PHASE 4 – THE EMERGENCE
From the Support to Develop Blog
by Luis Branco
This blog addresses management-related topics and has three areas of focus: 1. Technical skills; 2. Competencies in the field of interpersonal relations and communication (including personal organization and delegation, leadership, teamwork, conflict resolution, conducting meetings, and negotiation); and 3. Strategy (including diagnosis, strategic guidelines, and implementation).4.Technology
Recent Posts
PHASE 4 – THE EMERGENCE
When Structural Drift Becomes Consequential
Implementation Is Not Realization
The Human Burden of Integrative Work
The Cost of Deferred Integration
Categories
Agile,
Career Development,
Career Development,
Career Development,
Career Development,
Career Development,
Career Development,
Career Development,
Career Development,
Career Development,
Career Development,
Career Development,
Career Development,
Career Development,
Career Development,
Career Development,
Career Development,
Career Development,
Career Development,
Career Development,
Career Development,
Career Development,
Career Development,
Career Development,
Career Development,
Career Development,
Career Development,
Career Development,
Career Development,
Career Development,
Career Development,
Career Development,
Career Development,
Career Development,
Career Development,
Career Development,
Career Development,
Career Development,
Career Development,
Career Development,
Career Development,
Career Development,
Career Development,
Career Development,
Career Development,
Career Development,
Career Development,
Career Development,
Career Development,
Career Development,
Career Development,
Career Development,
Career Development,
Career Development,
Career Development,
Career Development,
Career Development,
Career Development,
Career Development,
Career Development,
Career Development,
Career Development,
Career Development,
Career Development,
Career Development,
Career Development,
Career Development,
Career Development,
Career Development,
Career Development,
Career Development,
Career Development,
Career Development,
Career Development,
Career Development,
Career Development,
Career Development,
Career Development,
Career Development,
Career Development,
Career Development,
Career Development,
Career Development,
Career Development,
Career Development,
Career Development,
Career Development,
Career Development,
Career Development,
Career Development,
Career Development,
Career Development,
Career Development,
Career Development,
Career Development,
Career Development,
Career Development,
Career Development,
Career Development,
Career Development,
Career Development,
Career Development,
Career Development,
Career Development,
Career Development,
Career Development,
Career Development,
Career Development,
Career Development,
Career Development,
Career Development,
Career Development,
Career Development,
Career Development,
Career Development,
Career Development,
Career Development,
Career Development,
Career Development,
Career Development,
Career Development,
Career Development,
Career Development,
Education,
Governance,
Governance,
Governance,
Governance,
Governance,
Governance,
Governance,
Governance,
Governance,
Governance,
Governance,
Governance,
Governance,
Governance,
Governance,
Governance,
Governance,
Governance,
In,
Integration Management,
Interpersonal Skills,
Interpersonal Skills,
Interpersonal Skills,
Interpersonal Skills,
Interpersonal Skills,
Interpersonal Skills,
Interpersonal Skills,
Interpersonal Skills,
Interpersonal Skills,
Interpersonal Skills,
Interpersonal Skills,
Interpersonal Skills,
Interpersonal Skills,
Interpersonal Skills,
Interpersonal Skills,
Interpersonal Skills,
Interpersonal Skills,
Interpersonal Skills,
Interpersonal Skills,
Interpersonal Skills,
Interpersonal Skills,
Interpersonal Skills,
Interpersonal Skills,
Interpersonal Skills,
Interpersonal Skills,
Interpersonal Skills,
Interpersonal Skills,
Interpersonal Skills,
Interpersonal Skills,
Interpersonal Skills,
Interpersonal Skills,
Interpersonal Skills,
Interpersonal Skills,
Interpersonal Skills,
Interpersonal Skills,
Interpersonal Skills,
Interpersonal Skills,
Interpersonal Skills,
Interpersonal Skills,
Interpersonal Skills,
Interpersonal Skills,
Interpersonal Skills,
Interpersonal Skills,
Interpersonal Skills,
Interpersonal Skills,
Interpersonal Skills,
Interpersonal Skills,
Interpersonal Skills,
Interpersonal Skills,
Interpersonal Skills,
Interpersonal Skills,
Interpersonal Skills,
Interpersonal Skills,
Interpersonal Skills,
Interpersonal Skills,
Interpersonal Skills,
Interpersonal Skills,
Interpersonal Skills,
Interpersonal Skills,
Interpersonal Skills,
Interpersonal Skills,
Interpersonal Skills,
Interpersonal Skills,
Interpersonal Skills,
Interpersonal Skills,
Interpersonal Skills,
Interpersonal Skills,
Interpersonal Skills,
Interpersonal Skills,
Interpersonal Skills,
Interpersonal Skills,
Interpersonal Skills,
Interpersonal Skills,
Interpersonal Skills,
Interpersonal Skills,
Interpersonal Skills,
Interpersonal Skills,
Interpersonal Skills,
Interpersonal Skills,
Interpersonal Skills,
Interpersonal Skills,
Interpersonal Skills,
Interpersonal Skills,
Interpersonal Skills,
Interpersonal Skills,
Interpersonal Skills,
Interpersonal Skills,
Interpersonal Skills,
Interpersonal Skills,
Interpersonal Skills,
Interpersonal Skills,
Interpersonal Skills,
Interpersonal Skills,
Interpersonal Skills,
Interpersonal Skills,
Interpersonal Skills,
Interpersonal Skills,
Interpersonal Skills,
Interpersonal Skills,
Interpersonal Skills,
Interpersonal Skills,
Interpersonal Skills,
Interpersonal Skills,
Interpersonal Skills,
Interpersonal Skills,
Interpersonal Skills,
Interpersonal Skills,
Interpersonal Skills,
Interpersonal Skills,
Interpersonal Skills,
Interpersonal Skills,
Interpersonal Skills,
Interpersonal Skills,
Interpersonal Skills,
Interpersonal Skills,
Interpersonal Skills,
Interpersonal Skills,
Interpersonal Skills,
Interpersonal Skills,
Interpersonal Skills,
Interpersonal Skills,
Interpersonal Skills,
Knowledge Management,
le,
lea,
Leadership,
Leadership,
Leadership,
Leadership,
Leadership,
Leadership,
Leadership,
Leadership,
Leadership,
Leadership,
Leadership,
Leadership,
Leadership,
Leadership,
Leadership,
Leadership,
Leadership,
Leadership,
Leadership,
Leadership,
Leadership,
Leadership,
Leadership,
Leadership,
Leadership,
Leadership,
Leadership,
Leadership,
Leadership,
Leadership,
Leadership,
Leadership,
Leadership,
Leadership,
Leadership,
Leadership,
Leadership,
Leadership,
Leadership,
Leadership,
Leadership,
Leadership,
Leadership,
Leadership,
Leadership,
Leadership,
Leadership,
Leadership,
Leadership,
Leadership,
Leadership,
Leadership,
Leadership,
Leadership,
Leadership,
Leadership,
Leadership,
Leadership,
Leadership,
Leadership,
Leadership,
Leadership,
Leadership,
Leadership,
Leadership,
Leadership,
Leadership,
Leadership,
Leadership,
Leadership,
Leadership,
Leadership,
Leadership,
Leadership,
Leadership,
Leadership,
Leadership,
Leadership,
Leadership,
Leadership,
Leadership,
Leadership,
Leadership,
Leadership,
Leadership,
Leadership,
Leadership,
Leadership,
Leadership,
Leadership,
Leadership,
Leadership,
Leadership,
Leadership,
Leadership,
Leadership,
Leadership,
Leadership,
Leadership,
Leadership,
Leadership,
Leadership,
Leadership,
Leadership,
Leadership,
Leadership,
Leadership,
Leadership,
Leadership,
Leadership,
Leadership,
Leadership,
Leadership,
Leadership,
Leadership,
Leadership,
Leadership,
Leadership,
Leadership,
Leadership,
Leadership,
Leadership,
Leadership,
or,
Organizational Project Management,
Portfolio Management,
Program,
Program Management,
Strategy,
Strategy,
Strategy,
Strategy,
Strategy,
Strategy,
Strategy,
Strategy,
Strategy,
Strategy,
Strategy,
Strategy,
Strategy,
Strategy,
Strategy,
Strategy,
Strategy,
Strategy,
Strategy,
Strategy,
Strategy,
Strategy,
Strategy,
Strategy,
Strategy,
Strategy,
Strategy,
Strategy,
Strategy,
Strategy,
Strategy,
Strategy,
Strategy,
Strategy,
Strategy,
Strategy,
Strategy,
Strategy,
Strategy,
Strategy,
Strategy,
Strategy,
Strategy,
Strategy,
Strategy,
Strategy,
Strategy,
Strategy,
Strategy,
Strategy,
Strategy,
Strategy,
Strategy,
Strategy,
Strategy,
Strategy,
Strategy,
Strategy,
Strategy,
Strategy,
Strategy,
Strategy,
Strategy,
Strategy,
Strategy,
Strategy,
Strategy,
Strategy,
Strategy,
Strategy,
Strategy,
Strategy,
Strategy,
Strategy,
Strategy,
Strategy,
Strategy,
Strategy,
Strategy,
Strategy,
Strategy,
Strategy,
Strategy,
Strategy,
Strategy,
Strategy,
Strategy,
Strategy,
Strategy,
Strategy,
Strategy,
Strategy,
Strategy,
Strategy,
Strategy,
Strategy,
Strategy,
Strategy,
Strategy,
Strategy,
Strategy,
Strategy,
Strategy,
Strategy,
Strategy,
Strategy,
Strategy,
Strategy,
Strategy,
Strategy,
Strategy,
Strategy,
Strategy,
Strategy,
Strategy,
Strategy,
Strategy,
Strategy,
Strategy,
Strategy,
Strategy,
Strategy,
Strategy,
Sustainability,
Talent Management,
Talent Management,
Talent Management,
Talent Management,
Talent Management,
Talent Management,
Talent Management,
Talent Management,
Talent Management,
Talent Management,
Talent Management,
Talent Management,
Talent Management,
Talent Management,
Talent Management,
Talent Management,
Talent Management,
Talent Management,
Talent Management,
Talent Management,
Talent Management,
Talent Management,
Talent Management,
Talent Management,
Talent Management,
Talent Management,
Talent Management,
Talent Management,
Talent Management,
Talent Management,
Talent Management,
Talent Management,
Talent Management,
Talent Management,
Talent Management,
Talent Management,
Talent Management,
Talent Management,
Talent Management,
Talent Management,
Talent Management,
Talent Management,
Talent Management,
Talent Management,
Talent Management,
Talent Management,
Talent Management,
Talent Management,
Talent Management,
Talent Management,
Talent Management,
Talent Management,
Talent Management,
Talent Management,
Talent Management,
Talent Management,
Talent Management,
Talent Management,
Talent Management,
Talent Management,
Talent Management,
Talent Management,
Talent Management,
Talent Management,
Talent Management,
Talent Management,
Talent Management,
Talent Management,
Talent Management,
Talent Management,
Talent Management,
Talent Management,
Talent Management,
Talent Management,
Talent Management,
Talent Management,
Talent Management,
Talent Management,
Talent Management,
Talent Management,
Talent Management,
Talent Management,
Talent Management,
Talent Management,
Talent Management,
Talent Management,
Talent Management,
Talent Management,
Talent Management,
Talent Management,
Talent Management,
Talent Management,
Talent Management,
Talent Management,
Talent Management,
Talent Management,
Talent Management,
Talent Management,
Talent Management,
Talent Management,
Talent Management,
Talent Management,
Talent Management,
Talent Management,
Talent Management,
Talent Management,
Talent Management,
Talent Management,
Talent Management,
Talent Management,
Talent Management,
Talent Management,
Talent Management,
Talent Management,
Talent Management,
Talent Management,
Talent Management,
Talent Management,
Talent Management,
Talent Management,
Talent Management,
Talent Management,
Talent Management
Date
Opening NoteTHE AWAKENING began with two related questions about the future of the profession and the architecture of project management.
The first three phases did not simply confirm the propositions behind those questions.
They investigated them.
And that investigation changed what can legitimately be claimed.
A function does not necessarily require a particular role.
The redistribution of responsibility does not, by itself, establish the disappearance or devaluation of professional contribution.
PMBOK 8 recognizes integration. The question is therefore not whether integration has been forgotten, nor whether every project requires one universal integrator. The more demanding question is how integrative responsibility is configured when leadership, authority and management responsibilities are distributed, whether that responsibility is adequately enabled, and how it is actually exercised.
THE EMERGENCE takes the investigation forward from those findings without losing sight of the questions that gave rise to the series.
If no single role can be assumed to own the whole, what must the project system still be capable of doing?
This phase does not begin by asking what the future Project Manager, Project Professional or Project Leader should become. Nor does it begin with a predefined model of leadership or a list of competencies inherited from existing roles.
Its epistemic function is requirement discovery.
The purpose is to identify the functions, capabilities and architectural conditions required to preserve coherence, adaptation, legitimate accountability and value across distributed project systems.
That changes the question.
Earlier phases established that a necessary function does not necessarily require a particular role, that capabilities and responsibilities can be configured across different actors and mechanisms, and that formal presence does not by itself establish effective system-level capacity.
THE EMERGENCE begins from those distinctions rather than reopening them.
It asks which requirements persist.
A role may disappear while a function remains necessary. A mechanism may change while the underlying requirement remains. But the reverse must also remain possible: some functions inherited from previous organizational architectures may prove unnecessary when the conditions that once made them necessary no longer exist.
The existence of a function must therefore not be inferred from the historical existence of a role. But neither should the disappearance of a role be treated as evidence that the function has disappeared.
No prior list of functions is treated as canonical.
Existing concepts and leadership architectures form part of the intellectual context of this research, but they do not determine what this phase must find. A candidate function must survive because the project system requires what that function accomplishes, not because it corresponds to an existing role, competency model or leadership framework.
This requirement-discovery process is also necessary to return rigorously to the two questions from which THE AWAKENING began.
For the professional question, it is not enough to observe that responsibilities historically associated with the Project Manager have been redistributed. We must first establish which functions and capabilities remain necessary, whether and how they are being realized elsewhere in the project system, and what their redistribution ultimately means for the distinctive professional contribution of the Project Manager.
For the architectural question, it is not enough to establish that integration is recognized or that governance mechanisms exist. We must determine what functions, capabilities and conditions are actually required for integration to remain effective when authority, knowledge, decision-making and management responsibilities are distributed, and whether different configurations can satisfy those requirements.
Neither inquiry predetermines its answer.
The investigation may ultimately strengthen, qualify or contradict the propositions that gave rise to either question.
For the same reason, this phase postpones the Regenerative Project Leader™ question until the required functions and capabilities have first been identified.
The sequence is deliberate.
Article 16 asks what the project system cannot afford to leave unrealized.
Article 17 investigates what makes those functions effective at system level rather than merely present somewhere within the system.
Article 18 examines which elements can be performed, supported or delegated technologically and which, if any, require human judgment, legitimacy or accountability.
Article 19 investigates which responsibilities, if any, must remain associated with leadership beyond delivery, including purpose, strategic intent, value, stakeholder consequences, sustainability and long-term viability.
Only then does Article 20 ask whether the functions and capabilities identified across the phase converge strongly enough to justify a distinct leadership archetype, or whether they are better understood as a distributed capability architecture.
That question has no predetermined answer.
The investigation may find that essential capabilities can remain distributed across the project system without converging in a distinct leadership archetype.
It may find that some requirements are contingent rather than universal.
It may find that functions historically associated with leadership can be performed through different organizational or technological mechanisms.
Or it may find that apparently distributed requirements repeatedly converge around a coherent configuration of leadership capabilities.
Each of those outcomes must remain possible.
THE EMERGENCE therefore reverses the conventional direction of role design:
Do not begin with the leader and ask what capabilities the role should possess. Begin with the project system and ask what capabilities the system cannot afford to lose.
Only after those requirements have been established can we ask where they should reside, how they should be exercised, how they may be distributed across human and technological actors, and what their distribution ultimately means for leadership, for the professional contribution of the Project Manager, and for the architecture through which project coherence is preserved.
THE EMERGENCE is therefore an investigation into what the future project system must still be able to do, not an attempt to define in advance the competencies of the future Project Manager.
Whether those requirements ultimately converge into a leadership architecture is a question for the investigation, not a premise of it.
And whether the findings ultimately support, qualify or challenge the propositions that gave rise to THE AWAKENING must likewise remain an outcome of the investigation, not an assumption built into it.
Posted on: October 07, 2026 05:05 AM |
Permalink
Comments (0)
Please login or join to subscribe to this item
Please Login/Register to leave a comment.
|
"Next week there can't be any crisis. My schedule is already full."
- Henry Kissinger
|
