We've often covered "green-by-definition" projects - those where the ultimate deliverable is reduction of waste, generation of renewable power, preserving biodiversity, and so on.
We also continue to stress that projects of any kind can have a green (or at least sustainability) component. This is the concept behind our "Spectrum of Green" as discussed in our book, Green Project Management.
Well, here is an example of a green project which has folded two green objectives into one - generating renewable energy, and preserving a precious resource (water).
A first of its kind, Gujarat (a state in northwestern India) will dedicate India’s first 1 MW Canal-top Solar Power Project on the Sanand Branch Canal of the Sardar Sarovar Project.
Here's another photo:
This project was developed by Gujarat State Electricity Corporation Limited (GSECL) with support from the Sardar Sarovar Narmada Nigam Limited (SSNNL). It will generate 1.6 million units of clean electricity per year and 90 lakh litres of water will be prevented from getting evaporated.
We won't give all of the technical details, you can read them all here.
And, if you want to hear about it directly from Narendra Modi, the CM (Chief Minister) of the state of Gujarat, he has actually blogged about this right here:
So think about it. Are there any "regular" projects on which you're working where there may be a possible sustainability benefit? Or, if you're already working on a 'green by definition' project, is there a way that a secondary benefit may be an outcome?
One thing that's always been interesting to us as consultants in project management is stakeholder identification and analysis. One thing that's also interesting and often left out is the interaction between stakeholders. This could be a pair (or trio, or quad) of stakholders with similar interests, wildly different interests, or a mix. In our opinion, one of the columns on a stakeholder register should be "Interactions", to capture this complex and important human aspect of your project.
This couldn't have been illustrated better than with this article featured on Earth Day in the Cape Cod Times. In the article you'll discover the interaction between potentially green-minded, well-intentioned folks, in a project involving installation of 3,150 solar panels. The project also involved the clearing of a bunch of trees in what is one of the few remaining undeveloped plots of land in Hackensack, NJ, USA.
Last year, a similar situation occurred when 100 eucalyptus trees were cut down to make room for solar panels in a regional park.
Which "green" is better? This is the question posed in the article.
We tend to side side with the considerations explained in the article by Ashwani Vasishth, of Ramapo College's Center for Environmental Studies, who explains that trees don't only sequester carbon - they provide habitat, capture rainwater to prevent erosion, help provide shade and cooling, and remove particulate matter.
So it's similar to our points about long-term thinking in general. Full consideration is important. And this case it it's literally a matter of seeing the forest for the trees.
Recently, three North American Civil Engineering organizations - The American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), the Canadian Society for Civil Engineering (CSCE) and the Institution of Civil Engineers (ICE) came together and published a joint document, Civil Engineering for a Sustainable Future.
A family member (thanks Dipak!) forwarded this to us and we were quite pleased with what we saw. Now. Can you think of another discipline in which sustainabiity plays a key role? Think about it. I'm thinking of a discipline that - for example - works with civil engineers on - what shall I call them - hmmm, okay, projects, that's what I'll call them. Now, what would one call the discipline used to manage these projects?
Let's see. Manage projects, managing projects.... hmmm. How about project management? That seems like a logical name!
So wouldn't it be sweet if the key institutions that help codify, organize, and promote our discipline of project management would make this kind of statement? We think so. Maybe PMI and APM could do something like this? Dare we dream that?
And below, so you can see what other disciplines - very project-intertwined disciplines - are doing, is the text of the statement:
-------------
Statement of the American Society of Civil Engineers, the Canadian Society for Civil Engineering and the Institution of Civil Engineers Following the 2012 Triennial Conference
Background
The American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), the Canadian Society for Civil Engineering (CSCE) and the Institution of Civil Engineers (ICE) believe that emerging global challenges over the last decade, including the financial crisis, population migration, and food and energy crises, have reinforced the need to secure and fulfill internationally agreed commitments to sustainable development.
The three organizations also believe that sustainable progress toward achieving the UN Millennium Development Goals is necessary to address water and food scarcity.
For such commitments to be realized, critical infrastructure must be adapted to the impacts of climate change and resilient to natural and man-made disasters.
The role of civil engineers
The three institutions commit to lead internationally on the delivery of sustainable infrastructure. Civil engineers of the 21st century are called on to play a critical role in contributing to peace and security in an increasingly challenged world. Civil engineers have an obligation to protect cultural and natural diversity, and they are central to the planning, design, construction, operation, maintenance and decommissioning of infrastructure networks that underpin civil society and economic activity and protect human health and welfare. Emerging challenges have reinforced the key role of these networks in enabling global societal resilience.
Approximately 75% of the issues outlined in Agenda 21, the main action document from the 1992 Earth Summit, involve engineering and technical issues. Action by civil engineers is essential. Society needs the skills of civil engineers to attain sustainable development, yet civil engineers require global political will to enable them to apply their knowledge and expertise to appropriately adapt infrastructure to attain meaningful progress.
While ASCE, CSCE, and ICE are committed to a civil engineering profession able to address the global challenge of sustainable development, they recognize that engineers cannot deliver this vision on their own. Civil engineers must develop new skills for a changing world, foster greater collaboration with other professionals, and promote multidisciplinary approaches. Civil engineers are committed to provide the tools and advice to governments and policymakers at national and supranational levels on the skills and infrastructure required for a sustainable future.
Engineering priorities and action
Recognizing the central role of their profession in addressing global challenges, ASCE, CSCE, and ICE developed a Sustainable Development Protocol in 2006, agreeing to develop sustainable development strategies and action plans. This was followed in 2009 by a civil engineering and climate change protocol that further identified priorities for action by engineers.
The three organizations have since adopted and regularly reviewed action plans and undertaken a range of activities to advance sustainability in civil infrastructure. Progress in line with commitments is exemplified in adapting critical infrastructure, utilizing environmental accounting tools, addressing the water crisis and delivering on the UN Millennium Development Goals.
Environmental, social and economic impacts and costs—the triple bottom line The three organizations are committed to improving methods for identifying and considering all of a project’s environmental, social and economic costs and impacts throughout its life cycle. Practical approaches should be developed that would alter conventional accounting practices to factor in the direct and indirect environmental costs of a facility through its life-cycle of operations.
Condition and capacity of infrastructure
Civil engineers create and maintain society’s infrastructure. Recognizing this responsibility, ASCE, CSCE and ICE are committed to collecting data on infrastructure both nationally and, through collaboration, internationally to provide informed opinion on the condition and requisite capacity of infrastructure for sustainable development.
Adaptation of infrastructure to climate change
To address climate change the engineering profession is applying the principles of sustainability, energy efficiency and innovation to the design, construction, operation and maintenance of infrastructure. Engineers must develop infrastructure capable of adaptation to the affects of climate change.
Engineers have relied upon historical data to design infrastructure. Such data is often incomplete and limited in duration. Now they must develop design and operational practices to withstand climate conditions — both extremes and gradual changes. They must accommodate increased uncertainties because the data about future climate will never be as precise as the historical data. This creates a challenge to existing infrastructure design approaches and practices.
Millennium Development Goals
ASCE, CSCE and ICE support the internationally agreed upon development goals contained in the Millennium Declaration as they apply to improving the quality of people’s lives around the world through science and engineering. The three organizations will work with each other and with domestic and international organizations to engage engineers in addressing the needs of the poor through capacity building and the development of sustainable and appropriate solutions to poverty.
By helping meet the goals of the Millennium Declaration, the engineering profession contributes to a world where all people have access to the knowledge and resources to meet their basic human needs and promote sustainable development. Included are such areas as water supply and sanitation, food production and processing, housing and construction, energy, transportation and communication, income generation, and employment creation.
Commitments
Within the following areas of leadership with respect to sustainable infrastructure, ASCE, CSCE, ICE commit to:
Collaborating on their national sustainable infrastructure action plans.
Encouraging engineers to engage in building sustainable engineering capacity in the developing world and continuing to work with national development organizations such USAID – US Agency for International Development, DFID – UK Department of Foreign International Development and CIDA – Canadian International Development Agency and other related assistance organizations.
Working through national representatives to coordinate civil engineering views within the World Federation of Engineering Organizations to enable WFEO to influence programs on sustainable infrastructure and communities in conjunction with UNESCO, the United Nations, the World Bank, international financial institutions and other bodies.
Signed by:
Andrew W. Herrmann, P.E., SECB, F.ASCE
President
American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)
Richard Coackley, BSc, CEng, FICE, CWEM, FCIWEM
President
Institute of Civil Engineers (ICE)
Randy Pickle, P.Eng, FCSCE, FEC
President
Canadian Society for Civil Engineering (CSCE)
-----
The highlighting is ours. But you can clearly see that these organizatoins GET IT. We am hoping that over the next few months, greater and greater numbers of project managers will GET IT.
Talk it up at your PMI chapter meetings, and if you're involved with APM, IPMA or any other PM umbrella organizations, propose that this is something we could and should do just as well as our colleagues in civil engineering.
At EarthPM, people from IT departments of every sort always ask us - perhaps challlenge us is a better way to put it - how they can help.
"We're in IT", the story goes. "We aren't an energy-intense organization. Are you telling us to turn our computers off and keep the lights and heat off when nobody's there?". And the answer is, of course, yes. These things will help.
But it is bigger than that. And IT (Information Technology) is bigger than that.
Bigger, in terms of size, and bigger in terms of maturity.
Witness the press announcement we share below, from a non-profit consortium called GreenTouch. Established just a few years ago, it is "dedicated to fundamentally transforming communications and data networks, including the Internet, and significantly reducing the carbon footprint of ICT devices, platforms and networks."
They have set lofty and worthy goals which hopefully help answer some of the edgy questions we get from our IT colleagues:
By 2015, our goal is to deliver the architecture, specifications and roadmap --and demonstrate key components -- needed to increase network energy efficiency by a factor of 1000 from current levels. We'll accomplish this by designing fundamentally new network architectures and creating the enabling technologies on which they are based.
In reaching this goal, GreenTouch members and the global community will benefit from:
A reinvention of today’s telecommunications networks
A sustainable future for data networking and the Internet
Unprecedented collaboration with leading experts from around the world
Participation in fundamental research in exciting new areas
Access to network models and studies examining key energy related issues
New information on network power consumption, traffic growth, and energy trends
So now to the news. Here is their press release about this latest development and fiinally, the connection to the streets of San Francisco.
The GreenTouch Consortium, a global research initiative dedicated to dramatically improving network energy efficiency, introduced a major breakthrough for optical access -- Bit-Interleaved Passive Optical Network (Bi-PON) technology. GreenTouch estimates Bi-PON ultimately could deliver power reduction of 30 times over current technologies while improving performance and reducing cost.
In a webcast, researchers from Alcatel-Lucent's Bell Labs, France's INRIA research lab and France Telecom Orange, described how the bit interleaving passive optical network (BIPON) leverages a new protocol that cuts energy consumption in time division multiplexing (TDM) PON optical network units (ONUs) by a factor of 10 compared to today’s protocols. The key observation is that 99% of data is unnecessarily processed in ONUs today. By modifying the protocol, an order of magnitude improvement in ONU performance can be attained.
The bit interleaving protocol reduces energy consumption in the ONU by reducing clock speed requirements, data processing requirements, voltage requirements, and memory requirements. The bits are spaced in time to match the clock rate. The bit interleaving protocol frame structure includes a header and a payload section. The header contains a synchronization code word and a unique identifier for each ONU on the PON. The header also contains information that allows the ONU to know where its payload bits are — at what offset and bit rate they are being sent in the payload section.
The consortium members said Bi-PON represents the next major leap in passive optical network (PON) technologies. It is expected to be a necessity as electronic processing will increase with future 40GPON systems.
“With this demonstration, GreenTouch again shows why it is one of the most ambitious collaborative environments in sustainable network technologies,” said Gee Rittenhouse, GreenTouch chairman. “We are committed to reducing energy consumption across all ICT networks and Bi-PON is a huge and critical step in helping us achieve that goal. The impact is clear and wide-ranging including wireless backhaul and fiber to the home. Implementing Bi-PON over current technologies will have the energy savings equivalent to the carbon impact of permanently taking all the cars in a city like San Francisco off the road. We are making great progress toward our goal and are planning to make advances like this across all of our 25 research projects that are currently underway.”
If you're prepared for a rather detailed technical description and demo of this BiPon technology, watch the video below:
So next time you wonder whether or not IT can make a difference, flash back to (if you are old enough) an episode of The Streets of San Francisco.
If you take nothing away from this article other than the link to Earth Beat, an outstanding resource from Radio Netherlands, we've done our job.
But don't head off there quite yet.
We just wanted to bring to your attention the project started by 10-year-old Daniel Cashdan, of Oak Park, California, USA, in which he decided to try to - in effect - grow his own peanut-butter and jelly sandwich.
It is a bit about understanding how food is sourced and grown, how food is so convenient but really takes a lot of energy and effort.
Here's a link to the specific radio segment on Daniel Cashdan:
Now, zoom out a little. Earth Beat is a program on Radio Netherlands, in English, which covers all sorts of interesting stories on all things sustainable. Many are about projects, and projects not as limited in scope as growing your own PBJ sandwich.
This week's particular program, Food, Glorious Food, was about food in general. But Earth Beat's host, Marnie Chesterton, can always be counted on to inform, entertain, intrigue, and while doing so, tickle your funnybone.
So we suggest that you sit yourself down to a home-made (and perhaps home-grown?) peanut-butter and jelly sandwich, and listen to a few episodes of Earth Beat.
You can thank us later. Seriously. Please thank us. We'll know you're listening.
