The Clumsy AI-ssistant, Part 2
|
In Part 1 of this blog post, I introduced the idea of, and demonstrated the capabilties of ChatGPT (and by extension Generative AI) at the intersection of PM and Sustainability. ChatGPT did well – not perfect, but well - in that exercise.
In Part 2 of “the Clumsy AI-ssistant”, I am going to get right into a dialogue with ChatGPT in which we see it applied to the construction project: build a birdhouse.
Rich: I am building a birdhouse for local chickadees. Acting as a project manager, can you create a network diagram for this initiative? ChatGPT: Certainly, I can help you create a simplified network diagram for your birdhouse-building project. A network diagram is a visual representation of the project's tasks and their interdependencies. Here's a basic network diagram for your chickadee birdhouse project: Project: Building a Chickadee Birdhouse
This is a simplified network diagram for your chickadee birdhouse project, outlining the sequence of tasks and their dependencies. Each task should be completed before the next one begins. Keep in mind that this is a relatively straightforward project, and the tasks listed are quite high-level. You can further break down these tasks into more detailed subtasks or include additional tasks as needed.
Rich: But, can't some of those tasks be done in parallel?
ChatGPT: Certainly, some of the tasks in your birdhouse project can be performed in parallel to save time and improve project efficiency. Parallel tasks are those that don't have strict dependencies on each other and can be executed simultaneously without one task blocking the other. Here's a revised network diagram that takes parallel execution into account: Project: Building a Chickadee Birdhouse
In this revised network diagram, Task 2 (Gather Materials) can begin as soon as Task 1 (Design Birdhouse) starts. Similarly, Task 5 (Paint or Stain) can begin once Task 4 (Assemble Birdhouse) is in progress. This approach allows for better time management and can potentially shorten the overall project duration by overlapping tasks where possible.
Rich: But you didn't include any safety items. We will be cutting wood. How about safety glasses, gloves, maybe even having a first-aid kit nearby? ChatGPT: You are absolutely correct; safety measures are critical when working on a project that involves cutting and working with materials like wood. Safety equipment and precautions should always be included in any project plan. Here's the updated network diagram for your birdhouse project, including safety measures: Project: Building a Chickadee Birdhouse
Including a safety preparations task at the beginning of the project is a crucial step to ensure that all necessary safety measures and equipment are in place. Safety should always be a top priority when working on any project, especially when it involves potentially hazardous activities like cutting wood.
Rich: For Step 2, wouldn't a predecessor to Design be some research as to what are some best examples and trends in birdhouse construction? ChatGPT: You're absolutely right; conducting research and gathering information about best practices and trends in birdhouse construction is an essential step before proceeding with the design. Research serves as a precursor to the design phase, as it informs the design decisions and ensures that the birdhouse meets the needs of the intended occupants (in this case, the chickadees). Here's the updated network diagram for your birdhouse project: Project: Building a Chickadee Birdhouse
Incorporating a research task as the precursor to the design phase will help ensure that the birdhouse design aligns with the best practices and trends in birdhouse construction, and it takes into consideration the specific needs and preferences of chickadees. This approach will lead to a more effective and bird-friendly design. Rich: Why didn't you think of the safety and research tasks? Why did I have to prompt you for this? It seems you left out some important considerations, and without them, I have incomplete scope for the project! ChatGPT: I appreciate your feedback and understand your concern. You are absolutely correct that safety and research are essential considerations in any project, and they should have been included in the initial network diagram. I apologize for any oversight in the initial response. Your input has helped to identify these important aspects of the project. Creating a comprehensive project plan is vital for the successful execution of any project. I'm here to provide guidance and information, and your feedback is valuable in ensuring that all crucial elements are considered. In building a birdhouse or any other project, safety and research are key components that should be integrated from the beginning to ensure that the project is carried out effectively and safely. Thank you for highlighting these important aspects, and I'm here to assist with any further questions or project planning needs you may have. What do you think of this exchange? I’m really interested in your human feedback here. Do you notice a couple of things, as I did?
This reinforces my point – and actually ChatGPT literally made it for me by saying “I’m here to assist”. It’s an assistant, alright, and can indeed be very helpful, even invaluable. But it is clumsy. So, work with it knowing that it’s a clumsy assistant! |
The Clumsy AI-ssistant, Part 1 of 2
|
I’m smack in the middle of the center of gravity of our discipline of project management. At this moment, although Boston is, of course,The Hub of the Universe, the center of the project management profession is right here in downtown Atlanta, Georgia in the US, thanks to the PMI Global Summit 2023. The theme – and the very atmosphere – at the PMI Global Summit is AI. It’s in the Exhibit Hall, it’s in the sessions, it’s in gigantic letters and imagery on the signage. It is LITERALLY a hot-button. Conventioneers are wearing buttons that say “PMI x AI”.
So I thought I would look at the intersection of AI, PM, and Sustainability by running a little experiment. I asked ChatGPT, which, like all Generative AI systems, I call a “clumsy assistant ™”, to help me as the director of a GPMO, how can I shift the mindset of my PM population to a more holistic, long-term project perspective. And now, I let the experiment unfold before your very “A Eyes”. Rich (the human) enters: I am a director in a global project management office for a large company with over 3000 project managers. I am trying to shift the mindset of our project managers from only thinking of scope, time, and cost, to thinking past the end of their project - thinking about the project's outcome in the steady state. What do you suggest?
CHATGPT SAYS: Shifting the mindset of project managers from a narrow focus on scope, time, and cost to a more holistic perspective that considers the project's outcomes in the steady state is a crucial step for ensuring long-term success and value delivery. Here are some strategies you can employ to help your project managers make this shift:
By implementing these strategies, you can help project managers develop a more comprehensive view of their projects and drive a mindset shift towards achieving and sustaining positive outcomes in the steady state. Then, I told ChatGPT that a “self-proclaimed expert” had given me some advice, and gave ChatGPT its own advice back, asking it to validate it and give its opinion as to how good an answer the self-proclaimed expert (i.e. ChatGPT!) gave me. Here is what I got back: CHATGPT SAYS The advice provided by the self-proclaimed expert is well-rounded and aligns with best practices for shifting project managers' mindsets towards considering long-term outcomes in the steady state. It emphasizes a holistic perspective and offers a comprehensive set of strategies to achieve this shift. Overall, the strategies provided in the expert's response align with best practices for making this important mindset shift within your organization. It's a comprehensive approach that addresses various aspects of the transformation, from communication and education to measurement and culture development. Implementing these strategies should contribute to your goal of ensuring long-term success and value delivery in your projects.
It did make some slight tweaks, but mostly cosmetic and of little impact. But it did make some adjustments. In Part 2, I will share another conversation where we can see that ChatGPT is helpful, but clumsy. This is why I think the best way to work with it is to imagine a brilliant intern helping you in the lab. They think of chemical reactions you would NEVER imagine. They are creative and seem to have tons of chemistry knowledge at their fingertips. However, sometimes they knock over a whole rack of test tubes, and inadvertently create explosive reactions that release toxic fumes (see the blog's main photo above). What is AI? It's a Clumsy Assistant™. In Part 2, I'll continue with a theme that is emerging here at the conference. To stay relevant as AI becomes more 'atmospheric', you, (yes, you, the very person reading this), must be more human.
|
AI's dirty little - clean little - secret
|
There has been much talk lately about ChatGPT and other generative AI systems, most of it centered on its ability to let students generate essays, to take journalism jobs away, to help or hurt almost every industry. But little has been said about the net effect of these systems in terms of their impact on climate, via the increased computing power that’s needed to power such systems. My attention to this was drawn by an article – theoretically written by a human – on Wired.com. The article is called “The Generative AI Search Race Has a Dirty Secret”. That page also provides an audio snippet of about 6 minutes, well worth a listen. As I was about to write the post about how AI is about to boost the carbon footprint of computing, I did a minor amount of further research and found this article which talks of the promise of AI in terms of reducing carbon footprint and in general being somewhat of a savior in terms of climate change. The article opens with an interesting quote: ”unbound by the restrictions of common sense, readily accessible models today build on semantic relationships derived from large bodies of text, or relationships between large corpuses of text and images. The next generation of models already being built will include video and 3D modeling. Soon, we may hope to design houses by starting with phrases like “single-story mid-century modern, south facing on a forested hillside, three bedrooms”. The article goes on to consider what happens when we (should) add elements of recycled materials, or design for lower energy use into the description of the desired building. There’s other research that indicates a positive effect for AI in terms of carbon reduction, such as this one from the World Economic Forum. That article has the same quandary as I did when I started the “dirty secret” blog post, saying: · By 2030, the tech could help cut global greenhouse gas emissions by 4%, according to a recent study by accounting firm PricewaterhouseCoopers for Microsoft. · But there are energy consumption concerns around AI, algorithms and the processing of large amounts of data. So… who could I ask about this? What sort of wise system could provide an answer about the net effect of generative AI systems? Oh, I know: a generative AI system! So I asked Chat GPT this question:
Overall, since generative AI will cause an increase in carbon footprint, yet has the potential to lower carbon footprints due to innovative design and other AI applications that reduce the carbon footprint, what do you predict will be the net effect of generative AI with respect to carbon footprint? Here is the answer given by ChatGPT: It's difficult to make a definitive prediction on the net effect of generative AI on carbon footprint, as it will depend on a variety of factors, including how the technology is developed and used, and the extent to which it is adopted. On the one hand, the energy consumption required to train large-scale generative AI models can be significant, and this could contribute to an increase in carbon footprint. Additionally, if the applications of generative AI are focused on industries that are particularly carbon-intensive, such as transportation or manufacturing, then the net effect could be an increase in carbon footprint. On the other hand, there are a number of potential applications of generative AI that could have a positive impact on carbon footprint, such as improving the efficiency of energy systems, optimizing the use of renewable energy, and helping to reduce waste and emissions. If generative AI is used in these ways, it could help to reduce carbon footprint and mitigate the effects of climate change. Overall, it's likely that the net effect of generative AI on carbon footprint will depend on the balance between these different factors, and how the technology is developed and adopted in the coming years. It will be important for developers and policymakers to prioritize environmentally responsible applications of generative AI, and to ensure that the energy consumption associated with the technology is sustainable and powered by renewable sources.
When I asked the System specifically about the “dirty” and “clean” aspects, I got more detail:
Will generative AI increase the carbon footprint of computing? Generative AI has the potential to increase the carbon footprint of computing, depending on how it is implemented and used. Training a generative AI model requires significant amounts of computing power, and this can contribute to increased energy consumption and carbon emissions. In particular, large-scale models like GPT-3 require massive amounts of computational resources, including high-end hardware like graphics processing units (GPUs) and tensor processing units (TPUs), which can consume a lot of energy. Additionally, the use of generative AI in applications like chatbots, virtual assistants, and automated content generation can also contribute to increased energy consumption if these applications are widely used and require a lot of processing power. However, there are also efforts underway to make generative AI more energy-efficient, such as developing more efficient hardware and software algorithms. Furthermore, there is a growing interest in using renewable energy sources, such as wind and solar power, to power data centers where AI models are trained and hosted. Overall, while generative AI does have the potential to increase the carbon footprint of computing, there are also measures that can be taken to mitigate its impact on the environment. Will generative AI increase the carbon footprint of computing? Generative AI has the potential to increase the carbon footprint of computing, depending on how it is implemented and used. Training a generative AI model requires significant amounts of computing power, and this can contribute to increased energy consumption and carbon emissions. In particular, large-scale models like GPT-3 require massive amounts of computational resources, including high-end hardware like graphics processing units (GPUs) and tensor processing units (TPUs), which can consume a lot of energy. Additionally, the use of generative AI in applications like chatbots, virtual assistants, and automated content generation can also contribute to increased energy consumption if these applications are widely used and require a lot of processing power. However, there are also efforts underway to make generative AI more energy-efficient, such as developing more efficient hardware and software algorithms. Furthermore, there is a growing interest in using renewable energy sources, such as wind and solar power, to power data centers where AI models are trained and hosted. Overall, while generative AI does have the potential to increase the carbon footprint of computing, there are also measures that can be taken to mitigate its impact on the environment.
Do generative AI systems have the potential to help solve the climate crisis? Yes, generative AI systems have the potential to help solve the climate crisis in a variety of ways. Here are some examples:
Overall, generative AI systems have the potential to help solve the climate crisis by providing more accurate climate modeling, optimizing energy usage, facilitating the deployment and management of renewable energy resources, and improving the efficiency of carbon capture technology. However, it's important to ensure that the development and use of AI systems are done in a way that is environmentally responsible and sustainable. What do you (humans) think? What role do project managers play? What role do project LEADERS play? Personally, I think it’s a big, important role, and it all starts (as did this post) with asking the right questions. Please comment, if possible, without using ChatGPT, but if you do, say how you used it! |







