Project Management

People, Planet, Profits & Projects

by ,

About this Blog

RSS

View Posts By:

Richard Maltzman
Dave Shirley

Recent Posts

Saving the Sahel (Part 1)

You Can't Get They-ah From Hee-yah

Floating an idea into reality: the other side of the AI Project Paradox

The Environment of the Built Environment: an AI Paradox

Is plastic on your mind?

Categories

6th, 6th Edfition, 6th Edition PMBOK, 7th Edition, 7th Edition PMBOK, 8th Edition PMBOK, 8th Edition PMBOK Guide, Activism, actuarial, actuary, adapt, addition by subtraction, Africa, africa, agriculture, airforce, ajaita, Alaska, amazon, analogous, analytics, ancient, and more power, antarctica, anti-science, apple, apps, architecture, arctic, arrakis, Artificial Intelligence, asch paradigm, Assistant, asthma, astronomy, automobile, automotive, autonomous cars, b, bankhar, Banksy Crypto, basalt, baseball, bats, batter, beauty products, benefit, benefits, Benefits Realization, beyond epica, biases, bicycle, big data, big dfata, big dig, bike, biodiversity, biomedicine, birdhouse, blockchain, blood, blue blood, blue trees, bluefin, bluefin tuna, book review, boston, boston university, Boyce, Brazil, brazil, Breakdown Structures, BS, building, buildings, built environment, built environment, bumblebee, cake, capacitor, car, Carbon, carbon, carbon capture, carbon negative, carbon neutral, carbon pool, carbon sequestration, carbonate, careers, CEO, ChatGPT, chatGPT, chatgpt, chatgpt, chess, China, china, chopsticks, citrus, cli-fi, climate, climate change, climate resilience, climeworks, Clumsy, CO2, co2, CO2 Utilization, coalition, cobalt, coffee pods, cognition, cognitive, Collabortion, colombia, concrete, Conflict, construction 5.0, cool projects xyloscope, cooling, coral, corn, cost of good quality, cost of poor quality, cost of quality, crazy, criticism of project management, cryptocurrency, CSR, csr, data, data analytics, data privacy, datacenter, dataset, death spiral, Decision Making, decomposition, Defense and Climate, definition of a project, deforestation, dependencies, dependency, desert, DIKW, dikw, dimopoulos, disposal, dna, DOD, dogs, dolphins, dream, drilling, drink, dune, dune, dutch, early start, earth, eatlocal, eco-tourism, ecological, economic, economics, EKC, electric grid, electricity, electronics, elysis, embodied carbon, emerging technologies, empower, Energy, energy efficiency, environmental degradation, escalate, escalation, ESG, extreme weather, fallacy, FARC, farming, finance, fish, fish brains, fishing, fix, fixing the earth, flint water, Flint Water Supply, flood, flooding, Food supply chain, food waste, forest, forest for the trees, forestation, forrestgump, frank herbert, Fruitcake, fungus, fusion, Galvao, garage, gas, gasoline, geese, gender equality, gender partnerships, generational differences, Generative AI, gladwell, gold, Goodness, google, Government, GPT, great pacific garbage patch, green, green building, green buildings, green energy, green iguana, green project, green project management, greening, guest post, gyre, harkonnen, Harvesting Benefits, hawasina, hedgehogs, heursitics, historical data, hlb, holitsic, holland, horseshoe crab, human-caused climate change, hydrogen, hydrology, ice, iceland, ignition, iguana, imagery, impact, india, inequality, information, initiatives, injection, insurance, intelligence, interacting risk, internal combustion engine, invasive species, investment, isomer, issue escalation, issues, ITER, jobs, Jupiter, justification, kids, kill point, knowledge, koch brothers, Kuznets, laboratory, LAL, landscape mode, lapampa, launch, LCA, Leadership, Leadership, life cycle analyses, life cycle analysis, lifecycle, Linkedin, liquid, lizard, local, long term, long-term, long-term thinking, look up, loud, maintenance, maker, makermovement, malcolm gladwell, management, marathon, marine biology, market, mars, Martin Luther King, mean, megawatt, MeHg, melting, mercury, metal, Microgrid, microplastics, migration, military, millennial, mindset, minerals, mission, mitigate, MLK, mongolia, museum, museum of london, nature, nematodes, net gain, Net Project Success Score, net zero, netherlands, network, New book, New Jersey, New Practitioners, new york, NFT, nitrogen, noise, noreaster, norway, nova, NPSS, NREL, ocean, ocean cleanup, ocean life, oil rig, oil rigs, oklahoma, oman, only murders in the building, opportunity, overall risk, oxygen, packaging, pareto, PBS, permafrost, persistence, peru, Pharmaceutical, planet, planet.com, planning, plant, plasma, plastic, playground, pm, pm education, pmbok, pmbok guide, pmnetwork, PMXPO-2018, podcast, pollutants, pollution, poop, poor, portfolio, power, power skills, privacy, privacy concerns, professors, program, Program Management, project, project leader, project leadership, project management, project management 3.0, project on fire, project progress, Project Success, project success, projecticity, projectleadership, projectmanagement, projects, psychology, pulse of the profession, purple bacteria, purpose, quiet, rainforest, rationale, reef, refugees, renewable, renewables, Repair, repair, repeatable process, repeatable processes, repurpose, research, resource breakdown strucuture, Resource Management, reversing climate change, revisionist history, rich, rigs2reefs, ripe, risk, risk avoidance, Risk Management, risk mitigation, risk response, risk responses, river, robots, rocks, rules of thumb, rural, rural India, russia, Sarcasm/Irony, satellite, saudi, schedule, sci-fi, Science, science, science-fiction, scientific american, screaming monkeys, sea, sea life, Sea-Level Rise, sea-level rise, seagreens, seawall, seawater, seawater temperature, seaweed. beat;es. farming, secondary risk, selena gomez, sequestration, shipping, skyscraper, SLR, smart cities, smart city, smelting, social, social pressure, soil, solar, solar panels, solar perovkites, solar saheli, sonic, sponge cities, SRI, stage-gate, stagegate, stakeholder, stakeholder management, steward, stewardship, storage, strategy, stupid, success, suffer, sulphur, sunk cost, supercapacitor, supply chain, survey, Sustainability, sustainability, Sustainable Investing, Sustainable Tourism, sybiosis, symbiosis, system 03, TBL, temperature, terraform, terraforming, test, threat, threats, totem, touchscreen, tour, tower, Trains, transparency, transportation, trash, tree, tree species, trees, trillion, triple bottom line, triple constraint, truth to power, UMass, us army corps of engineers, USDA, vacuum, value, venus, vision, voice, voltage optimization, vw scandal, washing machine, waste, wastewater, water, we mean business, whales, Whirlpool, wind, wisdom, women, Women in Project Management, wood wide web, woonerf, Work Breakdown Structures (WBS), world breakdown structure, worms, xian, xylotron, Yale

Date

Climate Change Change Is Real

Categories: Activism, Leadership

linkedin twitter facebook Request to reuse this  

We DO NOT know if climate change is real.*

What we DO know, as an absolute, undisputed fact, is that climate change change is real.

Here's the executive summary, fellow project managers: whatever you believe or don't believe about climate change is actually trivial from a project management perspective, compared to the fact that businesses are initiating changes to their fundamental business plans and business cases based on what they perceive to be an issue important for their survival.

Projects - by definition - are about change.  Projects are initiated to incorporate changes, and they are selected by businesses based on their fit with the portfolio of programs and projects that help them stay true to their long-term, sustainable success.

Back slowly away from this blog post, and read this article.  Then return.

If you read the article - great.  That means you can skip this pull-quote because you've already got the point.  For those of you who didn't, please at least read this:

'...many businesses in Boston and beyond are taking matters into their own hands, preparing for a warmer world in which severe weather, rising sea levels, and increased flooding threaten property, operations, and earnings.

Developers have moved electrical units from the basements to rooftops of buildings in the Seaport District along Boston Harbor. Utilities in New England have elevated substations several feet above the ground and replaced wooden electrical poles with steel ones that can withstand powerful winds.

Insurance companies, in response to clients, are testing products designed to protect against varied effects of climate change, and providing more coverage against natural disasters. The Hartford insurance company now offers small businesses policies against losses due to widespread power outages, a growing concern as major storms occur more frequently.

“We think the time for debating [climate change] is over,” said Ed White, vice president of customer strategy and environmental for National Grid, a British company with its US headquarters in Waltham. “We see it occurring. We’ve lived through the flooding, we’ve seen the damage that it had to our communities and our equipment.”'

So, in other words, as we said in a previous blog post, "Get Your Head Outta The Sand", your sponsors are "on board" with climate change.  This means:

  • projects are already being launched by businesses in response to challenges posed by perceived threats (and in some cases opportunities) caused by climate change
  • enterprises are more commonly connecting their fundamental mission statements and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) with their portfolios
  • a knowledge of the issues, the language, the nature of climate change is an advantage whatever your beliefs
  • jobs - even entire career paths - are bending to the reality of organizations responding to climate change.

What kinds of organizations are reacting to climate change?  Is it just biofuel companies, fair-trade clothing co-operatives, and organic food family farms?

Hardly.

Again, from the article:

'Insurers, too, are concerned about hurricanes, tornadoes, and wildfires occurring more frequently. Three of the top six years for catastrophic insured losses have occurred since 2005 with a combined $142 billion in expenses, according to the Insurance Information Institute, an industry research group that has tracked the costs since 1989.

Data about climate, which was primarily used by federal agencies and insurance companies in the past, is now sought by all types of businesses and organizations, from health care providers to banks to manufacturers, said Kyle Beatty, the president of Verisk Climate. Verisk, headquartered in New Jersey, bought a Lexington climate research firm six years ago in anticipation of growing demand for climate information.

A retailer may want to know the likelihood of major storms downing power lines and triggering blackouts that would close stores, Beatty said. A manufacturer might want to diversify suppliers if a particular contractor is in a flood-prone region.

“The business reaction is to the fact that they’re experiencing impacts to their operations and earnings that they haven’t in the past, they need strategies to address that,” Beatty said.'

So it's retailers, manufacturers, insurers, financial institutions.  These are the types of organizations that get their work done through - you guessed it - projects.  That means they need project managers who understand the background and drivers of these changes.

We insist that it's time to get smart about this, if only for increased job opportunities and security.  Stay tuned to People, Planet, Profits & Projects.  We'll continue to keep you knowlegeable about sustainability and project management - and the increasingly important intersection between the two.

 

*although the overwhelming majority (97%) of climate scientists will tell you that it is...

Posted by Richard Maltzman on: May 22, 2014 01:08 AM | Permalink | Comments (0)

Sustainable Governance

linkedin twitter facebook Request to reuse this  

I started doing project management work before I knew it was project management work.  Just like a lot of us, I “accidently” became a project manager. Then there was a time when I purposely did project management work.  It was no longer an accident that I was doing it.  The next logical step in the project management progression was to somehow manage a group of projects that have similar or related content is a coordinated way.  Back in the day, at the 1998 Lucent-wide Project Management Conference, I gave a talk entitled Program Management - An Integrated(ing) Approach to Setting and Meeting Customer Expectations.  That was in the relative infancy of program management at Lucent Technologies.   The Project Management Organization was an outgrowth of the coordination of project management within an organization; putting the same face on how projects are managed across the organizations internal boundaries.

Project Portfolio Management is another progressive step in the overall process of managing projects to meet or exceed customer expectations.  It looks closely at aligning organizational strategies and business goals with the projects the organization undertakes.    I needed this first bit of information as background, as a foundation.  Now I’d like to look at the overall, “overall” and the specific of the “specific”.  Meaning, I’d like to kick this all up a level and look at the overall, governance, and the specific, IT governance, as it relates to sustainability.

Simplified, governance is the way an organization is structured in order to pursue its business.  I believe that structure needs to be sustainable.  When I refer to sustainable in this context, I am looking at the way an organization pursues its business with relationship to the social, environmental, and profit (Triple Bottom-line), rather than just its profit objectives.  Of course, one of the objectives of a business is to stay in business.  Even with a not-for-profit, there is a money making motivation to keep the operation afloat.  So both for-profit and not-for-profit are included.

It is easy to relate governance with sustainability when you think about one aspect of governance is the adherence to regulations, as well as using best practices to gain efficiencies, and considering standards and industry recommendations.  One of our assertions state “Project managers must first understand the green (sustainable) aspects of their projects, knowing that this will better equip them to identify, manage, and respond to projects risk.”  This is also words for the governance body to take to heart.  Can you think of any companies that have paid the price because they did not consider sustainability (environmental in particular) risks?  Perhaps those organizations should have thought about including sustainability in their governance strategy.

IT governance is a subset of the overall management of an organizational strategy but has to be closely tied to the overall business strategy.  Why is IT governance so important?  The reason is that an organization’s IT can have the biggest impact to planet, profit and people.  If you are a Google or an Amazon, you rely heavily on IT and can make a huge impact.  Even if you are a one-person company, you probably rely on your computer and Internet connection more than you’d like.  And, whether you are a mega-consumer sales company or a Craigslister, how you manage your power consumption, for instance, will make a difference on your businesses bottom-line, impact on the planet, and how your human resources (maybe just you) are impacted.

It is time to follow the continuum from green project management, to sustainable project management to sustainable program management, to sustainable portfolio management to sustainable governance.  It is no longer adequate to address sustainability only from the project level.  We all know, to be most effective, sustainability has to be part of an organization’s thinking, driven from the top, a strategy incorporated within its governance and particularly its IT governance.   

Posted by Dave Shirley on: May 12, 2014 03:34 PM | Permalink | Comments (0)

Get your head out of the sand!

Categories: Leadership, Government

linkedin twitter facebook Request to reuse this  

We know that some project managers are climate change skeptics.  We know that project managers aren’t limited to any part of the political spectrum.  We get that sustainability may seem like a hifalutin, pompous, philosophical idea that just isn’t that, well, project-managy.

We get all of this.

In fact, it’s important that a project manager be a skeptic.  Blindly accepting an overly optimistic estimate, for example, can doom a project.

And yet, take this example: as a team leader, we cannot tell what motives our team members have – we can only observe their behavior.   We need to manage our project teams on that observed behavior, and the best of us look for the root motives to understand and work with team members’ interests.

See: http://www.sparknotes.com/psychology/psych101/motivation/section1.rhtml

Now, take the example and expand it to what we observe (whatever we believe) when it comes to climate change.

Case in point: Boston.  There is a cover story in a recent Boston Globe Magazine entitled, “Getting Ready for Global Warming – Boston Under Water”.  In it, you will find a list of five things that Boston is doing right now to prepare for the effects of global warming.

Every single one of these “things” is truly an initiative which consumes resources, has a definitive start and finish date, is unique and… well..  does this sound like anything familiar?  It should.  Because all five things are projects.

So our point is this.  Wherever you stand on climate change – you believe it, you’re cynical, you’re skeptical, it’s a sham, a conspiracy, whatever – wherever you stand, real projects are being launched that need real project management expertise and real project managers.

So, for example, would you want to be out of contention for a project to redesign buildings so that their first floors are 42 inches above the current 100-year flood level, with all electrical and mechanical systems on the roof, where a surge resistant reef is built around sites along the waterfront, and it is designed to keep working even after a Hurricane Sandy-like superstorm?

Now let’s open up our blinders even further, beyond Boston, beyond the United States.  The EU has just approved more than 280M Euros for new environmental and climate change projects. - 

So you see, whatever you think of climate change…wherever you are on the political spectrum.. if you want to expand your own portfolio of project management opportunities, it may pay to  get increasingly conversant on the topics of climate change risk and the response that businesses are planning.  And executing.  Now.  Right now.

Ignoring this, by keeping your head in the sand, or letting your own views cloud your view of these opportunities could be hazardous to your career.

Thoughts?

Posted by Richard Maltzman on: May 04, 2014 02:07 PM | Permalink | Comments (6)

Hungry?

linkedin twitter facebook Request to reuse this  

We sometimes blog about subjects that are not strictly project management, but the usually deal with the environment (planet) and will certainly spawn projects in this case, if we are to continue to have something to eat, water to drink, fuel to heat our houses, and electricity to do a lot of things.  One such story in the WSJ the other day caught my eye.  The headline read “China Details Vast Extent of Soil Pollution” by Josh Chin and Brian Spegele.   The sub-heading is About a Fifth of Nation’s Arable Land Is Contaminated with Heavy Metals.  Think about the magnitude for a minute.

There is 3.7 million square miles in China.  Of that, about 522,000 acres are considered arable (fertile, cultivatable) land.  According to China’s Environmental Ministry, 19.4% of that land is contaminated.  More that ¾ of that contamination is from inorganic chemicals, particularly cadmium, nickel and arsenic, all highly toxic to humans.  Can China afford to lose that much land to polluted soil?  The short answer is no and China will have to begin importing food to sustain the amount of food needed for its population.    The other question is how much more arable land will be lost in the future unless something is done about what China puts into their ground?  That is a question for another day.

This is where projects come in.  Besides importing food, one of the alternatives is soil remediation.  While it is a way of purifying and revitalizing land, it is a “technical demanding process that can take decades.”  Another alternative is for the land to be able to increase its yield.  In my Green IT course, I challenge my students to take an in depth look at a Green IT subject of their choice or interest.  In the 42 or so hours we meet in class, I cannot cover any one Green IT subject in that depth, so here is their chance.  One of my students this year picked green IT for sustainable farming.  Not only are there projects that can help the agriculture industry to be more efficient, there are high tech ways to do that.  So, how about this; sustainability (planet), projects, people (food), profits (selling food) and high tech.  It doesn’t get any better than that!

Just to give you a couple of examples from the paper:

1.       Precision agriculture – irrigating specific areas of a field based on the dryness of the soil or fertilizing a specific area of a field based on local nitrogen areas, rather than broadcasting fertilizer or water.  Sensors throughout the field monitor dryness and nitrogen levels and then activate the necessary delivery systems for water and fertilizer.

2.       Integrated management system – using software to provide an end-to-end solution from controlling the precision delivery systems to supply chain management of raw material to transportation of final product.

I don’t mean to imply that IT will be a solution so that we can continue to use our resources in an unsustainable manner.  What I want to offer is high tech farming as a project to compliment to managing our scarce and critical resources.  I’d say eating is a priority!

Posted by Dave Shirley on: April 30, 2014 11:43 AM | Permalink | Comments (0)

Feel the power!

Categories: Leadership

linkedin twitter facebook Request to reuse this  

 

We're lucky to be in a field, a discipline, a career - whatever you choose to call it - which has a tremendous, rosy, powerful future.  A recent feature in PM Network has this to say:

"By 2020, 15.7 million new project management jobs will be added around the globe, with an economic impact of more than US$18 trillion."  -PMI's PM Talent Gap Report

This actually puts pressure on organizations to find project managers, having to compete for project managers like you.  Not a bad position for you to be in, eh? 

So here's where it gets interesting to us at EarthPM, where we've been pushing for integration of sustainability thinking into project management with books and blog postings for what seems like a decade.  It turns out that project managers WANT (dare we even say need) to be part of the greater effort of their organization.  We mean "greater" in both senses of the word:

  • The greater, larger, bigger picture that evokes the bigger, enlarged, longer term
  • The "greater good' - that is, doing things that help the overall human family and our environment

And, as you've seen in prior posts, organizations are striving for that same thing; just look at the mission and vision statements of various companies.  Better yet: look at the mission statement of YOUR OWN company.  We just posted a story about this on our own blog.  Have a look.

But right now, back to "Feel the Power".

Here are some outstanding quotes from the April, 2014 PM Network magazine that we found particularly poignant:

"Project managers thrive when they see the larger organizational strategy and understand how their initiatives affect it. “Project managers have a lot of passion for what they do. They like to feel like they’re part of a greater good and can help organizations achieve their objectives,” says Scott Fass, PMP, managing director of advisory practice, PwC, a PMI Global Executive Council member in Washington, D.C., USA."

So here is a reaffirmation of what we've been saying: PMs do a better job, and even enjoy the work better when they see how their project fits into the bigger picture.  Now - how about that greater-good thing?

"SFE Produksjon lets candidates know of its corporate social responsibility program, especially its focus on green, renewable energy. “Many potential applicants view the positive public image of the company as a favorable trait when considering applying for a position,” says Oyvind Huus, PMP, head of project management, SFE Produksjon, Sandane, Norway."

There it is.  Here's a company (and they are by no means alone) stating directly that companies recruit project managers by putting their 'green side up' on the table and communicating their values to PM candidates, with respect to CSR (in this case the environment).

So, you do the math.

  1. Organizations are going to need more and more project managers
  2. Organizations are giving increasing value to sustainability as a core objective
  3. Project managers are increasingly interested in the greater good
  4. Organizations understand numbers 1, 2, and 3, above.

It all adds up to this:

Excel at your job.  Add competency in sustainability.  Get in touch with your sustainability-oriented self and develop strategic, long-term thinking capability (without losing that "get'R' Done" PM attitude).    You'll increase your ability to thrive even further in this environment of high desirability for project managers.

And feel the power!  You are in demand.

Posted by Richard Maltzman on: April 14, 2014 10:07 AM | Permalink | Comments (0)
ADVERTISEMENTS

"When you cannot get a compliment any other way, pay yourself one."

- Mark Twain

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsors