenpm, drunkenpm, drunkenpm, drunkenpm, drunkenpm, drunkenpm, drunkenpm, drunkenpm, drunkenpm, drunkenpm, drunkenpm, drunkenpm, drunkenpm, drunkenpm, drunkenpm, drunkenpm, DrunkenPM Radio, drunkenPM Radio, drunkenPM Radio, drunkenPM Radio, drunkenPM radio, drunkenpm radio, drunkenpm radio, drunkenpmradio, drunkenpmradio, drunkenpmradio, drunkepm, ducks, Eastern Standard, eckstein, ecosystem, ecosystem thinking, Ed Stockwell, edge, Edge Collection, edu scrum, Education, eduscrum, Edward Kay, efficiency, efficiency, efficiency, Eight Shapes, Elizabeth Harrin, Elizabeth Hendrickson, Elizabeth McClellan, Ellen Gottesdiener, Elsevier, Elusive Agile Enterprise, Emily Epstein, Emotional Intelligence, emotional intelligence, emotional intelligence, Emotional Science, Empathy, empathy, empathy, empathy, employee engagement, employment, Empowerment, empowerment, energy management, english heritage, Enterprise Agile, enterprise readiness, epic bedtime story, Eric Tucker, Erich Hahn, Erika Lenz, Essential Scrum, Esther Derby, esther derby, Estimating, Ethics, Evan Campbell, EVEF, Even Better Podcast, Evernote, Every Voice Engaged, Evolve Agility, EvolveAgility, Excella, excella, Excella Consulting, Executive Coaching, Experience, Experience Map, Experiments, Explore It!, extreme manufacturing, Extreme Programming, Facilitation, fading problems, Failing Sprints, fast feedback, Fearless Agiity, Fearless Agility, FearlessAgility, feedback, feedback models, field guide, Film Making, Film Production, First 20 Hours, First15, Fit for Purpose, Five Lenses, Five Lenses of Humane Management, Fixing Your Scrum, flavio steffens, FLEX, Flight Levels, FLIP, Flip, Flow, flow, Flow Metrics, flow metrics, Focused Objective, focused objective, FocusedObjective, Forbes, Forecasting, Formula Ink, FormulaInk, Frank Vega, Fred George, Frederick Taylor, Frederick Taylor, freudenberg, friction, From Theater to Flow, Funding, Future of Agile, Galen Low, Games, Gangplank, Gary Gagliardi, gender bias, Gene Bounds, generation agile, Geoffrey Moore, Geographically Distributed Teams, George Floyd, George Schlitz, George Schlitz, Getting Things Done, Gil Broza, Giora Morein, girl scouts, Girls Guide to PM, girlscouts, Github, giving feedback, Glassel Ventures, Global Congress, Global Scrum Gathering, Global Scrum Gathering Austin, governance, Grandview Prep, Greenhopper, Greg Storey, growth mindset, GTD, Habit, hackathon, HappyCog, Harvard Business Review, HBR, Head First Agile, Healing Container, Hearst Digital Media, Heart of Agile, Henry Poydar, hero, High-Performing Team, hiring, Homeschooling, honesty, Hong Li, Hope Schools, Howard Sublett, HUGE, HUGE Inc, Hugo Bowne-Anderson, human behavior, human hacking, Human Side of Agile, human-centered design, humane workspace, humane workspace, humane workspaces, Hummingbird Agility, Hybrid, hybrid, Hybrid Agile, hybrid projects, Hyderabad, hyperfocus, I Think Therefore I Plan, Iain Fraser, ICAgile, Ice Breaker, Ideation Framework, Ignite, Igniteii, Ilker Demirel, Impact Mapping, Implementing Scrum, imposter syndrome, Improv, Improv Effect, ImprovEffect, Improving Scrum.org, improvisation, Increment of Work, independent consulting, Individuals and Interactions, influence, InfoQ, infrastructure, Innovation, innovation, innovation games, innovative hiring, Insighttimer, InspireMe!, Insurgent Agility, Insurgent Pictures, intent, Intent Based Leadership, intentional actions, intentions, internal communications, International Consortium for Agi, interview strategies, Introvert, introvert resources, intuition, IT Funding, IT Strategy, it's not all about me, IT-Agile, J.B. Rainsberger, Jabe Bloom, Jack Skeels, Jacquelyn Talpalar, James Gifford, James Grenning, James Tamm, Jardena London, Jargon, Jason LIttle, Jason Tanner, Jasper, Jean Tabaka, Jed and Sophia, Jed Lazar, Jeff Howey, Jeff Leach, Jeff Patton, Jeff Sutherland, jellybend, Jennifer Tharp, Jenny Greene, Jerry Weinberg, Jesse Fewell, Jesse Wroblewski, Jessica Katz, Jessica Kerr, Jessica Small, Jessica Wolfe, jessica wolfe, Jessie Shternshus, Jill Paul, Jim Benson, Jim Benson, jim benson, Jim Elvridge, Jim Tamm, Jimi Fosdick, Jimi Fosdick, JIRA, Jira, Jira Insights, JJ Sutherland, job application, job market, job market, job search, job search, job titles, job to be done, Joe Justice, Joe Vallone, Joel Norman, Johanna Rothman, johanna rothman, johanna rothman, John Cutler, John D Cook, John Le Drew, John Miller, john miller, John Rudd, John Tanner, John Tanner, Johnu, Johnu Marattil, Jorgen Hesselberg, Josh Hill, Josh Wexler, journaling, Journey to Enterprise Agility, Juan Banda, Judith Lasater, Judy Neher, Jukka Lindstrom, Jurgen Appelo, Jurgen Appelo, Justin Handler, Justin Koke, Jutta Eckstein, kamal manglani, Kanban, Kanban, Kanban, Kanban, Kanban, kanban, kanban, Kanban Certification, Kanban Metrics, Kanban metrics, Kanban Pad, kanbanfor1, karen prior, Karim Harbott, Kate Sullivan, Katherine Kirk, kay keizer, Kelly Harris, Ken Rubin, Ken Schwaber, Kenny Rubin, kevin mitnick, Keynote, Kid Cedek, Kim Brainard, Knorr-Bremse, Krista Pierce, Kyle Macey, L. David Marquet, lacey, LAI, Lance Hammond, Language, Language is a virus, language of intent, Large Scale Scrum, Larissa Scordato, Larman, Larry Maccherone, Larsen, Lasater, Laura Powers, LAVM, Layoffs, Lead Without Blame, Lead Without Blame, Leadership, Leadership, Leadership, leadership, leadership, leadership, leadership, leadership, leadership, leadership, leadership, Leadership Gift, Leadership Gift Program, Leadership is Language, Leadership is Language, Leadership Mindset, leadership training, Leading Change, LeadingAgile, Lean, lean, Lean Agile Intelligence, Lean Agile Visual Management, Lean Coffee, Lean Kanban North America, Lean Kanban University, lean metrics, Lean Portfolio Management, Lean Startup, Lean Systems Engineering, Lean-Agile, Lean-Agile Visual Management, LeanAgile Intelligence, LeanCoffee Meetings, Leanintuit, LeanKit, learning opportunities, learning quickly, Lee Lis, Leffingwell, lego game, LESS, LeSS, LeSS 2018, Lessons Learned, Lia James, lie to me, Lifestyle Design, Liftoff, Linda Rising, Lisa Hershman, Listening, Lithespeed, Little's Law, Live Art, Live Online, lkna, Lonnie Weaver-Johnson, Lothar Schubert, Louder Than Ten, louder than ten, Lounder>10, LSE, Lucid Software, Luis Garcia, Luke Hohman, luke hohmann, Lullabot, Lyssa Adkins, lyssa adkins, Machine Learning, Macromanagers, Magennis, Major League Baseball, Malena Jacobsen, Manage Others, Manage your Organization, Manage Yourself, Management, Managing for Happiness, Managing Multiple Projects, Managing the Unmanagable, Managing Up, Manny Gonzalez, Manoj Vadakkan, Marc Johnson, marcello scacchetti, Margareth Carneiro, Maria Matarelli, Mario Melo, Mark Crowe, Mark Hodgdon, mark inside, MARK KILBY, Mark Kilby, mark kilby, Mark Lines, Mark Price Perry, marketing, marketing, Marketing and Sales, Marketing for Supervillains, marketing user stories, Marshall Rosenberg, marshamallow challenge, Marty Bradley, Mary Kaufmann, Mastodon Consulting, matt barcomb, Matt Payton, MBOK, McGraw-Hill, Measuring Agile, Meditation, meeting culture, meetings, Meghan McInerny, Melissa Boggs, Melissa Watts, mental health, Mentoring, mentorship, Merchi Reyes, MetalToad, Metrics, metrics, Metrics Cookbook, Michael de la Maza, Michael Dougherty, Michael Gillespie, michael gillespie, Michael Grill, michael lewis, Michael Sahota, michael spayd, Michael Tardiff, Michael Tibbert, Michele Sliger, Michelle Dennis, Mickey W. Mantle, Mid Sprint Review, Mid-Sprint Review, Middle Management, MidSprint Review, Mighty Citizen, Mika Trottier, Mike Anderson, Mike Caddell, Mike Cottmeyer, Mike Griffiths, Mike McCalla, Mike Monteiro, Mike Vizdos, Millenial, mindfulness, mindset, Minneapolis Scrum Gathering, misinformation, mistakes, mitch lacey, MLB, MMM, Mob Programming, mob programming, Mobbing, Mode 0, Mode 1, Mode 2, Modern Management Methods, Modus, Modus Cooperandi, modus cooperandi, Modus Institute, Modus Institute, Molood Ceccarelli, moneyball, Monte Carlo Analysis, Monte Carlo Simulation, motivational interviewing, Mun-Wai Chung, Munich, MVP, NAGC, Nanette Brown, narrative storytelling, Natalie Warnert, Negotiation, networking, networking, neuro-diversity, Neurodiversity, Neuroinclusivity, neurolinguistic programming, New York Times, Nic Sementa, Nigel Baker, ninja, ninja baker priest, NLP, No, No Estimates, No One Is Coming to Save You, Non Violent Communication, non-fiction, non-fiction writing, non-technical project manager, Non-violent communication, Nonviolent Communication, noop, North American Global Scrum Gathering, Not a Cylon, NVC, O3 World, Oakbay, Oakbay Consulting, oakland a's, Obeya, Object-Oriented Data-Driven Change, off shore, Offshoring, OKRs, Olaf Lewitz, Olav Maassen, OnAgile 2017, one shiny object, Online Scrum Class, OnPay, optimization, Øredev, Øredev 2013, Organizational Agility, organizational agility, Organizational Change, Organizational Change, Organizational Change, organizational change, organizational change, organizational culture, Organizational Design, organizational psychology, organizational transformation, organizational transformation, OrgWright, Outcome Based Planning, overcoming fear, Overcomitment, overcommitment, Overplaying, PAC, Pairing, Pam Corbin, Parikshit Basrur, paris, Patrice Colancecco Embry, Patrice Embry, patrice embry, Paul Argiry, paul ekman, paul f. kelly, Paul Hammond, Pebble Post, Peopleware, Performance, performance reviews, persona, Personal Accountability, Personal Accountability Teams, Personal Agility, personal agility canvas, personal development, personal development, personal development, personal growth, Personal Kanban, Personal Kanban, personal kanban, personal kanban, Personal Productivity, personal productivity, personal project management, Personas, personas, Persuasion, Pete Oliver-Krueger, Peter Beck, Peter Green, peter green, Peter Saddington, Peter Stevens, Philadelphia, Philamade, Philip Diab, Phoenix, PI Planning, PI Planning, PK, pk, Plank, Planning, Planning Poker, play, PMBOK, PMI, PMI, PMI, PMI, PMI, PMI, pmi, PMI ACP, PMI Agile Alliance, PMI Agile Alliance, PMI Agile Alliance, PMI Agile Alliance, PMI Agile Practice Guide, PMI Board of Directors, PMI Fellow, PMI Global Congress, PMI-ACP, PMO, PMO, PMO, PMP, PMP, PMP vs Agile Project Manager, podcast, Poker Planning, Portfolio, Portfolio Management, Portfolio Management, portfolio management, Post Agile, Post-Agile, Post-SAFeism, Power of Focus, Power of No, Precoil, predictability, predicting value, Presentation, Presenting, priest, Principles of Scientific Management, Prioritization, Prioritizing Work, Probabilistic Forecasting, Produce Backlog Item, Product, Product Agility, Product Alignment, Product Backlog, Product Backlog Refinement, Product Design, Product Development, product development, Product Funding, Product Goal, Product Innovation, Product Management, Product Management, Product Management, Product Management, product management, product management, Product Manager, Product Manager, product manager, Product Outcomes, Product Owner, Product Owner, product owner, Product Ownership, Product Ownership, product ownership, Product Ownership Strategic Priority, Product Positioning, Product Roadmap, Product Strategy, Productivity, productivity, productivity, productivity, productivity, productivity, Productivity Project, Professional Coaching, Professional Development, professional development, professional development, Professional Kanban Certification, Professional Scrum Master, Professional Scrum Product Owner, Program Management, Project CodeX, project empathy, Project Funding, Project Management, Project Management, Project Management, Project Management, project management, project management, project management, project management, project management, project management, project management, project management, project management, project management, project management, project management, Project Management for Humans, Project Management Institute, Project Management Institute, Project Management Institute, Project Management Institute, project management professional, Project Management Rebels, Project Manager, project manager, project manager role, Project Managment, project portfolio management, project reporting, Project Review, project risk, project success, project success, ProjectManagement.com, Projet Chartering, ProKanban, ProKanban, Proxy Interviews, PSM, PSM, PSPO, psychological distancing, psychological safety, psychology, PTSD, Public Speaking, QA Manager, Qcon, Quality, Quality of Life, Quarterly Planning, Quarterly Planning, Questions, Rachel Gertz, rachel gertz, rachel howard, Radical Collaboration, Radtac, Rally, Rapid Testing Business Ideas, Ray Lewallen, Reaktor, real options, Rebecca Wirfs-Brock, receiving feedback, Recess, recruitment, recruitment challenges, Redefining the PMO, Redefining Your PMO, redkiteproject, REE, Reese Schmit, Reese Schmit, Reimagining Agile, Release Planning, Reluctant Agililist, Reluctant Agilist, Reluctant Agilist, Reluctant Agilist, Reluctant Agilist, Reluctant Agilist, Reluctant Agilist, Reluctant Agilist, Reluctant Agilist, Reluctant Agilist, Reluctant Agilist, Reluctant Agilist, Reluctant Agilist, Reluctant Agilist, Reluctant Agilist, Reluctant Agilist, Reluctant Agilist, Reluctant Agilist, Reluctant Agilist, Reluctant Agilist, Reluctant Agilist, Reluctant Agilist, Reluctant Agilist, Reluctant Agilist, Reluctant Agilist, Reluctant Agilist, reluctant Agilist, reluctant Agilist, reluctant Agilist, reluctant agilist, reluctant agilist, reluctant agilist, reluctant agilist, reluctant agilist, reluctant agilist, reluctant agilist, reluctant agilist, reluctant agilist, Remote, Remote Facilitation, Remote Forever, Remote Forever Summit, Remote Learning, Remote Team, Remote Teams, remote teams, Remote Work, remote work, remote work, RemoteForever, Renaissance Enterprise, Renata Lerch, Reporting, resilience, resilience, Resiliency, Resilient, Resource Management, Responsibility Process, resume tips, retrospective, retrospectives, review, Ricard Vargas, Richard Broo, Richard Cheng, Richard Cheng, richard cheng, Rick Brinkman, Right Environment Exercises, Risk Management, risk planning, Robert Sfeir, robin dreeke, Roman Pichler, Ron Jeffries, Ron Lichty, Ronica Roth, Rosenberg, Rosetta Agile, RosettaAgile, Ross Beurmann, Ross Beurmann, rothman, Russell Healy, Ryan Ripley, SAFE, SAFe, SAFe, safe spaces, SAFe Summit, Safety, Sage Commander, Sal, Salary, Salary Negotiation, sales engagement, Sallyann Freudenberg, sallyanne freudenberg, Sam Barnes, Same Team Partners, San Tsubota, Sandra Cain, Sandy Mamoli, Sanjiv Augustine, Santa Pays it Forward, Sara Doubleday, Sarah Goff-DuPont, Sarah Klarich, Sauce Labs, Savannah Rayat, Saying No, Scaled Agile Framework, Scaled Agile Framework, Scaling, Scaling Agile, scaling agile, Scaling Scrum, scatter focus, scatterfocus, schmonz, Schmonz.com, School of Rock, Science of High Performing Teams, Scientific Management, scope management, Scott Ambler, Scott Bellware, Scott Dunn, Scott Sehlhorst, Scott Sehlhorst, scripts, Scrum, Scrum, Scrum, Scrum, Scrum, scrum, scrum, scrum, Scrum Agile Transformation, Scrum Alliance, Scrum Alliance, Scrum and AI, Scrum Artifacts, Scrum at Scale, Scrum Certification, Scrum Certification, Scrum Certified Scrum Trainer, Scrum Educational Units, scrum field guide, Scrum Fieldbook, Scrum Gathering, scrum gathering, Scrum Gathering 2018, Scrum Gathering Dublin, scrum gathering paris 2013, Scrum Guide, Scrum in Education, Scrum in Realty, Scrum in Schools, Scrum Inc, Scrum Labs, Scrum Master, scrum master, Scrum Master Antipatterns, scrum metrics, Scrum Team, Scrum Trainer, Scrum Training, Scrum vs. Kanban, Scrum.org, Scrum.org, Scrum@Scale, ScrumAlliance, ScrumatScale, Scrummando, ScrumMaster, Scrummaster, ScrumMaster Scrum Master, Seer Interactive, self organizing teams, self-awareness, self-awareness, self-awareness, self-awareness, self-reflection, self-reflection, Self-Responsibility, Servant Leader, Servant Leadership, servant leadership, servant leadership, SEUs, SGNYC20, SGPHX, SGPHX 2015, Shane Hastie, Shannon Carter, Shit bad Scrum Master's Say, Showing Up, Si Alhir, Si Alhir, Sidebar, Sinikka Waugh, SIQ, situational leadership, Six Enablers of Business Agility, Slay the Meeting Monster, small bets, Snehal Talati, Social Change, social engineering, social engineering, Software Development, Software Testing, software tools, Solutions IQ, SolutionsIQ, SONSI, Sophia Lazar, Soulful Transformation, SoundNotes, Spark Plug Agility, SparkPlug Agility, Sparkplug Agility, Speaking, speedboat, Sprint, Sprint Backlog, Sprint Commitment, Sprint Forecast, Sprint Goal, Sprint Length, Sprint Planning, Sprint Planning, sprint planning, Sprint Review, Sprints and Milestones, Square, Staffing, stakeholder perception, Steady, Steffan Surdek, Stellman-Greene, stephen forte, Stephen Younge, Steve Elliott, Steve Holyer, Steve Winters, Steven Martin, steven slade, Stewart Copeland, stonehenge, Story Mapping, Story Points, Story Points Are Trash, Storylines, Strategic Funding, Strategy, strategy, Strategy Decay, Strategyzer, stress, stress, Stuart Young, submarine, success, Successful Distributed Teams, Sun Tzu, Sun Tzu, SuperHired, supervillains, Supply Chain, survival tips, Sustainable Practices, Sustained Agility, Suzanna Haworth, Suze Haworth, Swarming, Systems Thinking, Tabaka, TAC, tactical, tactics, tailoring resumes, takedown, Taking Whole, Tall Projects, TAN, TaskTop, tastycupcakes, Taylorism, TDD, team, team alignment, Team Charter, team communication, team coordination, team dynamics, team dynamics, team dynamics, team dynamics, team empowerment, Team Performance, team performance, Team Size, Team Structure, teamangle, Teams, teams in crisis, teamwork, Technical Debt, Technical Health, Technical Lead, Technical Manager, Technical Program Manager, Technical Project Manager, technology, Temenos, Template Zombies, Tera Caldwell Simon, Test Drive Development, Test Driven Development, Test Obsessed, Testing Assumptions, Testing Business Ideas, The Agile Network, The Agile Network, The Agile Network, The Agile Network, The Agile Path, the airplane game, The Art of War, the grifters, The Improv Effect, The Leadership Gift, The Productivity Project, The Red Kite Project, The Reluctant Agilist, The Reluctant Agilist, the reluctant agilist, The Ron, The Ticket That Exploded, Theory of Constraints, theStrayMuse Louder than Ten, Things, Think Louder, ThinkLouder, Thrive, Throughput, throughput, Tim Ferriss, Tim Ferriss Experiment, Tim Lister, Tim Wise, TJay Gerber, To Be Agile, Todd Miller, Together To Gather, Tom Beurmann, Tom Mellor, Tom Perry, Tom Smallwood, tom wujec, Tonianne DeMaria, Tonianne DiMaria, Tony Johnson, tools for clarity, Toyota, Tracking and Reporting, traditional project management, Training from the Back of the Room, Transformation, transformation, transformation, Transformation Blockers, Trauma, trauma, Travis Gertz, Trello, Tribes, Tricia Broderick, Tricia Broderick, troubled projects, Troy and Abed In The Morning, Troy Lightfoot, Troy Magennis, troy magennis, true north pmp consulting, Trust, trust, trust in AI, TrustTemenos, Turn The Ship Around, Turn the Ship Around, Twitch, Tyler Grant, Tyner Blain, TynerBlain, Ukraine, Unicat, unmasking the social engineer, Untapped Agility, Upstream Work, Urs Reupke, User Stories, User Story Points, Utilization, Val Hinze, value, Value Delivery, value delivery, Value Delivery System, Value Management Office, Value Matrix, Value Stream Management, Value Stream Map, Value Stream Mapping, value stream mapping, Velocity, velocity, VersionOne, Vic Bonacci, Victor Njoroge, villain, virtual board, Virtual Training, Vision Statement, Visual Agile Lexicon, Visual Collaboration, Visual Management, Visual Thinking, visualization, Vivek Angiras, Vizdos, VMO, Volunteer, Volunteering, volunteering, WahResume, Waltzing with Bears, waste, Waterfall, waterfall, Weisbart, Wesibart, What We Say Matters, why limit wip, Wikispeed, William Burroughs, Wingman-SW, WIP, WIP, women in agile, Woody Zuill, work culture, Work in Process, work in progress, work in progress, Work Item Age, Worker Owned Coop, Worker Owned Cooperative, Workflow Automation, workflow issues, workflow management, Workflows, workplace stress, XP, XPRolo, yellowpencil, Your Clear Next Step, Yvonne Marcus, Zach Stone, zach stone, Zeldman, Zen-PM

Date

Personal Kanban - What Makes You Happy?

linkedin twitter facebook Request to reuse this  


Track Your Happiness helped me gain a better understand of my unique issues with determining "value", but, in general, I think happiness is not really my bag... or at least, not the driving force behind my understanding of "value". While working on this project I have been talking with a lot of people who do evaluate things that way. They see the things they have an opportunity to do as either "things which make me happy" or "things which do not make me happy". So, the prioritization happens based on the degree of expected happiness or degree of expected unhappiness.

IMHO think the true goal is to find a way to uncover the aspect of whatever you are doing that can make you happy. It sounds simple, but it requires effort and discipline... it is far easier to just give in and wallow. Personal Kanban is supposed to help you understand your work better, and it has, but my increased awareness of how I perceive the work I have to do may be the most valuable thing I've picked up doing this. 

An even though using TrackYourHappiness.org was interesting, it never felt (to me) like it was measuring the right stuff. Happiness seemed close, but not quite close enough.

After some discussion with Boz, I began rating everything I do at 3 different points:

A) How I felt doing it (-3 to +3)
B) How I felt finishing it (-3 to +3)
C) Overall mirth from having it done (-3 to +3)

http://farm1.staticflickr.com/87/263228000_9513c97026_o.jpgOne of the things I realized in tracking the work I was doing was that for some items, the simple act of finishing it off can be as valuable as getting some newer items done.  This is especially true for the ones that have been sitting on the Kanban board smirking at you and taunting you in all their undone glory. The longer they sit the more mental and emotional weight they take on. 

It is probably also important to note that how progress is tracked has a toll as well. Capturing a 3 point ranking as I complete each task was okay on a post it - until I needed to extract the data electronically so I could analyze it. I was still struggling with letting go of Things and since I knew there was a way to extract the data I used that as my excuse to formally legitimize my inability to give up my favorite app. Unfortunately, my Coach asked me to try and see if I could work out how to use it to do Personal Kanban in a manner that was somewhat similar to what I had on my physical board.

It took a few tries, but I did manage to do get set up to do Personal Kanban in Things by grouping items into categories named after backlog columns.  As I completed each task, before I checked the box, I would assign it a 3-digit number based on the rating listed above. But, I don't think I ever moved anything into Doing... they just went from not done, to done.

After a few weeks Boz and I reviewed the results and for the most part, the information they offered were things that were already been apparent. Going through this process did have one very significant  result though. It caused me to pay more attention to how I felt about each thing I was doing while I was doing it and when I was finished doing it. I became more present with what I was doing and more aware of the impact it was having - which may be a significant contributor to the perception of value.

Using Things as a way to track all this also made me keenly aware of two additional points:

1. Trying to use Things to do Personal Kanban is kinda dumb

2. It was time to climb out of the value rabbit hole

My quest to understand the "value" of what I was doing had no clear answer save for the understanding that value can be a very subjective thing. I also had begun to feel like maybe the question was not, am I doing things that are not valuable, or how do I reduce the waste created by non-value adding activities, but how do I balance all the valuable things I want to work on. So, in many ways I was back to where I started.

http://farm4.staticflickr.com/3529/3229050640_ed5393886a_o.jpgI have lots to do.
I want/need to do it all.
I have limited time.
I need a way to decide what to do first - always

One key difference though is that as I continue to work through this, I am becoming more aware of how I am working and why. There are things in the system which are (technically) waste. Maybe those things needs to be there to keep the rest of the system in balance.

{Insert Climactic Ending Here}

If we were machines, perhaps all waste would be bad. Waste dampens productivity. But, we are not machines and maybe those dampeners are part of how we maintain our own productive flow. In examining the waste in my Personal Kanban practice, I have observed that it exists and that the effort required to eliminate that waste may not be worth the squeeze.

Posted on: June 26, 2013 12:07 AM | Permalink | Comments (0)

Personal Kanban - Track Your Happiness

linkedin twitter facebook Request to reuse this  

When my efforts to employ Personal Kanban reached a point where I felt I had gone as far as I could on my own, I decided it would be a good idea to find a coach who could hopefully help me see things more objectively, challenge me on the assumptions I was not conscious of and, in general, find a way to become more disciplined in my approach. (The expectation was that more discipline would result in greater productivity.)

Brian Bozzuto, an Agile Coach from BigVisible was kind enough to agree to act as my coach. We worked together for several weeks on a number of different aspects of my approach to Personal Kanban.  I’m going to try and take these on at a time in different postings.

When we started out discussions about my approach to Personal Kanban, one of my biggest questions was how to understand value. I was operating under the idea that anything that does not add value is waste and should be eliminated. There are things with clear value (doing work you get paid for) and things which present no obvious value (sitting on the couch watching a movie), but which have value in terms of a longer game because they are restorative in some way.  Still, I was having a hard time in my internal argument for some of the latter.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/mrf/179339094/sizes/l/in/photostream/In interviewing people about their use of Personal Kanban, I encountered many who said they prioritized work solely by what makes them “happy”. A few of these people said they only do things that bring them as much joy as a child feeding ducks.

Which left me wondering… who changes the cat litter?

Boz and I talked for a while about happiness and he suggested we both sign up for Track Your Happiness. This was something he had not done before either so he also agreed to sign up for the experiment. The service is free. For a period of time the service will send you an invite (via SMS or email) to log on to their site and take a quick survey of what you are doing, and how you are feeling about it. It also provides some basic reporting so you can see what information the data has to offer about how “happy” you are.

You can adjust the frequency of the surveys. They continue until the report has enough data for it to be able to offer you some insights. After that it is supposed to begin polling you again at some point in the future.

When you take the surveys, some of them have questions which clearly make sense and some which can start to seem rather tiresome because you get asked them again and again. And there are some that are quite amusing. I often received a question asking what I was doing at that moment. The options included things like:

Working

Watching Television

Meditating

Praying

Making love to another person

… If you decide to try out Track Your Happiness and you feel compelled to stop and answer a survey while you are making love… I really don’t think Personal Kanban is going to solve your problems.

During the first few days I got a report that showed this:

What the service was telling me was that, based on my responses up to that point, the place where I was happiest was at the airport. Initially, this seemed horribly wrong on many levels. At the very least it seemed comedically pathetic. But, on second thought, the airport is one of the places I am usually the least stressed. I always arrive extra early, I book my flights with lots of in between time, and in the aiport I’m generally just spending time in my bubble, headphones on, working or reading. Other than my borderline obsessive fear of germs from other passengers, it’s a pretty chill place for me. (I should also point out that by this point in time I had only been using Track Your Happiness while I was on the road. So no surveys had been completed while I was at home.

As I used the service and kept reviewing the reports, I started to wonder if happiness was really a good way to frame value within the context of Personal Kanban. The “happy as a kid feeding ducks” thing weighed quite heavily into that. (I should mention that this explanation of the kid feeding a duck thing is slightly incorrect. This will be revisited in a separate post in the future.)

In the end, I have come to the conclusion that there are people who try to prioritize their work so that they only do what makes them happy. From speaking with these people, they tend to delegate or refuse to do things that do not make them happy. For me, and the way I look at the things I do, there are things that I do which clearly bring me happiness, like taking my wife out to dinner or playing a game with my daughter. And there are things I do that, initially, do not seem to have happiness to offer me.  I believe that when faced with those types of things to do, regardless of what it is, it is the frame with which we look at the thing which helps us see value in it, or not. For example, I may have a very difficult client to deal with. This may be someone I had a history of trouble communicating with. Rather than approaching it with a “this will not bring me happiness mindset”, I try to remember to approach it with “what positive thing can I derive from this encounter”. If it is a difficult client, maybe it is as simple as trying to improve my ability at being present and actively listening to them, or being diplomatic, or understanding their body language and trying to use my own to see if it can impact the situation in a favorable way.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/caveman_92223/3347745000/Going through this exercise of spending a few weeks completing the surveys was incredibly helpful in developing my understanding of how I see value. The biggest epiphany for me was realizing that I actually like pretty much everything I do, in one way or another. Before going through this survey I had no awareness of that and would never have agreed with this statement. Going through the process of being questioned over and over about whether or not I would prefer to be doing something else made me keenly aware of the fact that my issue is not that I have things which make me happy and things which make me unhappy. I just have things that, in one way or another, make me happy. I enjoy doing all of them either because of the action of doing them, or the benefits they provide.

Realizing this was a significant discovery for me. Unfortunately, it brought me right back to where I started. I have many things to do. My challenge with prioritization is that I want to do them all. To one extent or another, they all provide value for me. 

http://pixabay.com/p-37541/?no_redirectSo at this point, the question is not “does it provide value”, but “does something else provide more value”, or how to I balance the “valuable” things I am doing so that there is enough work, enough personal, etc.?

Posted on: June 12, 2013 10:46 AM | Permalink | Comments (1)

Zen and the Art of Personal Kanban Maintenance

linkedin twitter facebook Request to reuse this  

Personal Kanban Weeks 13-16: 

Zen and the Art of Personal Kanban Maintenance

 

Phaedrus had Quality
I have Value

The more I examine my approach to getting work done, the more I am aware of the inefficiency I have baked into it. The more I study about Lean, the more I become concerned about "waste". Waste is bad. Waste must be exterminated!

 

But what about the waste that is in there on purpose? Is that really waste?

When I teach classes, I bring a few extra workbooks for students, just in case. Most of the time, it goes in the trash at the end. So, the waste of creating extra materials for extra money is made worse by discarding it at the end of the class. Massive waste. However, that waste provided me with peace of mind that enabled me to be better focused on teaching the class. So, was it really waste?

To understand what waste is occurring and where it is taking place,  I need to understand what I am doing that does not contribute to "value".

Value = ?

In interviewing people about Personal Kanban, several of them said they prioritize work based on what makes them happy and that they only do things with make them happy. 

Initially, this sounded great, but, 

IF (value = happy)

THEN (who changes cat litter?)

I wasn't doubting the people who told me they prioritize based on what makes them happy, I was just struggling with all the other stuff that still had to get done.  When I asked what they did with the work that did not make them happy, they said they would delegate it if it was truly necessary. This was not something I was able to envision applying to my own world though.  I have no one to delegate to.

(Minions would be nice.) Even if I did, the thought of just dumping all the not happy work on them does not seem entirely in synch with my understanding of  servant leadership. 

I am clearly struggling with "value". I need some help.

Milestone...

To mark the halfway point in my 6-month experiment with Personal Kanban here is an update on where I am with it…

Original Goals - 100% achieved

1. I have learned more about how Kanban works and how it is different from Personal Kanban.

2. I have demonstrated to myself that I am capable of actually practicing some version of Personal Kanban

Having reached a point where I have solved my initial questions (above), I realized that to go any further with this I was going to need to solve a different (bigger) question:

What is value?

I also realized that if I wasn't going to go the same route as Phaedrus, I was going to need some assistance. 

While I've coached teams in Agile, I've never actually had a coach myself. This seemed like the perfect opportunity. I asked Brian Bozzuto if he would be kind enough to coach me and he was kind/foolish enough to agree to work with me for a few weeks. During our initial calls we talked about a number of topics which I will be posting about in the coming weeks. One of these, however, was "value".  After discussing the prioritizing by happiness approach, it seemed that defining happiness first would be key.  Boz suggested we both try an experiment. We each signed up for Track Your Happiness http://www.trackyourhappiness.org/. Once you sign up you begin receiving polls from them a few times a day trying to determine your relative level of happiness. After you complete a number of surveys they create a report that is designed to provide you with a better understanding of the things which truly bring you happiness. 

In the next post I will explain why the DFW is (sadly) my happy place.

Posted on: June 03, 2013 06:31 PM | Permalink | Comments (1)

Personal Kanban : The Heart of Darkness

linkedin twitter facebook Request to reuse this  
 
 
 

Personal Kanban Experiment... Weeks 10-12


Kanban. (expletive) Still only in Kanban. Every time I think I’m gonna wake up back in the GTD…

Towards the end of my experiment with Kanban-for-1 I was feeling like I had lost my way. I was still carrying too much work to be able to make use of Kanban-for-1, but my attempts at using it had taught me a number of useful things.
  1. Whatever I use, it needs to be completely portable.
  2. Whatever I use needs to be available to me whether I am online or off.
  3. Whatever I use needs to be simple enough that the act of using it does not become a time/productivity suck. The tool can’t be in my way.
  4. I really like working with a physical board and would like something as close to that as possible.
  5. When I am home, and using the physical board on the wall, the process works quite well for me.

I toyed with the idea of trying to get a piece of plastic that I could use for a physical board and that I could roll up and carry with me. But I’m guessing that the person in seat 21A (who is probably still a bit irked about losing the battle for the armrest) is not going to take kindly to me unrolling my big Kanban board to work on it mid flight.

The Horror, The Horror


I did attempt to use my Kanban journal. This is the book I make notes in each week on how things are going. I carry it with me each time I go on the road, so it seems like a great fit. Exiting Kanban-for -1, I re-created all my post its and created a PK Board in my notebook that was just like the one on my wall. It worked great until I actually placed the post-its in the book. I was right back to the Kanban-for-1 issue. Drowning in a bunch of stuff I could not really see clearly. Just like with Kanban-for-1, if I had to move a task, first I had to dig through the piles of tasks to figure out where it was.

Disclaimer: I should point out that if you are reading this hoping to get to a point where I realize I’m just carrying way too many tasks… you might want to get a sandwich… it’s gonna be a while.
 
I decided to take a look at the Personal Kanban apps again. My requirements were the same:

  1. Must be available on laptop, iPhone and iPad.
  2. Must be as close to my physical board as possible (meaning must allow for swim lanes).
  3. Must have some capacity for dealing with recurring tasks.
  4. Must be available online and offline with a sync capability or something as easy as capturing notes on a post it or index card.

Basically I’m looking for Things, but Kanban style (cough cough Cultured Code cough cough).
Since I’ve started writing this blog people have been kind enough to send in a number of recommendations. Trello seems to be very popular. I’ve also received suggestions that I use Evernote for Kanban. I’d love to be able to do that, but I’ve not yet found a tool that would allow me to do so in as effortless a manner as I am looking for. Basically, if using the tool is more work than pulling an index card or a post it out of my pocket and capturing the item/updating the item while I am in an elevator, walking down the street, or sitting on a plane, it’s too much work.

Unfortunately, none of the tools I was able to find met all my requirements. However, after looking over the options, I decided o give Leankit a try. My reasons for choosing it were not entirely scientific, but I’m human…

Leankit allowed me to do the following:
  1. Set up my swim lanes just like I had them on the wall.
  2. Define the work state columns however I wanted.
  3. Establish whatever WIP limits I wanted and warn me when I tried to exceed them.
  4. It let me color code the cards based on work type.

The last point may seem trivial, but to me, it is very significant and one of the primary reasons that I have so much trouble with personal Kanban applications. The value of my physical board is that I can put everything I had to do up there at once. I can look at it all at once. It is a really big information radiator. For me, it’s a billboard telling me what is going on with the things I feel I need to do. No matter how awesome the software is, or how big my monitor is, there doesn’t seem to be a way to replicate the big thing on the wall + tactile interaction thing.

While my preference for a physical board is clearly established, there is no way that my physical board and my Martin travel guitar are going to fit in the overhead, so I need me some app-age.
 

"Never get out of the boat... Unless you were goin all the way."
(Capt. Willard)

Leankit


I used Leankit for about a month during this project. As far as Personal Kanban apps go, it is my weapon of choice. I’ve not tested out the paid version, which includes some extra features and more detailed analytics, but I found the free version to be very helpful in tracking my work on the road. My favorite aspect of the application was the customization. I really liked that I could set up my board in Leankit to mirror the one I have at home. In practicing any work habit, I believe the first step should always be the physical practice. If it moves to an electronic tool, then it is important to select a tool that allows you to mirror your physical behavior. Leankit offered me the most freedom there.

It even allowed me to set up multiple backlogs so that I could mirror how Things had worked for me. While I wasn’t able to figure out how to get recurring tasks going, I was able to create a ReUsable backlog so that each night I could move the recurring Daily items back into that backlog if I wanted. I didn’t actually end up doing that, but it somehow eased my mind to know that I could.

It also allows you to set due dates, mark work as blocked and it has an icon system for type of work.


So, Leankit allowed me to replicate my physical board on the web. It also has an iPhone application which took a little time to get the hang of, but which allowed me to update items as long as I could get online. With respect to my requirements:
 

  1. Must be available on laptop, iPhone and iPad (PASS)
  2. Must be as close to my physical board as possible (meaning must allow for swim lanes) (PASS)
  3. Must have some capacity for dealing with recurring tasks (FAIL)
  4. Must be available online and offline with a sync capability or something as easy as capturing notes on a post it or index card (FAIL)

From a mobility standpoint, with the exception of offline sync, the tool works quite well. It allows me to access my work, update it, enter new items, etc. You can even set it up to allow you to access multiple accounts. On my iPhone I have Leankit set up to access my personal account under one email address and another one I use for Scrum Alliance volunteer work.

The fact that Leankit did not meet all my requirements is not significant for me. None of the applications I looked at were able to meet all of them. From a customization, portability and usability standpoint, I am a big fan of Leankit.

You can't go out into space with fractions.
Initially I had planned to keep testing different applications. What I discovered after a few weeks was that while I want to the portability, the loss of big information radiator-ness was crippling. This was something I decided needed further research, but not so much in the way of testing additional apps. What I felt I needed a better handle on was why I wanted the apps and what I was actually doing with them. I do expect to go back and test out some additional apps – I really want to take a look at Trello because a lot of people have mentioned to me that they use it. But, after a few weeks with Leankit I decided to bail on trying new software for a while because it was time to start working with a Personal Kanban coach. Coverage of that will begin in the next blog post.
Posted on: May 14, 2013 12:57 PM | Permalink | Comments (2)

Personal Kanban Week 9

linkedin twitter facebook Request to reuse this  

 

Productivity Hangover

Ten minutes ago I was supposed to be writing this blog post. What I was doing instead was cleaning out the articles I have stored in Instapaper that have been in the queue for so long that they are no longer worth reading. This seemed really important at the time. And, I was actually-really supposed to be writing this blog post 30 minutes ago. But 30 minutes ago I was doing the stuff I meant to do 2 hours ago. And that is because 2 hours ago, I was still asleep because I stayed up until 3 AM trying to finish the things I had planned for the yesterday. This morning is all about the productivity hangover.

Yesterday, like most days, I planned too much into the day. There was no realistic way I’d be able to get it done given the fact that time is not quite as flexible as I’d like it to be and that I don’t have one of those boxes from Primer.

When a problem comes along... 

In working through this Personal Kanban project there is a question thing that has remained kind of an open issue for me the entire time. What about WIP? If you aren’t familiar with it, WIP stands for Work in Progress. In Kanban, the goal is to limit your work in progress in order to help maximize your throughput. Or, to put it more simply, you need to understand how much you can do at once before you start mucking things up. Once you understand that, you need to prevent yourself from taking on too much at once (and mucking things up). This also helps you understand how long it takes to get items through the system.

For the most part, the practitioners of Personal Kanban that I have spoken with have admitted that WIP is not something they pay much attention to. In speaking with them I did not dig too deeply on that topic at the time because it seemed to be non-critical. I was looking at WIP as a holdover from a more traditional approach to Kanban that had less relevance in Personal Kanban. Also, whether or not it is right or wrong, the items on my board are not sized in any way. Everything is the same, whether it is a writing a new Statement of Work, doing a load of laundry, finishing Clive Davis’s biography, or going through the legal steps of closing down a company. It is all just stuff I am trying to prioritize and do.

If you can dodge a wrench…

A few weeks ago I started working with an Agile Coach who was willing to take on the role of being my Personal Kanban Coach/Sherpa/Confessor. I am very fortunate that he was willing to take this on. The guy is brilliant and I have mad respect for him. I also can’t help but feel a bit bad for the guy. As far as being a coachee goes, I’m definitely having much with the room for optimization.

When I told him I told him I wasn’t really tracking my WIP I am pretty sure I heard him fall off his chair. The productivity guilt monster reared up and shamed me… so I recanted. I explained that I was tracking WIP …-ish. Which meant I had listed a number for WIP at the top of each of my columns and then I just wildly ignored that whenever the hell it seemed convenient…. Which was/is most of the time.

Putting the “fun” back in dysfunction

Shockingly, there are days when I can’t get everything done. Many times the reason is that I have other activities scheduled during time I would otherwise be working. I feel safe in the assumption that I am not alone in this. And yet for many of us, we somehow manage a level of delusion that permits us to plan to do work during the time we know we will be otherwise engaged. When this happens, we have these items, which we unrealistically planned, which cannot be completed on the schedule we put together. I have a master’s degree in project management and I’m deep with the Agile. I know how I am supposed to do this. I also know that how I am doing this is not healthy. I know it is not realistic. And yet it happens, over and over. I’m slowly becoming even more aware of how sharply fundamental an issue this is and how deeply and negatively it impacts my productivity. Because I do not have a clear and present awareness of my capacity and how to plan for that without exceeding it, I am always overfilling my bucket.  When I am teaching people in a work setting about how to keep from doing this, it’s easy to explain. I even have a calculator I’ve made for folks to use to help prevent them from overcommitting themselves each Sprint. But on an individual level am I really supposed to size every single thing I do and plan for doing just that and no more? That’s just not realistic.

And suddenly, just like that, I’m one of “those” students. The ones who like the ideas behind Agile, but who really need to spend some time at the Wall of Won’t.

(The teacher in me would now like to take the student in me out back now for a quick kneecapping… just for good measure.)

Sadly, I do not have a card for that on my board.

I hate when that happens.

Sherman! Time for a new Experiment!

I believe that understanding my capacity at a daily level, and planning to meet, but not exceed that capacity will allow me to complete more work each day. I believe that getting more items to a done state each day, and not leaving a lot of unfinished work on the board will have a positive impact on my ability to get work done that will further improve my productivity. I also believe that if I do not plan to do more than is possible in a day I will be better enabled to get the rest I need to be as productive as possible in future day. This is all common sense. It’s been proven over and over. We all have that voice in our heads telling us that we are special, that we can do more, that we are not bound by the normal laws of time and physics.

Yeah… not so much.

To experiment with this I am going to run two tests. First, I’m going to try the easy one … estimating ideal time for the items in my list and then also estimate my capacity. It will involve some overhead because I am going to have to do this every day, but I will try it for a week to see what happens.

The second part, which will be more challenging for me will be to try breaking my work up into pieces that are small enough to track progress on a daily basis. I’m going to run this for two weeks and then report on it.

Next week I’ll be back to the topic of software for Personal Kanban.

Posted on: April 30, 2013 11:53 AM | Permalink | Comments (1)
ADVERTISEMENTS

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsors