How to talk Ethics with our teams
From the Ethics Bistro Blog
by Tara Leparulo,
Shenila Shahabuddin, Juan Posada Toro, Yannick Arekion, Albert Agbemenu, Kannan Ganesan, Ming Yeung, Laszlo J. Kremmer MBA, CSPO®, CSM®, PMP®, Stelian ROMAN, Witold Hendrysiak
We all tackle ethical dilemmas. Wrong decisions can break careers. Which are the key challenges faced? What are some likely solutions? Where can we find effective tools? Who can apply these and why? Dry, theoretical discussions don't help. Join us for lively, light conversations to learn, share and grow!
View Posts By:
Tara Leparulo
Shenila Shahabuddin
Juan Posada Toro
Yannick Arekion
Albert Agbemenu
Kannan Ganesan
Ming Yeung
Laszlo J. Kremmer MBA, CSPO®, CSM®, PMP®
Stelian ROMAN
Witold Hendrysiak
Past Contributors:
Dr. Deepa Bhide
Lily Murariu
Alankar Karpe
Bryan Shelby
Amany Nuseibeh
Mohamed Hassan
Fabio Rigamonti
Simona Bonghez
John Watson
Lissa Muncer
Valerie Denney
Majeed Hosseiney
Gretta Kelzi
Enrique Cappella
Rocio Briceno
Karthik Ramamurthy
Recent Posts
Behind closed doors: When decisions feel already made
Looking for the most important information on pmi.org? Here are the key links.
Navigating AI in Project Management: A Comparison with Racing Co-Pilots and Driverless Cars
Values and Ethics in Fintech: A 2026 Reflection on Integrity, Accountability, and Ethical Vigilance
Cultural Shift: Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, and Project Practice
Categories
Aerospace and Defense,
Agile,
AI,
Ambassadors,
Artificial Intelligence,
Ask the Experts,
Behavior,
bottom line,
Business Acumen,
Business Ethics,
Business Ethics,
CEO,
CFO,
Change Management,
Chapters,
CIO,
code of conduct,
code of ethics,
Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct,
communication,
Conflict,
Construction,
courage honesty responsibility respect fairness,
Cultural Diversity,
Culture,
CxO,
Decision Making,
Decision-making,
Decision-making,
Digital Project Management,
Digital Transformation,
Diversity,
Do the right thing,
dugutalization project manager professionalism social media,
economy,
EDMF,
EMAG,
empathy,
Ethical Dilemma,
Ethical Leadership,
Ethics,
Ethics,
Ethics,
Ethics,
Ethics,
Ethics,
Ethics,
Ethics as a competence,
Ethics Bistro,
Ethics in Communication,
Ethics Insight Team,
Fairness,
fairness,
Governance,
Honesty,
honesty,
Human,
Information Technology,
Leadership,
Legal Project Management,
Legilsation,
Lessons Learned,
Negotiation,
Nexus,
Organizational Culture,
Organizational Project Management,
PMI Program Management,
PMI Talent Triangle,
PMIAA,
Portfolio Management,
Power Skills,
practitioner,
Product Management,
Professional Conduct,
professional conduct,
Professional Responsibility,
Professionalization,
professonal conduct,
Program Management,
Project,
Project Management,
project manager,
Regulatory,
research,
Respect,
respect,
Responsibility,
responsibility,
Risk Management,
Stakeholder Management,
Strategy,
Sustainability,
Team Assessment,
Teams,
Thought leadership,
tools,
Trust,
trust,
Values,
Values,
values,
Virtual Experience Series,
volunteers,
Ways of Working
Date
When I recommend ethics related discussions, I often hear the comment: “Why should we bring up this topic? People understand ethics, they know what the requirements are, they do not need such reminders”. I usually read under lines “let’s not bore them with something like this”. Nevertheless, these discussions have a purpose and a tangible result. In order to prove this, let me challenge you with a question I’ve found in Dan Ariely’s Irrational Game. He describes an experiment in which the researchers asked the participants to list ten books they read in high school and others to list the Ten Commandments (to the best of their memory). Afterward, the participants were asked to perform a simple math problem, being paid based on their number of correct answers. The trick here was that participants self-reported the number of questions they answered correctly, meaning that they could lie about their scores and get more money. And now comes the question:
How did writing down the Ten Commandments instead of writing down ten books from high school affect people’s cheating habits?
What do you think: did the participants who first wrote down the Ten Commandments cheat more, less or to the same degree?

Dan Ariely disclose the results of the experiment: those participants who were asked to write down the Ten Commandments cheated less. Kind of interesting, don’t you think? The simple refresher of the values we were thought (probably) during childhood makes us more willing to respect them. Or, as the researchers state: “When we are exposed to external triggers that remind us of the importance of honesty, we became more aware of our own morality. As a result, we act more in line with how we would like to behave.” (Mazar, Amir, Ariely, 2008).
And what is the relevance of this experiment to us, project managers, you might (rightfully) ask: well, we are responsible for creating and maintaining an environment in which the values we believe in as project managers (Responsibility, Respect, Honesty and Fairness, the four values listed in our Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct) are respected. As project managers, we are responsible to set and agree on the norms that are expected to be followed by our team members. I know many colleagues who are doing this (some of them by developing those norms with their teams, others by referring to the company’s rules and regulations that should be accepted). But I don’t know anyone who – in the whirl of the project – takes the time to remind those things to their team. I’m sure that you know already that simply asking them to read the norms is far from being enough. They won’t, humans we are! So what can we do? As we have seen that even just a reminder can help. Can we have an interesting discussion with our team regarding ethics? The answer is simple: yes, we can! as we have a great tool. One that relies on the team’s answers (the beauty here is that they cannot argue against their own statements). The tool: Project Team Ethics Assessment is available to all of us (please download it from the PMI website: www.shorturl.at/bprAT) and it comes with detailed, step by step instruction on how to use it, how to facilitate the discussion and how to develop a plan to proactively address the team’s challenges.
Project teams are frequently confronted with potential ethical issues. Especially in today’s challenging times when we must cope with remote work, changing composition of teams, uncertainty regarding availability of resources, pressure of high expectations, and often blurred boundaries between the organization’s and the project’s authority. Let’s support our team members and create an environment where ethical issues are openly discussed and stopped to become an additional burden. Maybe people won’t speak up, but how can you argue with their anonymous feedback addressing what no one will talk about unless you have identified the need and created the environment where you can respectfully, honestly and candidly have those discussions. Give a chance to this tool: www.shorturl.at/bprAT.
Mazar, N., Amir, O., & Ariely, D. (2008). The dishonesty of honest people: A theory of self-concept maintenance. Journal of marketing research, 45(6), 533-644.
Posted
by
Simona Bonghez
on: October 18, 2020 03:21 PM |
Permalink
Comments (8)
Please login or join to subscribe to this item
Kwiyuh Michael Wepngong
Community Champion
Financial Management Specialist | US Peace Corps
Yaounde, Centre, Cameroon
Hi Simon,
Project teams are frequently confronted with potential ethical issues. Especially in today’s challenging times when we must cope with remote work, changing composition of teams, uncertainty regarding availability of resources, pressure of high expectations, and often blurred boundaries between the organization’s and the project’s authority
Alankar Karpe
Project and program management, Speaker and mentor | Wipro
Bangalore, India
Thanks for sharing and reminding that as project managers, we are responsible to set the norms that are expected to be followed by our team members
Thanks for sharing, Simona!
It's great that we have a tool to start from. Ethics can be very subjective since it is influenced by culture, education, and so many other factors. In a team environment, achieving the common goal becomes easier when team members are aware and adhere to the same values. So talking about ethics and what is considered as (un)acceptable behavior in the team is of utmost importance. :)
Simona Bonghez
Managing Partner| Colors in Projects ltd
Bucharest, Romania
I would like to know what do you think about the tool (Team Ethics Assessment). At a first sight, would you be interested to apply it with your teams, do you think it can lead to valuable results? Thank You
Thanks for sharing., very interesting.
Abrachan Pudussery
Project Management Domain expert| Wrench Solutions
Kochi, Kerala, India
Always preach Ethics but use words only when required. This is to the management.
Amany Nuseibeh
Speaker, Global Leader | Optimal Consulting
Sydney, Nsw, Australia
Thank you Simona for this ethical reminder in the most practical way! What a great approach to remind us that talking about ethics, re-enforcing the values would and using the tools would give us better opportunities as individuals, teams and communities!
Angie Lehmann
Project Manager| NDIT
Detroit Lakes, Mn, United States
I enjoyed reading your blog. I believe people are good. They want to do good for themselves and their society. For me, I believe that individuals need to know their own value system first and foremost (who do you want to be/what image of yourself do you want to be known for) and regardless of what choices one makes, it should not go against ones values. Individuals have to be strong against whatever temptations come their way that may go against their own value system. Know who you are and be true to yourself.
"Knowing yourself is the beginning of all wisdom" ~ Aristotle
If you know your values and stay true to them it will be easier to avoid snares.
Please Login/Register to leave a comment.
|
"Either he's dead or my watch has stopped."
- Groucho Marx
|