Categories: Conflict, Ethical Dilemma, Ethical Leadership, Ethics, Ethics, Ethics as a competence, Ethics Bistro, Ethics in Communication, Ethics Insight Team
This past week, I caught up with several former colleagues and friends from different organisations. A recurring theme emerged in our conversations: many of them are grappling with significant challenges, with much of their time and energy consumed in trying to resolve conflicts within their teams. In several cases, these conflicts are escalating and beginning to get out of hand.
By the end of the week, these discussions prompted me to pause and reflect, analysing not only what I had heard, but also how it connects with lessons I’ve learned through teaching, leadership, and practice.

Why Do We End Up in Conflict?
Across these reflections, one root cause stood out: misaligned expectations. When expectations are not met, trust begins to erode. But why are expectations so often out of alignment?
Each person brings their own interpretation of what success will look like working in this team driven mostly by their own sense of purpose. Over time, when those expectations are not met for a variety of reasons. Without the right guardrails in place, signs of disengagement or frustration go unnoticed until conflict surfaces.
How individuals react is strongly influenced by their values and coping mechanisms. For organisations, this can result in good employees quietly leaving disruptive arguments within teams, or prolonged disputes that drain productivity and morale.
Drawing from My Teaching Experience
When teaching the PMI Agile Certified Practitioner (PMI-ACP®) course under Domain IV: Team Performance, one of the models I referenced often was Speed B. Leas’ Model of Conflict. It outlines five escalating levels of conflict from manageable problem solving to entrenched, intractable disputes.
The lesson is simple but powerful: leaders must recognise and address conflict early. In agile environments, where transparency and collaboration are vital, even small misunderstandings can snowball into major disputes if left unchecked.
Another useful framework is the Thomas-Kilmann Conflict Mode Instrument (TKI), which identifies five approaches: competing, collaborating, compromising, avoiding, and accommodating. Effective leaders learn to adapt their approach to context, while prioritising collaboration for long term trust and cohesion. Together, these frameworks reinforce a core truth: effective conflict resolution requires awareness, adaptability, and timing.
Preventing Conflict Before It Escalates
The best approach to conflict is prevention. From my reflections, several practices stand out as essential:
- Shared vision and purpose: A clear “why” which keeps the team aligned.
- Team ground rules: Agreements on how the team will work and communicate serve as guardrails.
- Empathy in action: Recognising that we are all human subject to personal highs and lows helps teams support one another through challenges.
- Regular touchpoints: Leaders must check in frequently to ensure expectations remain clear and trust is intact.
- Open and safe dialogue: Providing space for candid conversations allows issues to surface early, before they escalate.
When these practices are embedded in the way we work, conflict shifts from being destructive to becoming a constructive part of problem solving.
The Role of PMI Ethics
Conflict also brings us back to values and ethics. How we respond under pressure whether we lash out, withdraw, resign quietly, or seek constructive dialogue is guided by both personal values and professional standards.
The PMI Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct provide a compass for leaders and teams alike:
- Responsibility – owning our decisions and their consequences.
- Respect – valuing diverse perspectives and treating others with dignity.
- Fairness – acting impartially, without bias or favouritism.
- Honesty – communicating truthfully and transparently.
Applied consistently, these principles not only help to prevent conflict but also shape how teams respond when disagreements inevitably arise.
When Conflict Becomes Beyond Repair
Despite best efforts, some conflicts move beyond repair. This typically happens when:
- Trust has been repeatedly broken.
- Core values are fundamentally misaligned.
- Hostility escalates into personal
attacks. - Resolution is delayed too long, allowing resentment to harden.
At this stage, leadership often shifts from resolution to containment, restructuring, or separation, to protect the wider team and organisation.
These conversations reinforced my belief that conflict is not a sign of failure it is an inevitable part of human interaction. When addressed constructively, it can become a powerful driver of learning, innovation, and stronger collaboration. The true test of leadership lies in how early we recognise conflict, how openly we create space for resolution, and how firmly we anchor our actions in ethical principles. By leading with responsibility, respect, fairness, and honesty, we can transform conflict into an opportunity for trust and growth ultimately strengthening the very foundations of collaboration and leadership.



