Collusion in the Bidding Process—A Breach of PMI’s Ethical Foundations
From the Ethics Bistro Blog
by Tara Leparulo,
Shenila Shahabuddin, Juan Posada Toro, Albert Agbemenu, Ming Yeung, Kannan Ganesan, Yannick Arekion, Witold Hendrysiak, Stelian ROMAN, Laszlo J. Kremmer MBA, CSPO®, CSM®, PMP®
We all tackle ethical dilemmas. Wrong decisions can break careers. Which are the key challenges faced? What are some likely solutions? Where can we find effective tools? Who can apply these and why? Dry, theoretical discussions don't help. Join us for lively, light conversations to learn, share and grow!
View Posts By:
Tara Leparulo
Shenila Shahabuddin
Juan Posada Toro
Albert Agbemenu
Ming Yeung
Kannan Ganesan
Yannick Arekion
Witold Hendrysiak
Stelian ROMAN
Laszlo J. Kremmer MBA, CSPO®, CSM®, PMP®
Past Contributors:
Dr. Deepa Bhide
Lily Murariu
Alankar Karpe
Bryan Shelby
Amany Nuseibeh
Mohamed Hassan
Fabio Rigamonti
Simona Bonghez
John Watson
Lissa Muncer
Valerie Denney
Majeed Hosseiney
Gretta Kelzi
Enrique Cappella
Rocio Briceno
Karthik Ramamurthy
Recent Posts
Behind closed doors: When decisions feel already made
Looking for the most important information on pmi.org? Here are the key links.
Navigating AI in Project Management: A Comparison with Racing Co-Pilots and Driverless Cars
Values and Ethics in Fintech: A 2026 Reflection on Integrity, Accountability, and Ethical Vigilance
Cultural Shift: Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, and Project Practice
Categories
Aerospace and Defense,
Agile,
AI,
Ambassadors,
Artificial Intelligence,
Ask the Experts,
Behavior,
bottom line,
Business Acumen,
Business Ethics,
Business Ethics,
CEO,
CFO,
Change Management,
Chapters,
CIO,
code of conduct,
code of ethics,
Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct,
communication,
Conflict,
Construction,
courage honesty responsibility respect fairness,
Cultural Diversity,
Culture,
CxO,
Decision Making,
Decision-making,
Decision-making,
Digital Project Management,
Digital Transformation,
Diversity,
Do the right thing,
dugutalization project manager professionalism social media,
economy,
EDMF,
EMAG,
empathy,
Ethical Dilemma,
Ethical Leadership,
Ethics,
Ethics,
Ethics,
Ethics,
Ethics,
Ethics,
Ethics,
Ethics as a competence,
Ethics Bistro,
Ethics in Communication,
Ethics Insight Team,
Fairness,
fairness,
Governance,
Honesty,
honesty,
Human,
Information Technology,
Leadership,
Legal Project Management,
Legilsation,
Lessons Learned,
Negotiation,
Nexus,
Organizational Culture,
Organizational Project Management,
PMI Program Management,
PMI Talent Triangle,
PMIAA,
Portfolio Management,
Power Skills,
practitioner,
Product Management,
Professional Conduct,
professional conduct,
Professional Responsibility,
Professionalization,
professonal conduct,
Program Management,
Project,
Project Management,
project manager,
Regulatory,
research,
Respect,
respect,
Responsibility,
responsibility,
Risk Management,
Stakeholder Management,
Strategy,
Sustainability,
Team Assessment,
Teams,
Thought leadership,
tools,
Trust,
trust,
Values,
Values,
values,
Virtual Experience Series,
volunteers,
Ways of Working
Date
Categories:
Business Ethics,
Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct,
Ethical Dilemma,
Ethical Leadership,
Ethics Bistro,
Ethics Insight Team,
Fairness,
Honesty,
Lessons Learned,
Professional Conduct,
Program Management,
Project Management,
Respect,
Responsibility
Collusion in the Bidding Process—A Breach of PMI’s Ethical Foundations
Source credit: istockphoto.com
In a recent workplace incident, Pamela, a project team member, conspired with Donald, a representative of an external vendor, to submit a bid with padded estimates. Their intent was to defraud the firm overseeing the procurement process by inflating costs and securing unjust financial gain. This act of collusion is not only unethical; it is a direct contravention and blatant violation of the PMI Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct, which is built upon four foundational values: responsibility, respect, fairness, and honesty.
🔹 Responsibility
Responsibility requires project professionals to own their decisions and uphold the integrity of their roles. Donald’s participation in the fraudulent scheme demonstrates a clear abdication of this duty. Instead of acting in the best interest of the organization and the project, he prioritized personal or external interests. By enabling inflated estimates, he compromised the financial stewardship expected of project professionals and failed to report unethical behavior—a core tenet of responsible conduct.
🔹 Respect
Respect in project management means honoring the dignity and rights of all stakeholders. Pamela’s collusion with Donald disrespected the trust placed in him by his team, leadership, and the broader organization. It undermined the collaborative spirit of the procurement process and devalued the contributions of honest vendors who participated in good faith. Respect also includes fostering an environment where ethical concerns can be raised without fear—something this scenario clearly lacked.
🔹 Fairness
Fairness is the bedrock of any competitive bidding process. It ensures that all vendors have an equal opportunity to win contracts based on merit, quality, and cost-effectiveness. By padding estimates and manipulating the outcome, Pamela and Donald created an uneven playing field. Their actions disadvantaged other vendors, distorted market competition, and potentially led to the selection of a less qualified or overpriced provider. This breach of fairness erodes trust in the procurement system and damages the reputation of the organization.
🔹 Honesty
Honesty is the cornerstone of ethical project management. It demands transparency, truthfulness, and integrity in all communications and decisions. The deliberate inflation of estimates and concealment of collusion are blatant acts of deception. Pamela’s failure to disclose the true nature of the bid and his relationship with Donald violates the expectation that project professionals will act truthfully and avoid conflicts of interest. This dishonesty not only jeopardizes the project’s financial health but also tarnishes the credibility of the individuals involved.
Conclusion: A Serious Ethical Breach
This scenario is a textbook example of unethical behavior that contravenes every principle outlined in PMI’s Code of Ethics. It highlights the dangers of unchecked collusion and the importance of ethical vigilance in project environments. The consequences of such misconduct extend beyond economic loss, such as reputational damage, legal exposure, and / or erosion of stakeholder trust.
Call to Action
It is time for the project management community to take a stand. We must reinforce ethical education, implement robust checks and balances, and cultivate environments where integrity is non-negotiable. Fraudulent behavior like this must be confronted—not with silence, but with decisive action.
Let us recommit to the values that reflect the highest standards of responsibility, respect, fairness, and honesty define our profession. Let us share best practices, strengthen oversight, and recommit to the values that define our profession. Fraudulent behavior must be confronted—not with silence, but with action. Together, we can build a project management culture rooted in integrity.
Questions for the Project Management Community
- How can we strengthen ethical oversight in procurement processes?
- What mechanisms should be in place to detect and deter collusion?
- How do we empower team members to report unethical behavior safely?
- What role should project managers play in fostering a culture of integrity?
References:
Project Management Institute, Inc. (2025). Ethics. pmi.org. https://www.pmi.org/about/ethics
Project Management Institute, Inc. (n.d.). Ethics Guidelines. pmi.org. https://www.pmi.org/about/ethics/guidelines
Project Management Institute, Inc. (n.d.). PMI Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct. pmi.org. https://www.pmi.org/-/media/pmi/documents/public/pdf/ethics/pmi-code-of-ethics.pdf
Posted
by
Ming Yeung
on: August 14, 2025 01:11 AM |
Permalink
Comments (6)
Please login or join to subscribe to this item
Your blog raises an important and often overlooked issue ethical breaches in procurement damage far more than finances. The case of Pamela and Donald clearly violates all four PMI Code of Ethics values. Such actions corrode trust, discourage fair competition, and demotivate ethical team members. I agree with your call for stronger oversight and a culture where integrity is non-negotiable. Ethics-focused vendor onboarding could help set clear expectations from the start. Anonymous reporting channels, with visible follow up, can empower safe whistleblowing. Your emphasis on proactive measures over reactive punishment is commendable. The questions you pose invite meaningful and solutions driven dialogue. Sharing real world prevention examples would strengthen this conversation further.
Thank you for framing this issue so clearly, it’s one the profession must keep addressing.
Ming Yeung
Adjunct Professor & Acting COO/CPO/CRO (contract)| Blockchain Venture Capital Inc.
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Thank you, Shenila, for pointing out how ethical breaches in procurement erode trust and team morale. The Pamela and Donald case is a textbook violation of PMI’s core values. Stronger oversight and ethics-focused onboarding are essential. Anonymous reporting with visible follow-up could truly empower whistleblowers. Thank you for sparking this vital conversation.
A very illustrative and well-developed case. I find it especially valuable how you connect the collusion in the bidding process with PMI’s four core values: responsibility, respect, fairness, and honesty. These kinds of practical examples truly help us reflect on how ethics is not just an abstract concept, but a concrete guide for our daily decisions as project professionals. Thank you for raising questions that invite both action and self-reflection in our practices.
Thank you, Ming, for this thought-provoking case study which unfortunately is a common marketplace in many parts of the world, especially in very poor economies. It is a very big challenge dealing with this in these poor economies and can sometimes even threaten the lives of whistleblowers.
To strengthen ethical oversight in the procurement process, organizations must ensure a very robust procurement system. One that clearly makes conflict-of-interest come at a very dreadful consequence. Also put in place a very solid reward system for whistleblowers. Project Managers must be at the forefront in driving policy and the implementation of robust procurement systems. Project Managers must also have an open-door policy to encourage whistleblowers to report violations without fear or favor.
Together, we shall overcome this very wicked canker.
Ming Yeung
Adjunct Professor & Acting COO/CPO/CRO (contract)| Blockchain Venture Capital Inc.
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Thank you, Lissette, for your thoughtful reflection. I completely agree that connecting real-world scenarios to PMI’s core values makes ethics tangible and actionable. It is through these grounded examples that we strengthen our ethical compass and empower project professionals to lead with integrity, fairness, and accountability in every decision we make.
Ming Yeung
Adjunct Professor & Acting COO/CPO/CRO (contract)| Blockchain Venture Capital Inc.
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Thank you, Albert, for your powerful reflection. I fully concur that ethical leadership in procurement is critical, especially in vulnerable economies. Project managers must champion transparency, enforce accountability, and protect whistleblowers. Your call for robust systems and fearless reporting is essential to dismantling corruption and restoring trust in project environments. Let’s keep pushing forward.
Please Login/Register to leave a comment.
|
"I have not failed. I've just found 10,000 ways that won't work."
- Thomas Edison
|